| Literature DB >> 31040585 |
Rajani Ganpatrao Tumane1, Nirmalendu Nath1, Aqueel Khan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Manifestation of certain health morbidity in copper dust-exposed subjects impels us to obtain a cogent view regarding the implicate relationship of immunoglobulin on health risk assessment in them. We present here immunological profile of copper pit worker and office employees residing in the vicinity. Rationale of this study is to delineate the risk factors involved for copper toxicity.Entities:
Keywords: Copper; epidemiology; immunoglobulins; metal mine toxicity; occupational exposure and potential markers
Year: 2019 PMID: 31040585 PMCID: PMC6477944 DOI: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_116_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Occup Environ Med ISSN: 0973-2284
Immunoglobulin parameters in all study groups after adjustment
| Characteristics | Groups | Pair-wise comparisons‡ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls ( | Office employees ( | Miner-II ( | Control versus office employees | Control versus Miner-II | Office employees versus Miner-II | ||
| Ig parameters | |||||||
| IgG (mg/dL) | 524.55+320.51 | 568.4+417.18 | 1172.82+493.23 | <0.0001*** | 0.9045 | <0.0001*** | <0.0001*** |
| IgM (mg/dL) | 247.17+123.48 | 162.16+99.32 | 83.87+51.84 | <0.0001*** | 0.0001*** | <0.0001*** | <0.0001*** |
| IgA (mg/dL) | 198.09+109.52 | 232.94+137.52 | 394.27+149.98 | <0.0001*** | 0.5312 | <0.0001*** | <0.0001*** |
| IgE (IU/mL) | 235.12+136.37 | 356.5+226.91 | 393.67+259.09 | 0.0073 | 0.0636 | 0.0051* | 0.6644 |
Ig: Immunoglobulin; BMI: Body mass index; ANOVA: Analysis of variance. †Adjusted for age, bmi, smoking, tobacco and alcohol; *P-value obtained using one way ANOVA; ‡Tukey’s post hoc comparisons Bold numbers indicate statistical significance. *denotes P value less than < 0.05 as considered statistically significant . **denotes P value less than < 0.001as considered highly significant . *** denotes P value less than < 0.0001as considered extremely significant.
Blood metal analysis in various study groups post adjustment with confounder
| Biochemical parameters | Groups | Pair-wise comparisons‡ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls ( | Office workers ( | Miners-II ( | Control versus office workers | Control versus Miner-II | Office workers versus Miner-II | ||
| Cu (mg/L) | 0.66+0.34 | 2.14+0.84 | 2.22+0.79 | 0.0001*** | 0.0001*** | 0.0001*** | 0.8206 |
| Mn (mg/L) | 1.09+0.65 | 1.89+1.35 | 2.09+1.85 | 0.0118* | 0.0674 | 0.0087* | 0.7686 |
| Zn (mg/L) | 7.31+1.19 | 8.44+2.46 | 8.1+3.01 | 0.1699 | 0.1482 | 0.3385 | 0.7618 |
BMI: Body mass index; Cu: Copper; Mn: Manganese; Zn: Zinc; ANOVA: Analysis of variance. †Adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, tobacco, and alcohol; *P-value obtained using one-way ANOVA; ‡Tukey’s post hoc comparisons; values in bold indicate statistical significance, *P<0.05 considered as statistically significant, **P<0.001 considered as highly significant, ***P<0.0001 considered as extremely significant
Figure 1Positive correlation between IgE and copper
Figure 2Positive correlation between IgG and copper
Figure 3Positive correlation between IgA and copper
Figure 4Negative correlation between IgM and copper
Figure 5Positive correlation between IgG and manganese
Figure 6Negative correlation between IgM and zinc
Pearson’s correlation between metals and immunoglobulin parameters
| Ig parameters | Correlation coefficient ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | Mn | Zn | |
| IgG (mg/dL) | 0.28 (0.001)** | 0.18 (0.03)* | −0.004 (0.96) |
| IgM (mg/dL) | −0.39 (<0.0001)*** | −0.10 (0.24) | −0.20 (0.01)* |
| IgA (mg/dl) | 0.21 (0.01)* | 0.09 (0.27) | −0.03 (0.68) |
| IgE (IU/mL) | 0.39 (<0.0001)*** | 0.14 (0.08) | 0.01 (0.90) |
Ig: Immunoglobulin; Cu: Copper; Mn: Manganese; Zn: zinc. *P value less than < 0.05 as considered statistically significant, **P value less than < 0.001as considered highly significant, ***P value less than < 0.0001as considered extremely significant
Odds ratio for different immunological parameters after adjusting for covariates using logistic regression*
| Ig parameters | OR (95% CI) ( | Classification accuracy (%) | HL test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | Mn | Zn | |||
| IgG | 0.66 (0.42-1.04) 0.07 | 1.09 (0.85-1.38) 0.5 | 1.06 (0.91-1.24) 0.42 | 62.16 | 0.4433 |
| IgM | 0.59 (0.35-0.98) 0.04 | 0.92 (0.70-1.21) 0.57 | 0.95 (0.79-1.14) 0.58 | 70.27 | 0.6877 |
| IgA | 1.45 (0.82-2.57) 0.2 | 0.93 (0.69-1.23) 0.6 | 1.00 (0.82-1.22) 0.99 | 81.08 | 0.1729 |
| IgE | 2.77 (1.36-5.63) 0.004 | 1.39 (0.81-2.37) 0.23 | 0.74 (0.58-0.93) 0.01 | 85.81 | 0.7998 |
*Cut-offs of respective parameters have been used to determine the odds ratio. HL: Hosmer-Lemeshow test, Cu: Copper, Mn: Manganese, Zn: Zinc, OR: Odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval, Ig: Immunoglobulin. *denotes P value less than < 0.05 as considered statistically significant . **denotes P value less than < 0.001as considered highly significant.