Literature DB >> 31039441

Progress, challenges and opportunities in fish vaccine development.

Alexandra Adams1.   

Abstract

In 2014 the contribution of aquaculture to supply food for human consumption overtook wild-caught fish for the first time. Despite improvements in the aquaculture industry, it has been estimated that as much as 10% of all cultured aquatic animals are lost because of infectious diseases, amounting to >10 billion USD in losses annually on a global scale. Vaccination to prevent disease is used routinely in finfish aquaculture, especially for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), while in a limited capacity (or not at all) in many other fish species due to lack of vaccines, poor performance or cost. There has, nevertheless, been impressive progress in fish vaccine development over the last 4 decades with 24 licenced fish vaccines now commercially available for use in a variety of fish species. These comprise whole killed, peptide subunit, recombinant protein, DNA and live attenuated vaccines. Challenges do, however, still exist as the majority of commercial vaccines are killed whole cell pathogen preparations administered by intraperitoneal injection. This may not be the optimal route to deliver some vaccines, but lack of effective adjuvants and basic knowledge on immune response has hindered progress in the development of mucosal vaccines. The cost of injecting fish may also be prohibitive in some countries leading to disease treatment (e.g. with antibiotics) rather than using preventative measures. It is important that these issues are addressed as the industry continues to grow globally. Exciting opportunities exist for rapid development of fish vaccines in the future, with continued reduction in cost of technologies (e.g. of whole genome sequencing), regulations changing (e.g. DNA vaccines can now authorised in Europe), the introduction of novel antigen expression and delivery systems (such as virus-like particles, VLPs), development of novel adjuvants and advancements in the elucidation of basic mechanisms of mucosal immunity. Development of effective mucosal vaccines and optimisation of their delivery will facilitate novel vaccine development, and enable the aquaculture industries in LMIC to use vaccination routinely in the future. In addition, effective use of emergency (autogenous) vaccines will assist in tackling emerging disease challenges.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fish health management; Fish vaccines; Mucosal vaccines; Vaccine administration; Vaccine development

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31039441     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.04.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol        ISSN: 1050-4648            Impact factor:   4.581


  38 in total

1.  Characterization of vB_VpaP_MGD2, a newly isolated bacteriophage with biocontrol potential against multidrug-resistant Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

Authors:  Yanzi Cao; Yujie Zhang; Weiqing Lan; Xiaohong Sun
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.574

2.  Fundamentals of Fish Vaccination.

Authors:  Megha Kadam Bedekar; Sajal Kole
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 3.  Challenges in Veterinary Vaccine Development.

Authors:  Sunil Thomas; Ann Abraham; Alina Rodríguez-Mallon; Sasimanas Unajak; John P Bannantine
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Display of Streptococcus iniae α-Enolase on the Surface of Virus-Like Particles (VLPs) of Nervous Necrosis Virus (NNV) Using SpyTag/SpyCatcher.

Authors:  Jeong In Yang; Ki Hong Kim
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 5.  A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture.

Authors:  Rosamond L Naylor; Ronald W Hardy; Alejandro H Buschmann; Simon R Bush; Ling Cao; Dane H Klinger; David C Little; Jane Lubchenco; Sandra E Shumway; Max Troell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Mucosal immunoglobulins of teleost fish: A decade of advances.

Authors:  Irene Salinas; Álvaro Fernández-Montero; Yang Ding; J Oriol Sunyer
Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Haemato-immunological responses and effectiveness of feed-based bivalent vaccine against Streptococcus iniae and Aeromonas hydrophila infections in hybrid red tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus × O. niloticus).

Authors:  Md Shirajum Monir; Sabri Bin Mohd Yusoff; Zarirah Binti Mohamed Zulperi; Hasliza Binti Abu Hassim; Aslah Mohamad; Muhamad Sofie Bin Mohd Hafiz Ngoo; Md Yasin Ina-Salwany
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Malate enhances survival of zebrafish against Vibrio alginolyticus infection in the same manner as taurine.

Authors:  Man-Jun Yang; Di Xu; Dai-Xiao Yang; Lu Li; Xuan-Xian Peng; Zhuang-Gui Chen; Hui Li
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 5.882

Review 9.  A Review of Fish Vaccine Development Strategies: Conventional Methods and Modern Biotechnological Approaches.

Authors:  Jie Ma; Timothy J Bruce; Evan M Jones; Kenneth D Cain
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-11-16

10.  Systems-thinking approach to identify and assess feasibility of potential interventions to reduce antibiotic use in tilapia farming in Egypt.

Authors:  Andrew P Desbois; Maria Garza; Mahmoud Eltholth; Yamen M Hegazy; Ana Mateus; Alexandra Adams; David C Little; Erling Høg; Chadag Vishnumurthy Mohan; Shimaa E Ali; Lucy A Brunton
Journal:  Aquaculture       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.