| Literature DB >> 31040576 |
Nadia G M Ali1, Ibrahim M Aboyadak1, Heba S El-Sayed2.
Abstract
AIM: This study aimed to identify the pathogenic bacteria responsible for the septicemic disease affecting white sea bream brooders and determining the sensitivity of the recovered isolates to different antibiotics followed by estimation of long-acting oxytetracycline (OTC) efficacy in controlling this disease, and finally, determining the proper dose regimen.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus cereus; Staphylococcus epidermidis; high-performance liquid chromatography; histopathology; oxytetracycline; sensitivity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31040576 PMCID: PMC6460867 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.316-324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Figure-1(a and b) Naturally infected white sea bream (Diplodus sargus) showing scale desquamation, skin ulceration even complete loss of skin, and appearance of musculature with congestion and hemorrhage in caudal peduncle together with tail erosion and hemorrhages. (c and d) Biolog GEN III microplate showing the biochemical profile of Staphylococcus epidermidis (c) and Bacillus cereus (d). (e) Gram-stained S. epidermidis appeared as Gram-positive cocci, 0.65-0.91 µm in diameter, present as single, pairs, and clusters. (f) Gram-stained B. cereus appeared as Gram-positive spore-forming long bacilli, 4.97-7.48 µm in length and 1.58-1.64 in width, arranged in short or long chains. (g) S. epidermidis colonies on Tryptic Soy Agar appeared as white pinpoint colonies about 0.2-1 mm in diameter.)h) B. cereus colonies on Tryptic Soy Agar appeared as large white granular colonies with irregular perimeters about 1.5-5 mm in diameter. (i) Antibiogram indicated the sensitivity of B. cereus to oxytetracycline (OTC), ciprofloxacin (CIP), enrofloxacin (ENR), florfenicol (F), and spiramycin (SP), while it resists erythromycin (E). (j) Antibiogram indicated the sensitivity of S. epidermidis to OTC, CIP, ENR, F, SP, and E.
Number of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Bacillus cereus isolates from each organ of diseased white sea bream (Diplodus sargus) broodstock.
| Organ of isolation | Number of | Number of |
|---|---|---|
| Muscle | 5 | 5 |
| Eye | 1 | 1 |
| Heart | 4 | 0 |
| Tail | 5 | 5 |
| Total | 15 | 11 |
Figure-2Histopathological lesions induced by Staphylococcus epidermidis and Bacillus cereus infection in affected white sea bream (Diplodus sargus). (a-c) Hepatopancreas showing loss of normal tissue architecture, presence of necrotic areas (N) with mononuclear cell infiltration (arrow), congested hepatic sinusoids (*) and congested distended blood vessels (C), hematoxylin and eosin (H and E), X=400 in (a and b) and 100 in (c). (d-f) Posterior kidney showing glomerular hypertrophy with narrow Bowman’s space (brown arrow), degenerated shrinkage glomerular taught (gray arrow), detached tubular epithelium (T), interstitial mononuclear cell infiltration (L), melanomacrophage centers activation (M), H and E, X=100 in (d) and 100 in (e and f). (g) Eye with marked separation between retina layers, especially, pigment epithelium layer (red arrow) which also is corrugated and the photoreceptor layer (F), (C) is the choroid body, H and E, X=100. (h-j) Skin showing destruction of epidermis even complete loss (D) with exposure of dermis (E) and presence of leukocytic infiltration (I), in less affected cases loss of the superficial layer of the stratified squamous epithelium (S), H and E, X=100 in (h and i) and 400 in (j).
Antibiotics susceptibility test results for Staphylococcus epidermidis and Bacillus cereus.
| Antibiotic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibition zone mm | Interpretation | Inhibition zone mm | Interpretation | |
| OTC 30 μg | 22 | Susceptible | 21 | Susceptible |
| CIP 5 μg | 27 | Susceptible | 26 | Susceptible |
| ENR 5 μg | 24 | Susceptible | 22 | Susceptible |
| F 10 μg | 24 | Susceptible | 27 | Susceptible |
| SP 100 μg | 21 | Susceptible | 17 | Susceptible |
| E 15 μg | 19 | Susceptible | 11 | Resistant |
OTC=Oxytetracycline, CIP=Ciprofloxacin, ENR=Enrofloxacin, F=Florfenicol, SP=Spiramycin, E=Erythromycin
MIC of oxytetracycline.
| Bacterial strain | Isolate Number | MIC of oxytetracycline μg/ml | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | <0.125 | Susceptible | |
| 2 | 16 | Resistant | |
| 3 | 32 | Resistant | |
| 4 | 8 | Intermediate | |
| 5 | 32 | Resistant | |
| 6 | 0.5 | Susceptible | |
| 7 | 32 | Resistant | |
| 8 | 8 | Intermediate | |
| 9 | 4 | Susceptible | |
| 10 | <0.125 | Susceptible | |
| 11 | 4 | Susceptible | |
| 12 | 0.125 | Susceptible | |
| 13 | 0.5 | Susceptible | |
| 14 | 0.125 | Susceptible | |
| 15 | 4 | Susceptible | |
| 1 | <0.125 | Susceptible | |
| 2 | <0.125 | Susceptible | |
| 3 | 2 | Susceptible | |
| 4 | <0.125 | Susceptible | |
| 5 | 1 | Susceptible | |
| 6 | 1 | Susceptible | |
| 7 | 1 | Susceptible | |
| 8 | 1 | Susceptible | |
| 9 | 4 | Susceptible | |
| 10 | 0.25 | Susceptible | |
| 11 | 0.25 | Susceptible |
Interpretation: Susceptible ≤4, Intermediate=8, Resistant ≥16 μg/ml. MIC=Minimum inhibitory concentration
Oxytetracycline levels in the serum of white sea bream (Diplodus sargus) broodstock at different time points post-treatment.
| Sampling time (h postinjection) | Oxytetracycline level (μg/ml) |
|---|---|
| 24 | 34.57±1.09 |
| 48 | 25.98±0.96 |
| 72 | 20.39±1.2 |
| 96 | 13.10±0.32 |
| 120 | 10.04±0.26 |
| 144 | 7.68±0.42 |
| 168 | 5.14±0.23 |
n=6, values are mean±standard error