In this issue of N2, the paper by O'Connor et al.[1] reports the clinical, immunologic, and radiographic features of a series of patients with anti-γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor encephalitis. Anti-GABAA receptor encephalitis is characterized by cognitive disruption, severe seizures, and characteristic brain lesions.[2] The disease affects a very broad age range and both sexes. In the current study, as in prior reports, most patients responded favorably to immune therapy, although the optimal approach is still not clear. The series does provide a cautionary note regarding a patient with delayed diagnosis who had poor outcome. The present report further confirms the risk of thymoma, among other malignancies, although cases occurring after herpes virus infection have also been reported.[3]The GABAA receptor is a pentameric chloride channel and the primary rapid inhibitory system in the adult brain.[4] GABAA receptors are incredibly diverse, being comprised of many possible combinations of 6 α subunits, 3 β subunits, 3 γ subunits and 4 δ subunits. The current paper and prior reports have reported antibodies targeting receptors containing α1 and β3 subunits. The antibodies therefore recognize only a subset of GABAA receptors, although these isoforms are widely distributed in the brain.[5] It is unknown whether other patients may have antibodies to other isoforms of the GABAA receptor, or what factors may make these particular subunits particularly immunogenic.The antibodies decrease surface levels of the target receptor on cultured neurons and are very likely directly pathogenic.[2] Severe seizures, particularly epilepsia partialis continua or status epilepticus, are common. GABAA receptor antibodies may therefore be a potential etiology of new onset refractory status epilepticus and should be considered among the other potential autoimmune causes such as GABAB receptor antibodies, NMDA receptor antibodies, etc.[6]The current paper[1] shows excellent examples of the striking and dynamic brain lesions of the disorder, which are readily apparent on T2-weighted MRI studies, and affect both gray and white matter. Some patients may show large areas of cortical edema. Interestingly, the brain lesions tend to respond well to immune therapy, vanishing completely over weeks to months, and leaving little or no residual findings after treatment. Anti-GABAA receptor encephalitis therefore enters into the differential diagnosis of MS and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. In their most dramatic manifestations, these changes are, if not pathognomonic, at least highly suggestive of the disorder. It is unclear whether GABAA receptor antibodies themselves cause the brain lesions, although the rich expression of GABAA receptors on astrocytes may be involved. It is an open question whether other patients with the antibodies may have atypical presentations and thus been under-represented in the published case series.The current paper is a cooperative project involving the Mayo and Oxford groups, as well as researchers at other institutions, and is in agreement with the original work by Dr. Dalmau's group in Barcelona. The confirmation of the nature of the antibodies and associated clinical phenotypes by multiple research groups should be reassuring to physicians who are familiar with the problem of irreproducible or never-replicated autoantibody findings in neurology. As autoantibodies in neurology continue to be proposed, an organized multicenter program may be necessary someday to systematically confirm or refute the proposed autoimmune markers.In summary, anti-GABAA receptor encephalitis is a distinct autoimmune disease characterized by encephalitis, severe seizures, and distinctive brain lesions. It may enter into the differential diagnosis of diverse disorders and can be reliably diagnosed by a cell-based antibody test. Prompt diagnosis and treatment generally results in recovery.
Authors: Nicolas Gaspard; Brandon P Foreman; Vincent Alvarez; Christian Cabrera Kang; John C Probasco; Amy C Jongeling; Emma Meyers; Alyssa Espinera; Kevin F Haas; Sarah E Schmitt; Elizabeth E Gerard; Teneille Gofton; Peter W Kaplan; Jong W Lee; Benjamin Legros; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Brandon M Westover; Suzette M LaRoche; Lawrence J Hirsch Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Marianna Spatola; Mar Petit-Pedrol; Mateus Mistieri Simabukuro; Thaís Armangue; Fernanda J Castro; Maria I Barcelo Artigues; Maria R Julià Benique; Leslie Benson; Mark Gorman; Ana Felipe; Ruben L Caparó Oblitas; Myrna R Rosenfeld; Francesc Graus; Josep Dalmau Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mar Petit-Pedrol; Thaís Armangue; Xiaoyu Peng; Luis Bataller; Tania Cellucci; Rebecca Davis; Lindsey McCracken; Eugenia Martinez-Hernandez; Warren P Mason; Michael C Kruer; David G Ritacco; Wolfgang Grisold; Brandon F Meaney; Carmen Alcalá; Peter Sillevis-Smitt; Maarten J Titulaer; Rita Balice-Gordon; Francesc Graus; Josep Dalmau Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Simone M Brändle; Manuela Cerina; Susanne Weber; Kathrin Held; Amélie F Menke; Carmen Alcalá; David Gebert; Alexander M Herrmann; Hannah Pellkofer; Lisa Ann Gerdes; Stefan Bittner; Frank Leypoldt; Bianca Teegen; Lars Komorowski; Tania Kümpfel; Reinhard Hohlfeld; Sven G Meuth; Bonaventura Casanova; Nico Melzer; Eduardo Beltrán; Klaus Dornmair Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 11.205