| Literature DB >> 31043672 |
Hanieh Arjmand1, Majid Nazemi1, Saija A Kontulainen2, Christine E McLennan3, David J Hunter4, David R Wilson5, James D Johnston6.
Abstract
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31043672 PMCID: PMC6494855 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43379-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Minimum principal stress comparison between OA and normal proximal tibia.
| Minimum principal stress (MPa) | All scans | CV%RMS | OA knees | Normal knees | Difference | 95% CI | p-value | Cohen’s | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean/Median* | SD | Mean/Median* | SD | Mean/Median* | Percent | Lower | Upper | ||||
|
| − |
|
| − |
| − |
| − |
| − | − |
|
|
|
| − |
|
| − |
| − |
| − |
| − | − |
|
|
|
| − |
|
| − |
| − |
| − |
| − | − |
|
|
|
| − |
|
| − |
| − |
| − |
| − | − |
|
|
|
| − |
|
| − |
| − |
| − |
| − | − |
|
|
| Medial epiphyseal trabecular * | −0.43 | 0.15 | 4.8 | −0.47 | 0.18 | −0.35 | 0.06 | −0.12 | 33.2% | −0.32 | 0.01 | 0.085 | 1.03 |
| Medial metaphyseal trabecular * | −0.51 | 0.26 | 8.9 | −0.55 | 0.30 | −0.34 | 0.10 | −0.21 | 63.0% | −0.41 | 0.01 | 0.064 | 1.01 |
|
| − |
|
| − |
| − |
| − |
| − | − |
|
|
| Epiphyseal central | −0.14 | 0.06 | 8.2 | −0.16 | 0.03 | −0.14 | 0.07 | −0.02 | 12.3% | −0.08 | 0.05 | 0.559 | 0.33 |
| Metaphyseal central | −0.12 | 0.04 | 7.3 | −0.13 | 0.03 | −0.12 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 3.8% | −0.05 | 0.04 | 0.838 | 0.12 |
| Lateral subchondral cortical | −0.32 | 0.09 | 5.0 | −0.35 | 0.11 | −0.29 | 0.06 | −0.07 | 22.8% | −0.17 | 0.03 | 0.175 | 0.74 |
| Lateral subchondral trabecular | −0.25 | 0.07 | 4.6 | −0.26 | 0.08 | −0.25 | 0.06 | −0.02 | 6.3% | −0.10 | 0.07 | 0.698 | 0.22 |
| Lateral epiphyseal trabecular | −0.19 | 0.05 | 5.3 | −0.20 | 0.06 | −0.19 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 3.0% | −0.07 | 0.06 | 0.847 | 0.11 |
| Lateral metaphyseal trabecular | −0.15 | 0.04 | 10.5 | −0.15 | 0.04 | −0.16 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 2.2% | −0.05 | 0.06 | 0.896 | 0.07 |
| Lateral peripheral cortical | −0.22 | 0.05 | 5.2 | −0.24 | 0.05 | −0.20 | 0.04 | −0.04 | 22.4% | −0.10 | 0.01 | 0.104 | 0.87 |
| Lateral epiphyseal cortical | −0.25 | 0.06 | 5.9 | −0.29 | 0.06 | −0.23 | 0.04 | −0.06 | 25.2% | −0.12 | 0.00 | 0.057 | 1.00 |
| Lateral metaphyseal cortical | −0.70 | 0.21 | 5.2 | −0.76 | 0.25 | −0.65 | 0.17 | −0.11 | 17.1% | −0.36 | 0.14 | 0.346 | 0.53 |
Mean and SD of repeated scans for both OA and normal, CV%RMS, mean/median and SD for OA knees, mean/median and SD for normal knees, the difference between OA and normal knees (mean and percent relative to normal), 95% confidence of interval, p-value, and effect size (Cohen’s d) of minimum principal stress in different regions of proximal tibia. Measures with significant differences are shown with bold text in the table (p-value < 0.05).
(*) shows regions which were not normally distributed whereby median value used in Mann-Whitney U-tests for statistical comparison, and confidence intervals were calculated using Hodges-Lehmann estimator.
Minimum principal strain comparison between OA and normal proximal tibia.
| Minimum principal strain (microstrain) | All scans | CV%RMS | OA knees | Normal knees | Difference | 95% CI | p-value | Cohen’s | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean/Median* | SD | Mean/Median* | SD | Mean/Median* | Percent | Lower | Upper | ||||
| Medial peripheral cortical | −1185 | 512 | 6.1 | −1135 | 561 | −1236 | 497 | 101 | −8.2% | −516 | +719 | 0.727 | 0.20 |
| Medial epiphyseal cortical | −1410 | 601 | 4.2 | −1435 | 666 | −1385 | 582 | −50 | 3.6% | −778 | +678 | 0.883 | 0.08 |
| Medial metaphyseal cortical | −1130 | 418 | 4.7 | −1247 | 433 | −1014 | 399 | −233 | 23.0% | −718 | +252 | 0.316 | 0.56 |
| Medial subchondral cortical * | −563 | 203 | 5.6 | −536 | 258 | −512 | 143 | −16 | 3.1% | −258 | +164 | 0.949 | 0.28 |
| Medial subchondral trabecular * | −770 | 322 | 6.5 | −743 | 405 | −627 | 189 | −118 | 18.8% | −636 | +155 | 0.338 | 0.64 |
| Medial epiphyseal trabecular * | −2405 | 900 | 3.7 | −2294 | 1133 | −1990 | 599 | −281 | 14.1% | −1403 | +557 | 0.406 | 0.49 |
| Medial metaphyseal trabecular | −2166 | 933 | 4.7 | −2361 | 1096 | −1970 | 771 | −391 | 19.8% | −1494 | +712 | 0.455 | 0.42 |
| Subchondral spine * | −830 | 403 | 7.2 | −749 | 544 | −725 | 186 | −27 | 3.7% | −817 | +282 | 0.848 | 0.48 |
| Epiphyseal central | −2688 | 879 | 3.2 | −2873 | 1015 | −2503 | 752 | −370 | 14.8% | −1410 | +670 | 0.454 | 0.42 |
| Metaphyseal central | −1897 | 789 | 4.9 | −2053 | 921 | −1741 | 668 | −312 | 17.9% | −1248 | +625 | 0.482 | 0.39 |
| Lateral subchondral cortical | −862 | 330 | 6.4 | −914 | 410 | −809 | 249 | −106 | 13.1% | −500 | +289 | 0.571 | 0.32 |
| Lateral subchondral trabecular | −1321 | 447 | 5.2 | −1495 | 548 | −1148 | 249 | −347 | 30.2% | −843 | +149 | 0.154 | 0.78 |
| Lateral epiphyseal trabecular * | −2508 | 860 | 3.9 | −2434 | 1006 | −1979 | 611 | −559 | 28.2% | −1735 | +346 | 0.180 | 0.71 |
| Lateral metaphyseal trabecular | −1940 | 829 | 7.5 | −2080 | 948 | −1800 | 738 | −280 | 15.6% | −1269 | +709 | 0.549 | 0.34 |
| Lateral peripheral cortical * | −1157 | 492 | 5.7 | −933 | 657 | −964 | 236 | −10 | 1.0% | −953 | +194 | 0.848 | 0.50 |
| Lateral epiphyseal cortical | −1105 | 403 | 5.9 | −1181 | 475 | −1030 | 337 | −151 | 14.7% | −631 | +329 | 0.506 | 0.37 |
| Lateral metaphyseal cortical | −670 | 288 | 7.4 | −656 | 274 | −685 | 323 | 30 | −4.3% | −319 | +378 | 0.857 | 0.10 |
Mean and SD of repeated scans for both OA and normal, CV%RMS, mean/median and SD for OA knees, mean/median and SD for normal knees, the difference between OA and normal knees (mean and percent relative to normal), 95% confidence of interval, p-value, and effect size (Cohen’s d) of minimum principal strain in different regions of proximal tibia.
(*) shows regions which were not normally distributed whereby median value used in Mann-Whitney U-tests for statistical comparison, and confidence intervals were calculated using Hodges-Lehmann estimator.