Literature DB >> 31044244

Development and Validation of an Analytical Method for Quantitation of Sulfolane in Rat and Mouse Plasma by GC-MS.

Melanie A Rehder Silinski1, Teruyo Uenoyama1, Stephen D Cooper1, Reshan A Fernando1, Veronica G Robinson2, Suramya Waidyanatha2.   

Abstract

Sulfolane is an industrial solvent commonly used for extraction of aromatic hydrocarbons in the oil refining process, as well in the purification of natural gas. Its wide use and high solubility in water has led to contamination of groundwater. The objective of this work was to develop and validate an analytical method to quantitate sulfolane in rodent plasma in support of the National Toxicology Program toxicology and toxicokinetic studies of sulfolane. The method uses extraction of plasma with ethyl acetate and analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with electron ionization. The method was validated in male Sprague Dawley (SD) rat plasma over the concentration range of 20-100,000 ng/mL. The method was linear (r ≥ 0.99), accurate (mean relative error (RE) ≤ ±5.1%) and precise (relative standard deviation (RSD) ≤ 2.9%). The absolute recovery was ≥74%. The limit of detection was 0.516 ng/mL. Standards as high as ~2.5 mg/mL could be successfully diluted into the calibration range (mean %RE ≤ ±4.5; %RSD ≤ 4.6). Extracted samples were stable for at least 3 days at ambient and refrigerated temperatures, and freeze/thaw stability in matrix was demonstrated after three cycles over 3 days (calculated concentrations within 90.8-102% of Day 0 concentrations). Sulfolane was stable in frozen plasma for at least 75 days at -80°C (calculated concentrations within 93.0-98.1% of Day 0 concentrations). Matrix evaluation was performed for sulfolane in female SD rat plasma and male and female B6C3F1 mouse plasma (mean %RE ≤ ±4.9; %RSD ≤ 3.3). These data demonstrate that the method is suitable for determination of sulfolane in rodent plasma.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31044244      PMCID: PMC6655407          DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkz031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  4 in total

1.  Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric determination of sulfolane in wetland vegetation exposed to sour gas-contaminated groundwater.

Authors:  J V Headley; K M Peru; L C Dickson
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  A review of analytical methods for the determination of sulfolane and alkanolamines in environmental studies.

Authors:  John V Headley; Phillip M Fedorak; Leslie C Dickson
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.913

3.  Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometry method for the detection of busulphan and its metabolites in plasma and urine.

Authors:  Ibrahim El-Serafi; Ylva Terelius; Brigitte Twelkmeyer; Ann-Louise Hagbjörk; Zuzana Hassan; Moustapha Hassan
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.205

4.  A novel method for quantification of sulfolane (a metabolite of busulfan) in plasma by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  François Versace; Chakradhara Rao S Uppugunduri; Maja Krajinovic; Yves Théorêt; Fabienne Gumy-Pause; Patrice Mangin; Christian Staub; Marc Ansari
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 4.142

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Toxicokinetics and bioavailability of sulfolane, a ground water contaminant, following oral and intravenous administration in rodents: A dose, species, and sex comparison.

Authors:  Suramya Waidyanatha; Sherry R Black; Timothy R Fennell; Scott L Watson; Purvi R Patel; Stephen D Cooper; James Blake; Veronica Godfrey Robinson; Reshan A Fernando; Chad R Blystone
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Comparison of sulfolane effects in Sprague Dawley rats, B6C3F1/N mice, and Hartley guinea pigs after 28 days of exposure via oral gavage.

Authors:  K A Shipkowski; M C Cora; M F Cesta; V G Robinson; S Waidyanatha; K L Witt; M K Vallant; D M Fallacara; M R Hejtmancik; S A Masten; S D Cooper; R A Fernando; C R Blystone
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2021-02-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.