Literature DB >> 31038672

Impella 5.0 therapy as a bridge-to-decision option for patients on extracorporeal life support with unclear neurological outcomes.

Alexander M Bernhardt1, Svante Zipfel1, Beate Reiter1, Samer Hakmi1, Liesa Castro1, Gerold Söffker2, Stefan Kluge2, Edith Lubos3, Meike Rybczinski3, Hanno Grahn3, Benedikt Schrage3, Peter Moritz Becher3, Markus J Barten1, Dirk Westermann3, Stefan Blankenberg3, Hermann Reichenspurner1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for the treatment of cardiogenic shock has shown to improve survival but is associated with complications. However, if the patient cannot be weaned from ECLS, their therapy options are limited. Although durable left ventricular assist device implantation might be an option in such cases, an unclear neurological outcome is often a contraindication. We hypothesize that Impella 5.0 therapy provides sufficient circulatory support while avoiding ECLS-related complications, thereby allowing for an adequate evaluation of a patient's neurological state and facilitating further treatment options.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 22 ECLS patients (mean age 56.5 ± 10.7 years) with an unclear neurological status who underwent Impella 5.0 implantation between January 2016 and July 2018 in our institution. Neurological status was evaluated on a daily basis using the cerebral performance category score and the modified Rankin scale.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients (72.7%) were resuscitated before ECLS implantation and 13 patients (59.1%) had acute myocardial infarction. The mean duration on ECLS before Impella 5.0 implantation was 9.3 ± 1.7 days. All patients were successfully weaned from ECLS by Impella 5.0 implantation via the axillary artery. The mean duration on Impella 5.0 was 16.3 ± 4.7 days. In surviving patients, both quantitative measurements of cerebral performance improved after 30 days compared to the baseline (P < 0.01). Six patients (27.3%) were bridged to a durable left ventricular assist device. In 9 patients (40.9%), myocardial function recovered during Impella 5.0 support and the device was successfully explanted. The 30-day survival rate was 68.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: Impella 5.0 support provides a bridge-to-decision option for patients following ECLS implantation and leads to left ventricular unloading. It allows further evaluation of a patient's neurological situation and facilitates further therapy. About two-thirds of patients survived with acceptable neurological outcomes.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiogenic shock; ECMO; Impella; Mechanical circulatory support; Neurological outcome; Short-term mechanical circulatory support; Survival

Year:  2019        PMID: 31038672     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

1.  Acute Cardiac Unloading and Recovery: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Acute Cardiac Unloading and REcovery (A-CURE) symposium held on 14 December 2020.

Authors: 
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-23

Review 2.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Alexander M Bernhardt; Benedikt Schrage; Ines Schroeder; Georg Trummer; Dirk Westermann; Hermann Reichenspurner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 8.251

3.  Escalation and de-escalation of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Letizia F Bertoldi; Clement Delmas; Patrick Hunziker; Federico Pappalardo
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 1.803

4.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation evolution: Left ventricular unloading strategies.

Authors:  Alexander M Bernhardt; Benedikt Schrage; Dirk Westermann; Hermann Reichenspurner
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-10-27

5.  Impella 5.0 supported oncological surgery as bridge to LVAD.

Authors:  Andrea Montisci; Giancarlo Micheletto; Serena Sibilio; Francesco Donatelli; Maurizio Tespili; Carlo Banfi; Francesco Casilli; Daniele Cosseta; Antonio Miceli; Silvia Cirri; Federico Pappalardo
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-11-07

6.  New Surgical Circulatory Support System Outcomes.

Authors:  Danny Ramzy; Edward Soltesz; Mark Anderson
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.826

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.