| Literature DB >> 31040732 |
Vanessa C Stubbs1, Lauren E Miller2, Arjun K Parasher1,3, Jordan T Glicksman1,4, Nithin D Adappa1, James Palmer1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (NA) characteristically affects adolescent men. Although benign, these tumors can cause local destruction and surgical resection is warranted.Entities:
Keywords: elderly; nasopharyngeal angiofibroma; vascular tumor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31040732 PMCID: PMC6480991 DOI: 10.1177/1179547619841062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Med Insights Case Rep ISSN: 1179-5476
Characteristics of prior reports of nasopharyngeal angiofibroma in elderly patients.
| Reference | Publication year | Patient age | Sex | Imaging and histology features | Resection and follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhang et al[ | 2015 | 72 | Male | CT demonstrated highly vascular nasopharyngeal mass, and histopathology demonstrated proliferating vasculature in a fibrous stroma consistent with angiofibroma | Endoscopy-assisted sublabial and buccolabial approach with preoperative embolization and incomplete resection followed by subsequent resection and no recurrence at 6 months |
| Conley et al[ | 1968 | 79 | Male | No histology confirmation | Open transpalatine approach |
| Ewing and Shively[ | 1981 | 71 | Female | N/A; histology indicated angiofibroma | Lateral rhinotomy and antrotomy, no recurrence at 2-year follow-up |
| Shaheen[ | 1930 | 70 | Male | No histology confirmation | Open approach via Moure’s lateral rhinotomy incision |
| Szymanska et al[ | 2006 | 57 | Female | CT and MRI demonstrated right nasopharyngeal mass with nasal septum erosion and without ethmoid, sphenoid, or maxillary sinus wall erosion | Preoperative internal maxillary artery embolization with sublabial degloving approach, follow-up at 6 years without recurrence |
| Ralli et al[ | 2018 | 68 | Female | MRI demonstrated a polypoid lesion in posterior nasal cavity without invasion of the roof or posterior wall | Endoscopic and complete resection without recurrence at 3 years |
CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; N/A, not available.
Figure 1.Preoperative T1-weighted, coronal and axial, post-contrast MRI images illustrating extension into pterygopalatine fossa (A, B) and cavernous sinus involvement (C).
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 2.Preoperative interventional neuroradiology embolization. Coronal (1) and sagittal (2) images displaying angiogram pre-embolization (A) illustrating blush of lesion’s vasculature, during embolization (B) illustrating the wire used, and post-embolization (C) showing a decrease in vascular flow.
Figure 3.Postoperative, axial and coronal, T1-weighted, post-contrast MRI image showing residual tumor in the right posterior orbit (A) and cavernous sinus (B).
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Unique features and considerations of nasopharyngeal angiofibroma staging systems.
| Classification system | Snyderman et al/UPMC[ | Onerci et al[ | Radkowski et al[ | Andrews et al[ | Chandler et al[ | Sessions et al[ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stages | I-V | I-IV | Ia-IIIb | I-IVb | I-IV | I-III |
| Unique features | Includes route of intracranial extension and vascularity of the tumor; acknowledges paranasal sinus involvement not impediment to surgical excision; strong correlation between staging and number of operations, residual tumor | Includes tumor extension posterior to the pterygoid plates as a higher risk factor due to surgical challenge; considers endoscopic approach in staging | A modification of Session’s classification; first to propose a system that highlighted the presence of extension posterior to the pterygoid plates as a higher risk factor | Notes surgical treatment up to stages IVa whereas radiotherapy recommended for managing IVb lesions | Combines clinical and radiographic features; any intracranial extension is stage IV | First staging system; any intracranial extension is stage III |
| Considerations | Assumes that almost all tumors will undergo preoperative embolization; designed based on patients who underwent endoscopic resection | Does not consider vascularity of the tumor | Does not account for endoscopic technique | Does not account for endoscopic technique | Does not account for the degree of skull base involvement; does not account for endoscopic technique | Does not account for the degree of skull base involvement; does not incorporate preoperative imaging studies |