Literature DB >> 31044646

Development of a Novel Gait Analysis Tool Measuring Center of Pressure for Evaluation of Canine Chronic Thoracolumbar Spinal Cord Injury.

Melissa J Lewis1, Kimberly D Williams2, Taylor Langley3, Leighanne M Jarvis4, Gregory S Sawicki5, Natasha J Olby6,7.   

Abstract

Gait evaluation after spinal cord injury (SCI) is an important component of determining functional status. Analysis of center of pressure (COP) provides a dynamic reflection of global locomotion and postural control and has been used to quantify various gait abnormalities. We hypothesized that COP variability would be greater for SCI versus normal dogs and that COP would be able to differentiate varying injury severity. Our objective was to investigate COP, COP variability, and body weight support percentage in dogs with chronic SCI. Eleven chronically non-ambulatory dogs after acute severe thoracolumbar SCI were enrolled. COP measurements in x (right-to-left, COPx) and y (craniocaudal, COPy) directions were captured while dogs walked on a pressure-sensitive treadmill with pelvic limb sling support. Root mean square values (RMS_COPx and RMS_COPy) were calculated to assess variability in COP. Body weight support percentage was measured using a load cell. Gait also was quantified using an open field scale (OFS) and treadmill-based stepping and coordination scores (SS, RI). Mean COPx, COPy, RMS_COPx, and RMS_COPy were compared between dogs with SCI and previously evaluated healthy controls. RMS measurements and support percentage were compared with standard gait scales (OFS, SS, RI). Mean COPy was more cranial and RMS_COPx and RMS_COPy were greater in SCI versus normal dogs (p < 0.001). Support percentage moderately correlated with SS (p = 0.019; R2 = 0.47). COP analysis and body weight support measurements offer information about post-injury locomotion. Further development is needed before consideration as an outcome measure to complement validated gait analysis methods in dogs with SCI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  center of pressure; chronic spinal cord injury; dogs, locomotion; postural control

Year:  2019        PMID: 31044646      PMCID: PMC6791469          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2019.6479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  31 in total

1.  Design and testing of statistical methods to classify the severity of steppage gait based on center of pressure data.

Authors:  Nima Jamshidi; Mohammad Hamidi Esfahani; Atousa Farzad; Maya Jamshidi
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 1.538

2.  Dynamical structure of center-of-pressure trajectories in patients recovering from stroke.

Authors:  M Roerdink; M De Haart; A Daffertshofer; S F Donker; A C H Geurts; P J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sagittal plane ground reaction forces, centre of pressure and centre of mass in trotting horses.

Authors:  Sarah J Hobbs; Hilary M Clayton
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 2.688

4.  The assessment of locomotor function in spinal cord injured rats: the importance of objective analysis of coordination.

Authors:  Guido C Koopmans; Ronald Deumens; Wiel M M Honig; Frank P T Hamers; Harry W M Steinbusch; Elbert A J Joosten
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Force plate gait analysis in Doberman Pinschers with and without cervical spondylomyelopathy.

Authors:  K Foss; R C da Costa; P J Rajala-Schuttz; P J Rajala-Shultz; M J Allen
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Adaptation of the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan locomotor rating scale for use in a clinical model of spinal cord injury in dogs.

Authors:  Rachel B Song; D Michele Basso; Ronaldo C da Costa; Lesley C Fisher; Xiaokui Mo; Sarah A Moore
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Compensatory locomotor adjustments of rats with cervical or thoracic spinal cord hemisections.

Authors:  Aubrey A Webb; Gillian D Muir
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Accuracy of spatiotemporal variables in gait analysis of neurologic dogs.

Authors:  Wanda J Gordon-Evans; Richard B Evans; Michael G Conzemius
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  A horse's locomotor signature: COP path determined by the individual limb.

Authors:  Sandra Nauwelaerts; Sarah Jane Hobbs; Willem Back
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Placebo-Controlled, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Polyethylene Glycol and Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate in Dogs with Intervertebral Disk Herniation.

Authors:  N J Olby; A C Muguet-Chanoit; J-H Lim; M Davidian; C L Mariani; A C Freeman; S R Platt; J Humphrey; M Kent; C Giovanella; R Longshore; P J Early; K R Muñana
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  4 in total

1.  Ground Reaction Forces and Center of Pressure within the Paws When Stepping over Obstacles in Dogs.

Authors:  Danae Charalambous; Therese Strasser; Alexander Tichy; Barbara Bockstahler
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Static Body Weight Distribution and Girth Measurements Over Time in Dogs After Acute Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Extrusion.

Authors:  Natalia P Amaral Marrero; Stephanie A Thomovsky; Jessica E Linder; Jessica Bowditch; Mallory Lind; Kristine A Kazmierczak; George E Moore; Melissa J Lewis
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-04

3.  Changes in Ground Reaction Forces and Center of Pressure Parameters of Paws When Wearing Dog Boots in Dogs.

Authors:  Bianca Bieber; Bianca Reicher; Alexander Tichy; Barbara Bockstahler
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-07-12

4.  Static posturography as a novel measure of the effects of aging on postural control in dogs.

Authors:  Alejandra Mondino; Grant Wagner; Katharine Russell; Edgar Lobaton; Emily Griffith; Margaret Gruen; B Duncan X Lascelles; Natasha Jane Olby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.