Literature DB >> 31036546

Effect of Flash Glucose Monitoring Technology on Glycemic Control and Treatment Satisfaction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Marianna Yaron1,2, Eytan Roitman1, Genya Aharon-Hananel1, Zohar Landau1,2,3, Tali Ganz3, Ilan Yanuv4, Aliza Rozenberg4, Moshe Karp1, Maya Ish-Shalom1,2, Joelle Singer1,2, Julio Wainstein1,2,3, Itamar Raz5,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess treatment satisfaction and the effectiveness of a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system in patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 101 patients with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) for at least 1 year were assigned randomly to the FGM intervention (n = 53) or the standard care (control) group (n = 48) and followed for 10 weeks. Both groups were instructed to adjust their insulin doses in face-to-face and telephone visits. Satisfaction with treatment, quality of life, comfort using FGM, HbA1c, and frequency of hypoglycemic events were evaluated.
RESULTS: The intervention group found treatment significantly more flexible (P = 0.019) and would recommend it to their counterparts (P = 0.023). Satisfaction using the FGM system was high. The changes in HbA1c were -0.82% (9 mmol/mol) vs. -0.33% (3.6 mmol/mol) in the intervention and control group, respectively (P = 0.005); in nonprespecified post hoc analysis, 68.6% of the patients in the intervention group had their HbA1c reduced by ≥0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) compared with 30.2% in the control group (P < 0.001), and 39.2% had their HbA1c reduced by ≥1.0% (10.9 mmol/mol) vs. 18.6% in the control group (P = 0.0023) without an increased frequency of hypoglycemia.
CONCLUSIONS: FGM tends to improve treatment satisfaction and may lead to amelioration of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes on MDI without increasing the frequency of hypoglycemia.
© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31036546     DOI: 10.2337/dc18-0166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  31 in total

1.  Alternative methods for assessing glycemia might prove useful in cases of discordance between glycated hemoglobin and self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  Theocharis Koufakis; Kalliopi Kotsa
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 2.  Diabetes in ageing: pathways for developing the evidence base for clinical guidance.

Authors:  Medha N Munshi; Graydon S Meneilly; Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas; Kelly L Close; Paul R Conlin; Tali Cukierman-Yaffe; Angus Forbes; Om P Ganda; C Ronald Kahn; Elbert Huang; Lori M Laffel; Christine G Lee; Sei Lee; David M Nathan; Naushira Pandya; Richard Pratley; Robert Gabbay; Alan J Sinclair
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 32.069

3.  Hemoglobin A1c modifies the association between triglyceride and time in hypoglycemia determined by flash glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: implications for individualized therapy and decision-making.

Authors:  Yiwen Liu; Jie Yu; Chifa Ma; Shuli He; Fan Ping; Huabing Zhang; Wei Li; Lingling Xu; Xinhua Xiao; Yuxiu Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

4.  Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Summary Review of Recent Real-World Evidence.

Authors:  Clifford J Bailey; James R Gavin
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2021-01

5.  Effect of flash glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: a nationwide, longitudinal observational study of 14,372 flash users compared with 7691 glucose sensor naive controls.

Authors:  David Nathanson; Ann-Marie Svensson; Mervete Miftaraj; Stefan Franzén; Jan Bolinder; Katarina Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Important Drop in Rate of Acute Diabetes Complications in People With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes After Initiation of Flash Glucose Monitoring in France: The RELIEF Study.

Authors:  Ronan Roussel; Jean-Pierre Riveline; Eric Vicaut; Gérard de Pouvourville; Bruno Detournay; Corinne Emery; Fleur Levrat-Guillen; Bruno Guerci
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 17.152

7.  Feasibility of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Telemetry System in an Inpatient Diabetes Unit: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Clémentine Dillmann; Lamia Amoura; Fatéma Fall Mostaine; Adrien Coste; Leila Bounyar; Laurence Kessler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-04

8.  Use of Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring Is Associated With A1C Reduction in People With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin or Noninsulin Therapy.

Authors:  Eugene E Wright; Matthew S D Kerr; Ignacio J Reyes; Yelena Nabutovsky; Eden Miller
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2021-02-10

9.  Diabetes and technology: A pilot study on the management of patients with insulin pumps during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Fabio Petrelli; Giovanni Cangelosi; Stefania Scuri; Paola Pantanetti; Francesca Lavorgna; Federica Faldetta; Cristina De Carolis; Renato Rocchi; Giulia Debernardi; Alexandra Florescu; Giulio Nittari; Getu Gamo Sagaro; Giulia Garda; Cuc Thi Thu Nguyen; Iolanda Grappasonni
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 5.602

10.  The Accuracy and Precision of the Continuously Stored Data from Flash Glucose Monitoring System in Type 2 Diabetes Patients during Standard Meal Tolerance Test.

Authors:  Rengna Yan; Huiqin Li; Xiaocen Kong; Xiaofang Zhai; Maoyuan Chen; Yixuan Sun; Lei Ye; Xiaofei Su; Jianhua Ma
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 3.257

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.