Literature DB >> 31042505

Grading pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms by Ki-67 staining on cytology cell blocks: manual count and digital image analysis of 58 cases.

Ming Jin1, Rachel Roth2, Vera Gayetsky3, Nicholas Niederberger3, Amy Lehman4, Paul E Wakely3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Controversy remains as to whether Ki-67 labeling on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cell blocks (CBs) can be used to grade pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) reliably and what would be the best methodology for doing so.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search identified cases with both EUS-FNA and correlating surgical pathology (SP) available. 58 CBs (>100 tumor cells) were identified. Ki-67 labeling on CB was counted using both manual count (MC) and digital image analysis (DIA, ImmunoRatio software). The grades determined on CB were compared with those on corresponding SP reports (kappa statistics). The correct grading rates between MC and DIA were compared (McNemar's test). Total tumor cell number (TTCN, cutoffs: 500 and 2000) was used as a stratification factor (chi-square tests for trend).
RESULTS: Of 58 cases, the SP grade distribution was 31 grade 1, 23 grade 2, and 4 grade 3. Overall, the grading concordance of CB MC and SP was higher than that of CB DIA and SP (McNemar's P-value = 0.022). Compared with SP, CB MC correctly graded 69% (40 of 58) [κ = 0.44 (95% CI: 0.21, 0.66)]; CB DIA correctly graded 55% (32 of 58) [κ = 0.19 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.42)]. Grade 1 tumors had the highest concordance. Although the correct grading rate improved as TTCN increased, no statistical significance was found.
CONCLUSION: Although Ki-67 labeling on CB can be used to grade PanNENs, limitation exists, particularly for grade 2 tumors. The method of counting makes a difference: MC is more accurate than DIA. The major reasons of discordance include non-tumor cell contamination and insufficient sampling.
Copyright © 2016 American Society of Cytopathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell block; Digital image analysis; Grading; Ki-67; Manual count; Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm

Year:  2016        PMID: 31042505     DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2016.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Cytopathol        ISSN: 2213-2953


  4 in total

1.  Grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using Ki-67 index and 2017 World Health Organization criteria: An analysis of 32 cases.

Authors:  Sweety Kalantri; Pooja Bakshi; Kusum Verma
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.091

2.  Ki-67 Proliferation Index Assessment in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Digital Image Analysis With Stringent Case and Hotspot Level Concordance Requirements.

Authors:  Sarag A Boukhar; Matthew D Gosse; Andrew M Bellizzi; Anand Rajan K D
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Automated quantitative analysis of Ki-67 staining and HE images recognition and registration based on whole tissue sections in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Min Feng; Yang Deng; Libo Yang; Qiuyang Jing; Zhang Zhang; Lian Xu; Xiaoxia Wei; Yanyan Zhou; Diwei Wu; Fei Xiang; Yizhe Wang; Ji Bao; Hong Bu
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 4.  Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring.

Authors:  Claudio Luchini; Liron Pantanowitz; Volkan Adsay; Sylvia L Asa; Pietro Antonini; Ilaria Girolami; Nicola Veronese; Alessia Nottegar; Sara Cingarlini; Luca Landoni; Lodewijk A Brosens; Anna V Verschuur; Paola Mattiolo; Antonio Pea; Andrea Mafficini; Michele Milella; Muhammad K Niazi; Metin N Gurcan; Albino Eccher; Ian A Cree; Aldo Scarpa
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 8.209

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.