Literature DB >> 31038177

Electrocardiographic optimization techniques in resynchronization therapy.

Margarida Pujol-López1, Rodolfo San Antonio1,2, Lluís Mont1,2,3, Emilce Trucco4, José María Tolosana1,2,3, Elena Arbelo1,2,3, Eduard Guasch1,2,3, Edwin Kevin Heist5, Jagmeet P Singh5.   

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone of therapy for patients with heart failure, reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, and a wide QRS complex. However, not all patients respond to CRT: 30% of CRT implanted patients are currently considered clinical non-responders and up to 40% do not achieve LV reverse remodelling. In order to achieve the best CRT response, appropriate patient selection, device implantation, and programming are important factors. Optimization of CRT pacing intervals may improve results, increasing the number of responders, and the magnitude of the response. Echocardiography is considered the reference method for atrioventricular and interventricular (VV) intervals optimization but it is time-consuming, complex and it has a large interobserver and intraobserver variability. Previous studies have linked QRS shortening to clinical response, echocardiographic improvement and favourable prognosis. In this review, we describe the electrocardiographic optimization methods available: 12-lead electrocardiogram; fusion-optimized intervals (FOI); intracardiac electrogram-based algorithms; and electrocardiographic imaging. Fusion-optimized intervals is an electrocardiographic method of optimizing CRT based on QRS duration that combines fusion with intrinsic conduction. The FOI method is feasible and fast, further reduces QRS duration, can be performed during implant, improves acute haemodynamic response, and achieves greater LV remodelling compared with nominal programming of CRT. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Fusion-optimized intervals; Optimization; Reverse remodelling

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31038177     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euz126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  3 in total

1.  Determinants of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  John D Allison; Yitschak Biton; Theofanie Mela
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2022-05-15

2.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy with intraoperative epicardial mapping via minithoracotomy: 10 years' experience.

Authors:  László Hejjel; Marianna Németh; László Melczer; Attila Kónyi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Optimization of Chronic Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Fusion Pacing Algorithm Improves Echocardiographic Response.

Authors:  Ahmed AlTurki; Pedro Y Lima; Martin L Bernier; Daniel Garcia; Alejandro Vidal; Bruno Toscani; Sergio Diaz; Mauricio Montemezzo; Alaa Al-Dossari; Tomy Hadjis; Jacqueline Joza; Vidal Essebag
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-01-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.