Mustafa Kadihasanoglu1, Mustafa Aydin2, Mehmet Taskiran3, Muammer Kendirci4. 1. Department of Urology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, kadihasanoglu@gmail.com. 2. Department of Urology, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey. 3. MMT Amerikan Hastanesi, Gaziantep, Turkey. 4. Department of Urology, Liv Hospital Ulus, Istinye University, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although prostate cancer releases more prostate-specific antigen (PSA) per unit of prostate volume (PV), data are limited regarding the association between intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) and the PSA level. OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to evaluate the IPP effect in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHOD: This study included patients with (n = 119) and without (n = 121) IPP. The age, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), PSA level, maximum and average flow rates, PV, hematuria, urinary retention, and post-void residual (PVR) volume were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean ages were similar between the 2 groups (66.56 ± 8.67 and 66.92 ± 8.7 years, respectively, p = 0.747), and there were no statistically significant differences in the IPSS, maximum and average flow rates, hematuria, PVR volume, and urinary retention means (p > 0.05). However, the IPP patients had lower total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) levels than those without IPP (3.55 [4.18] vs. 5.26 [5.24] ng/mL, p = 0.013 and 0.7 [1.09] vs. 1.05 [1.23] ng/mL, p = 0.029, respectively). Moreover, there were strong positive correlations between the IPP grade and the tPSA and fPSA levels (r = 0.262, p = 0.001 and r = 0.254, p = 0.002 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that IPP results in a decreased PSA level, even with a higher PV.
BACKGROUND: Although prostate cancer releases more prostate-specific antigen (PSA) per unit of prostate volume (PV), data are limited regarding the association between intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) and the PSA level. OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to evaluate the IPP effect in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHOD: This study included patients with (n = 119) and without (n = 121) IPP. The age, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), PSA level, maximum and average flow rates, PV, hematuria, urinary retention, and post-void residual (PVR) volume were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean ages were similar between the 2 groups (66.56 ± 8.67 and 66.92 ± 8.7 years, respectively, p = 0.747), and there were no statistically significant differences in the IPSS, maximum and average flow rates, hematuria, PVR volume, and urinary retention means (p > 0.05). However, the IPP patients had lower total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) levels than those without IPP (3.55 [4.18] vs. 5.26 [5.24] ng/mL, p = 0.013 and 0.7 [1.09] vs. 1.05 [1.23] ng/mL, p = 0.029, respectively). Moreover, there were strong positive correlations between the IPP grade and the tPSA and fPSA levels (r = 0.262, p = 0.001 and r = 0.254, p = 0.002 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that IPP results in a decreased PSA level, even with a higher PV.