Literature DB >> 31039379

Retrosplenial cortex damage produces retrograde and anterograde context amnesia using strong fear conditioning procedures.

Danielle I Fournier1, Meghan C Eddy2, Nicole E DeAngeli2, Roman Huszár2, David J Bucci3.   

Abstract

Contextual fear conditioning relies upon a network of cortical and subcortical structures, including the hippocampus and the retrosplenial cortex (RSC). However, the contribution of the hippocampus is parameter-dependent. For example, with "weak" training procedures, lesions of the hippocampus produce both retrograde and anterograde context amnesia. However, with "strong" training procedures (e.g., more trials and/or higher levels of footshock), lesions of the hippocampus produce retrograde context amnesia but not anterograde amnesia (Wiltgen et al., 2006). Likewise, prior studies have shown that with weak training, RSC lesions produce both retrograde and anterograde context amnesia (Keene & Bucci, 2008). The purpose of the current study was to examine the effects of RSC damage on contextual fear conditioning following strong training. In Experiment 1, lesions of the RSC resulted in both retrograde and anterograde context amnesia following strong training using the same unsignaled fear conditioning procedures described by Wiltgen et al. (2006). In Experiment 2, using a signaled fear conditioning procedure, we replicated these effects on context memory observing both retrograde and anterograde context amnesia. In contrast, there were no lesion effects on tone-fear memory. Thus, unlike lesions of the hippocampus, lesions of RSC produce both retrograde and anterograde context amnesia even when rats undergo strong fear conditioning. These findings suggest that the RSC has an essential role in contextual fear conditioning and that other systems or pathways are unable to compensate for the loss of RSC function.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Associative learning; Memory; Over-Training; Parahippocampal

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31039379      PMCID: PMC6551208          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  29 in total

1.  NMDA receptors in retrosplenial cortex are necessary for retrieval of recent and remote context fear memory.

Authors:  Kevin A Corcoran; Michael D Donnan; Natalie C Tronson; Yomayra F Guzmán; Can Gao; Vladimir Jovasevic; Anita L Guedea; Jelena Radulovic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The ventral hippocampus supports a memory representation of context and contextual fear conditioning: implications for a unitary function of the hippocampus.

Authors:  Jerry W Rudy; Patricia Matus-Amat
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Context fear learning in the absence of the hippocampus.

Authors:  Brian J Wiltgen; Matthew J Sanders; Stephan G Anagnostaras; Jennifer R Sage; Michael S Fanselow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Contributions of the retrosplenial and posterior parietal cortices to cue-specific and contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  Christopher S Keene; David J Bucci
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Neurotoxic lesions of retrosplenial cortex disrupt signaled and unsignaled contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  Christopher S Keene; David J Bucci
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  The basolateral amygdala is necessary for learning but not relearning extinction of context conditioned fear.

Authors:  Vincent Laurent; Alain R Marchand; R Frederick Westbrook
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Extinguishing trace fear engages the retrosplenial cortex rather than the amygdala.

Authors:  Janine L Kwapis; Timothy J Jarome; Jonathan L Lee; Marieke R Gilmartin; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Identification of functional circuitry between retrosplenial and postrhinal cortices during fear conditioning.

Authors:  Siobhan Robinson; Caroline E Poorman; Thomas J Marder; David J Bucci
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Neurotoxic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus and Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats.

Authors:  S Maren; G Aharonov; M S Fanselow
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Making context memories independent of the hippocampus.

Authors:  Hugo Lehmann; Fraser T Sparks; Simon C Spanswick; Crystal Hadikin; Robert J McDonald; Robert J Sutherland
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.460

View more
  4 in total

1.  The circadian clock gene Per1 modulates context fear memory formation within the retrosplenial cortex in a sex-specific manner.

Authors:  Mark W Urban; Chenyu Lo; Kasuni K Bodinayake; Chad A Brunswick; Shoko Murakami; Ashley C Heimann; Janine L Kwapis
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Optogenetic inhibition of either the anterior or posterior retrosplenial cortex disrupts retrieval of a trace, but not delay, fear memory.

Authors:  Sydney Trask; Nicole C Ferrara; Kevin Grisales; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Peering into the Brain through the Retrosplenial Cortex to Assess Cognitive Function of the Injured Brain.

Authors:  Helen Motanis; Laila N Khorasani; Christopher C Giza; Neil G Harris
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2021-12-02

4.  Extinction and discrimination in a Bayesian model of context fear conditioning (BaconX).

Authors:  Franklin B Krasne; Raphael Zinn; Bryce Vissel; Michael S Fanselow
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 3.899

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.