Literature DB >> 31043545

Worldwide Expert Agreement on Updated Recommendations for the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis.

Jeska K de Vries-Bouwstra1,2, Yannick Allanore3,4, Marco Matucci-Cerinic3,4, Alexandra Balbir-Gurman3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate agreement of the updated European League Against Rheumatism and European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) recommendations for treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc) among international experts. In addition, to determine factors that might influence agreement.
METHODS: Level of agreement (10-point scale: 0 = not at all, 10 = completely agree) and local drug availability (yes/no) were assessed using an online survey. The Web link to the survey was shared with 481 unique e-mail addresses and SSc networks (Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium, Australian Scleroderma Interest Group, International Systemic Sclerosis Inception Cohort). Level of agreement was compared between subgroups stratified for participant characteristics.
RESULTS: In total, 263 experts participated, of whom n = 209 (79%) completed each single item. The majority were rheumatologists (n = 200, 76%) working in Europe (n = 185; 71%); 59% (n = 156) were EUSTAR members; and 57% (n = 151) had > 10 years of clinical experience. Overall level of agreement was high (mean 8.0, SD 2.5). The 3 highest mean agreements included (1) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for scleroderma renal crisis (9.2, SD 2.1); (2) blood pressure control in SSc-patients treated with corticosteroids (9.0, SD 2.2); (3) proton pump inhibitors to prevent reflux complications (9.0, SD 2.2). The 3 lowest mean agreements included (1) fluoxetine for Raynaud phenomenon (RP; 4.6, SD 2.8); (2) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for severe SSc (7.1, SD 2.9); (3) phosphodiesterase inhibitors 5 for RP (7.3, SD 2.7). Agreement differed between Europe and non-Europe for the use of iloprost, bosentan, methotrexate, HSCT, and cyclophosphamide. Treatment availability could partially explain differential agreement for iloprost, bosentan, and HSCT.
CONCLUSION: In general, worldwide expert agreement on updated recommendations for treatment of SSc is high, supporting their value. Differences in agreement are partially explained by geographical area and treatment availability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DRUG THERAPY; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31043545     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.181173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  2 in total

Review 1.  The need for a holistic approach for SSc-ILD - achievements and ambiguity in a devastating disease.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold; Yannick Allanore; Elisabeth Bendstrup; Cosimo Bruni; Oliver Distler; Toby M Maher; Marlies Wijsenbeek; Michael Kreuter
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 2.  Autologous Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Systemic Sclerosis: Focus on Interstitial Lung Disease.

Authors:  Gianluca Bagnato; Antonio Giovanni Versace; Daniela La Rosa; Alberta De Gaetano; Egidio Imbalzano; Marianna Chiappalone; Carmelo Ioppolo; William Neal Roberts; Alessandra Bitto; Natasha Irrera; Alessandro Allegra; Giovanni Pioggia; Sebastiano Gangemi
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.600

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.