Literature DB >> 31041628

Selection and Characteristics of Patients with Peritoneal Dissemination from Appendiceal Cancer with Exceptional/Poor Survival After CRS/HIPEC.

Carlos Munoz-Zuluaga1, Mary Caitlin King1, Armando Sardi2, Panayotis Ledakis1, Michelle Sittig1, Carol Nieroda1, Ryan MacDonald3, Vadim Gushchin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survival in peritoneal dissemination from appendiceal cancer after complete cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) varies within each histopathologic subtype. Analyzing patients with unique responses may uncover the mechanisms behind their extreme outcomes. We proposed a method to identify retrospectively and to characterize patients who responded exceptionally well or very poorly within each histopathologic subtype.
METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with low-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei (LGMCP), high-grade MCP (HGMCP), and HGMCP with signet ring cells (HGMCP-S) with complete CRS/HIPEC (CC-0/1) was performed. Patients were divided by recurrence status. Median follow-up was calculated for each. Exceptional responders (ExR) were defined as alive without recurrence after median follow-up of the nonrecurrent group. Poor responders (PoR) were defined as disease recurrence before median follow-up of the recurrent group. Perioperative characteristics were analyzed.
RESULTS: LGMCP, HGMCP, and HGMCP-S had 48 (41%), 19 (23%), and 7 (14%) ExR and 11 (10%), 20 (24%), and 20 (39%) PoR, respectively. All ExR had lower median PCI (26 vs. 36 [p = 0.004]; 13 vs. 33.5 [p < 0.001]; 3 vs. 29.5 [p = 0.001]). Fewer LGMCP and HGMCP ExR had abnormal tumor markers (36% vs. 90% [p = 0.003]; 22% vs. 74% [p = 0.003]). More HGMCP and HGMCP-S ExR had CC-0 (vs. CC-1) cytoreductions (84% vs. 50%, p = 0.041; 100% vs. 40%, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: Stratifying patients by recurrence status and follow-up time successfully selects ExR and PoR within each histopathologic subtype. Perioperative characteristics of ExR versus PoR differ across histopathologic subtypes, except for disease burden. Genetic analysis may further elucidate differences and aid in the development of novel targeted therapies.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31041628     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07374-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  3 in total

1.  The Utility of Preoperative Tumor Markers in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Primary Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: an Analysis from the US HIPEC Collaborative.

Authors:  Nadege Fackche; Ryan K Schmocker; Boateng Kubi; Jordan M Cloyd; Ahmed Ahmed; Travis Grotz; Jennifer Leiting; Keith Fournier; Andrew J Lee; Benjamin Powers; Sean Dineen; Jula Veerapong; Joel M Baumgartner; Callisia Clarke; T Clark Gamblin; Sameer H Patel; Vikrom Dhar; Ryan J Hendrix; Laura Lambert; Daniel E Abbott; Courtney Pokrzywa; Kelly Lafaro; Byrne Lee; Mohammad Y Zaidi; Shishir K Maithel; Fabian M Johnston; Jonathan B Greer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Iterative Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Recurrent Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix.

Authors:  Felipe Lopez-Ramirez; Vadim Gushchin; Michelle Sittig; Mary Caitlin King; Ekaterina Baron; Andrei Nikiforchin; Carol Nieroda; Armando Sardi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Current Trends in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Disease from Appendiceal and Colorectal Malignancies.

Authors:  Megan M Harper; Joseph Kim; Prakash K Pandalai
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.