| Literature DB >> 31041895 |
Run Luo1, Leiqiong Xiang1, Haifeng Liu1, Zhijun Zhong1, Li Liu2, Lei Deng1, Ling Liu1, Xiangming Huang2, Ziyao Zhou1, Hualin Fu1, Yan Luo1, Guangneng Peng1.
Abstract
Enterocytozoon bieneusi is a common intestinal pathogen in a variety of animals. While E. bieneusi genotypes have become better-known, there are few reports on its prevalence in the Tibetan pig. This study investigated the prevalence, genetic diversity, and zoonotic potential of E. bieneusi in the Tibetan pig in southwestern China. Tibetan pig feces (266 samples) were collected from three sites in the southwest of China. Feces were subjected to PCR amplification of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. Enterocytozoon bieneusi was detected in 83 (31.2%) of Tibetan pigs from the three different sites, with 25.4% in Kangding, 56% in Yaan, and 26.7% in Qionglai. Prevalence varies according to age group, from 24.4% (age 0-1 years) to 44.4% (age 1-2 years). Four genotypes of E. bieneusi were identified: two known genotypes EbpC (n = 58), Henan-IV (n = 24) and two novel genotypes, SCT01 and SCT02 (one of each). We compare our results with a compilation of published results on the host range and geographical distribution of E. bieneusi genotypes in China. Phylogenetic analysis showed these four genotypes clustered to group 1 with zoonotic potential. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis of three microsatellites (MS1, MS3, MS7) and one minisatellite (MS4) was successful in 47, 48, 23 and 47 positive specimens and identified 10, 10, 5 and 5 genotypes at four loci, respectively. This study indicates the potential danger of E. bieneusi to Tibetan pigs in southwestern China, and offers basic advice for preventing and controlling infections. © R. Luo et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2019.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31041895 PMCID: PMC6492536 DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2019021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite ISSN: 1252-607X Impact factor: 3.000
Factors associated with prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Tibetan pigs in southwestern China.
| Factor | Category | No. tested | No. positive | (%)(95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | Kangding | 201 | 51 | 25.37 (0.193–0.314) | |
| Qionglai | 15 | 4 | 26.67 (0.013–0.520) | <0.01 | |
| Yaan | 50 | 28 | 56.00 (0.417–0.703) | ||
| Age (years) | 0–1 | 183 | 61 | 33.33 (0.264–0.402) | 0.318 |
| 1–2 | 53 | 22 | 41.51 (0.278–0.552) | ||
| Gender | Male | 82 | 47 | 57.32 (0.464–0.683) | 0.003 |
| Female | 184 | 36 | 19.57 (0.138–0.254) | ||
| Total | 266 | 83 | 31.20 (0.256–0.368) |
Occurrence and genotypes of E. bieneusi in Tibetan pigs from different cities in southwest China.
| Region | Farm ID | Prevalence (%) | Genotypes ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kangding | Farm 1 | 31/102 (30.40) | EbpC (18), Henan-IV ( |
| Farm 2 | 20/99 (20.20) | EbpC (12), Henan-IV ( | |
| Yaan | Farm 3 | 14/28 (50.00) | EbpC ( |
| Farm 4 | 10/22 (45.45) | EbpC ( | |
| Qionglai | Farm 5 | 4/15 (26.67) | EbpC ( |
| Total | 83/266 (31.20) | EbpC (58), Henan-IV ( |
Host ranges and geographical distribution of Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in this study in China.
| Genotype (synonym) | Host | Location | Isolate | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EbpC (E, Peru4, WL13, WL17) | Pig | Shanghai | 3 | [ |
| Pig | Heilongjiang | 10 | [ | |
| Pig | Heilongjiang | 3 | [ | |
| Pig | Heilongjiang | 3 | [ | |
| Pig | Jilin | 1 | [ | |
| Pig | Mongolia | 1 | [ | |
| Pig | Zhejiang | 39 | [ | |
| Pig | Guangdong | 17 | [ | |
| Pig | Yunnan | 31 | [ | |
| Tibetan pig | Sichuan | 58 | This study | |
| Red panda | Shanxi | 5 | [ | |
| Human | Shanghai | 1 | [ | |
| Human | Henan | 39 | [ | |
| Human | Heilongjiang | 11 | [ | |
| Human, pig, monkey | Guangxi | 4 | [ | |
| Squirrel | Sichuan | 3 | [ | |
| Wild boar | Sichuan | 85 | [ | |
| Nonhuman primates | Hebei | 1 | [ | |
| Nonhuman primates | Hubei | 3 | [ | |
| Nonhuman primates | Hunan | 4 | [ | |
| Nonhuman primates | Being | 2 | [ | |
| Nonhuman primates | Henan | 5 | [ | |
| Water | Shanghai | 37 | [ | |
| Wastewater | Shanghai | 2 | [ | |
| Wastewater | Shanghai | 2 | [ | |
| Wastewater | Shandong | 1 | [ | |
| Wastewater | Hubei | 5 | [ | |
| Camel | Xinjiang | 23 | [ | |
| Fox | Heilongjiang | 5 | [ | |
| Mink | Hebei | 4 | [ | |
| Mink | Liaoning | 3 | [ | |
| Mink | Jilin, Heilongjiang | 6 | [ | |
| Chicken | Heilongjiang | 2 | [ | |
| Flies | Henan | 1 | [ | |
| Dog | Heilongjiang | 2 | [ | |
| Dog | Shanxi | 1 | [ | |
| Cattle | Henan, Ningxia | 6 | [ | |
| Cattle | Hubei, Tianjin | 1 | [ | |
| Goat | Yunnan | 1 | [ | |
| Calve | Xinjiang | 2 | [ | |
| Deer | Henan | 4 | [ | |
| Deer | Henan | 3 | [ | |
| Deer | Jilin | 1 | [ | |
| Henan-IV | Human | Henan | 1 | [ |
| Human | Heilongjiang | 3 | [ | |
| Chicken | Jilin | 2 | [ | |
| Camel | Xinjiang | 1 | [ | |
| Horse | Xinjiang | 21 | [ | |
| Cattle | Xinjiang | 2 | [ | |
| Nonhuman primates | Hebei | 2 | [ | |
| Nonhuman primates | Shanxi | 1 | [ | |
| Nonhuman primates | Shanghai | 1 | [ | |
| Pig | Heilongjiang | 5 | [ | |
| Pig | Shanxi | 3 | [ | |
| Pig | Yunnan | 6 | [ | |
| Tibetan pig | Sichuan | 23 | This study | |
| SCT01 | Tibetan pig | Sichuan | 1 | This study |
| SCT02 | Tibetan pig | Sichuan | 1 | This study |
Figure 1.Phylogenetic relationship of Enterocytozoon bieneusi groups. The relationships between E. bieneusi genotypes identified in this study and other known genotypes deposited in the genbank were inferred by a neighbor-joining analysis of ITS sequences based on genetic distance by the Kimura-2-parameter model. The numbers on the branches represent percent bootstrapping values from 1000 replicates (only bootstrap values >50% are shown). Each sequence is identified by its accession number, genotype designation, and host origin. Genotypes with black triangles and open triangle are novel and known genotypes identified in this study, respectively.
Multilocus characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolates in Tibetan pigs in southwestern China.
| ITS genotype | Multilocus genotype | No. of MLGs | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS1 | MS3 | MS4 | MS7 | genbank accession nos. | MLGs | ||
| Henan-IV | Type II | Type I | Type III | Type II |
| MLG1 | 1 |
| Henan-IV | Type I | Type III | Type III | Type II |
| MLG2 | 1 |
| Henan-IV | Type I | Type I | Type II | Type I |
| MLG3 | 1 |
| Henan-IV | Type II | Type II | Type II | Type II |
| MLG4 | 2 |
| Ebpc | Type II | Type I | Type II | Type II |
| MLG5 | 2 |
| Ebpc | Type X | Type I | Type IV | Type I |
| MLG6 | 1 |
| Ebpc | Type I | Type I | Type II | Type II |
| MLG7 | 1 |
| Ebpc | Type II | Type I | Type I | Type IV |
| MLG8 | 1 |
| Ebpc | Type III | Type IV | Type I | Type III |
| MLG9 | 1 |
| Ebpc | Type I | Type IV | Type I | Type II |
| MLG10 | 1 |
Novel genotypes.