AIM: To compare surgical, functional and early survival outcomes for robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction in patients age = 75 y to those in patients age < 75 y using Propensity Score Matching. METHODS: We collected data from 15 patients age = 75 y from among 60 consecutive RARC with ONB reconstruction performed at our institution from January 2015 to July 2018. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon after modular training under the supervision of a skilled surgeon. Demographic, surgical, functional and survival data were prospectively collected and compared to the corresponding data from 15 patients from the same series age < 75 y, matched according to the ASA score, body mass index, clinical stage and associated carcinoma in situ using Propensity Score Matching. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to preoperative parameters, such as ASA score, BMI and preoperative stage. The same homogeneity was found for intraoperative parameters, such as operation time, number of nodes retrieved and ONB time. The only statistically significant difference noted was in the percentage of nerve-sparing procedures, which was higher in the younger patient group (p < 0.001). The percentages of early and late postoperative complications were higher in the older patients, but the differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, there were no differences among the two populations in terms of functional outcomes (daytime and nighttime continence, potency), or in either cancer-specific or overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS: RARC with totally intracorporeal ONB diversion can be offered to older patients with an expectation of good surgical, functional and early survival outcomes, although further studies with a larger sample size will be needed to confirm these results.
AIM: To compare surgical, functional and early survival outcomes for robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction in patients age = 75 y to those in patients age < 75 y using Propensity Score Matching. METHODS: We collected data from 15 patients age = 75 y from among 60 consecutive RARC with ONB reconstruction performed at our institution from January 2015 to July 2018. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon after modular training under the supervision of a skilled surgeon. Demographic, surgical, functional and survival data were prospectively collected and compared to the corresponding data from 15 patients from the same series age < 75 y, matched according to the ASA score, body mass index, clinical stage and associated carcinoma in situ using Propensity Score Matching. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to preoperative parameters, such as ASA score, BMI and preoperative stage. The same homogeneity was found for intraoperative parameters, such as operation time, number of nodes retrieved and ONB time. The only statistically significant difference noted was in the percentage of nerve-sparing procedures, which was higher in the younger patient group (p < 0.001). The percentages of early and late postoperative complications were higher in the older patients, but the differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, there were no differences among the two populations in terms of functional outcomes (daytime and nighttime continence, potency), or in either cancer-specific or overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS: RARC with totally intracorporeal ONB diversion can be offered to older patients with an expectation of good surgical, functional and early survival outcomes, although further studies with a larger sample size will be needed to confirm these results.
Authors: Angelo Porreca; Katie Palmer; Walter Artibani; Alessandro Antonelli; Lorenzo Bianchi; Eugenio Brunocilla; Aldo Massimo Bocciardi; Maurizio Brausi; Gian Maria Busetto; Marco Carini; Giuseppe Carrieri; Antonio Celia; Luca Cindolo; Giovanni Cochetti; Renzo Colombo; Ettore De Berardinis; Ottavio De Cobelli; Fabrizio Di Maida; Amelio Ercolino; Franco Gaboardi; Antonio Galfano; Andrea Gallina; Michele Gallucci; Carlo Introini; Ettore Mearini; Andrea Minervini; Francesco Montorsi; Gennaro Musi; Giovannalberto Pini; Riccardo Schiavina; Silvia Secco; Sergio Serni; Claudio Simeone; Giovanni Tasso; Daniele D'Agostino Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Angelo Porreca; Luca Di Gianfrancesco; Walter Artibani; Gian Maria Busetto; Giuseppe Carrieri; Alessandro Antonelli; Lorenzo Bianchi; Eugenio Brunocilla; Aldo Massimo Bocciardi; Marco Carini; Antonio Celia; Giovanni Cochetti; Andrea Gallina; Ettore Mearini; Andrea Minervini; Riccardo Schiavina; Sergio Serni; Daniele D'Agostino; Erica Debbi; Paolo Corsi; Alessandro Crestani Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2022-05-04