| Literature DB >> 31035620 |
Yang Li1, Yaochen Qin2,3.
Abstract
The regions in China that intersect the 400 mm annual precipitation line are especially ecologically sensitive and extremely vulnerable to anthropogenic activities. However, in the context of climate change, the response of vegetation Net Primary Production (NPP) in this region has not been scientifically studied in depth. NPP suffers from the comprehensive effect of multiple climatic factors, and how to eliminate the effect of interfering variables in the correlation analysis of NPP and target variables (temperature or precipitation) is the major challenge in the study of NPP influencing factors. The correlation coefficient between NPP and target variable was calculated by ignoring other variables that also had a large impact on NPP. This increased the uncertainty of research results. Therefore, in this study, the second-order partial correlation analysis method was used to analyze the correlation between NPP and target variables by controlling other variables. This can effectively decrease the uncertainty of analysis results. In this paper, the univariate linear regression, coefficient of variation, and Hurst index estimation were used to study the spatial and temporal variations in NPP and analyze whether the NPP seasonal and annual variability will persist into the future. The results show the following: (i) The spatial distribution of NPP correlated with precipitation and had a gradually decreasing trend from southeast to northwest. From 2000 to 2015, the NPP in the study area had a general upward trend, with a small variation in its range. (ii) Areas with negative partial correlation coefficients between NPP and precipitation are consistent with the areas with more abundant water resources. The partial correlation coefficient between the NPP and the Land Surface Temperature (LST) was positive for 52.64% of the total study area. Finally, the prediction of the persistence of NPP variation into the future showed significant differences on varying time scales. On an annual scale, NPP was predicted to persist for 46% of the study area. On a seasonal scale, NPP in autumn was predicted to account for 49.92%, followed by spring (25.67%), summer (13.40%), and winter (6.75%).Entities:
Keywords: 400 mm annual precipitation; Hurst index; climate change; net primary production; second-order partial correlation; spatial and temporal variation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31035620 PMCID: PMC6539075 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16091497
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Geographical location of the study area.
Figure 2Scatterplot of mean value (a) and maximum value (b) of NPP in county administrative units.
Figure 3Local spatial agglomeration (a,b) and significance (c,d) of average and Max NPP values.
Figure 4Mean annual NPP from 2000 to 2015 (a) and the spatial pattern of conversion of land use types from 2000 to 2015 (b).
Land use transfer matrix from 2000 to 2015 (km2).
| Land Use Type | Farmland | Forest | Grassland | Water | Desert | Built-Up Area | Bare Land |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmland | 659,998 | 2360 | 4346 | 1405 | 8956 | 124 | 294 |
| Forest | 764 | 46,2587 | 890 | 167 | 468 | 27 | 46 |
| Grassland | 4994 | 2966 | 1,793,473 | 1758 | 2648 | 3418 | 322 |
| Water | 1803 | 138 | 899 | 16,4937 | 466 | 1036 | 244 |
| Desert | 181 | 27 | 57 | 82 | 69,398 | 14 | 1 |
| Built-up area | 747 | 302 | 2856 | 1513 | 744 | 250,059 | 155 |
| Bare land | 18 | 7 | 101 | 73 | 15 | 11 | 265,807 |
Figure 5The NPP variation trends (a), F significance test (b), CV of NPP (c), and relative annual rate of change in NPP (d).
Figure 6Spatial distribution and the T significance test of partial correlations coefficient between annual NPP and precipitation (a,b) and NPP and Land surface temperature (c,d) between 2000 and 2015.
The statistical results of the second-order partial correlation between NPP, precipitation, and LST.
| Province | NPP and Precipitation (R) | NPP and Precipitation (Area, 104km2) | NPP and LST (R) | NPP and LST (Area, 104km2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max | Min | Mean | Positive | Negative | Max | Min | Mean | Positive | Negative | |
| Heilongjiang | 0.67 | −0.84 | −0.19 | 0.32 | 0.69 | 0.90 | −0.57 | 0.23 | 0.84 | 0.17 |
| Jilin | 0.96 | −0.96 | −0.15 | 20.18 | 52.09 | 0.97 | −0.94 | 0.01 | 38.51 | 33.74 |
| Liaoning | 0.66 | −0.87 | −0.33 | 0.37 | 5.37 | 0.91 | −0.70 | 0.19 | 4.58 | 1.16 |
| Hebei | 0.74 | −0.88 | −0.12 | 5.04 | 11.29 | 0.87 | −0.90 | 0.00 | 8.38 | 7.95 |
| Beijing | 0.83 | −0.81 | 0.00 | 6.77 | 7.44 | 0.89 | −0.86 | −0.09 | 5.07 | 9.14 |
| Tianjin | 0.81 | −0.88 | −0.11 | 2.71 | 6.88 | 0.86 | −0.77 | 0.15 | 6.96 | 2.61 |
| Shandong | 0.94 | −0.94 | −0.20 | 12.31 | 36.04 | 0.91 | −0.89 | 0.12 | 33.27 | 15.08 |
| Henan | 0.82 | −0.82 | 0.09 | 2.76 | 1.25 | 0.87 | −0.79 | 0.08 | 2.47 | 1.54 |
| Shanxi | 0.90 | −0.95 | 0.02 | 34.07 | 31.74 | 0.92 | −0.94 | −0.11 | 21.27 | 44.50 |
| Shaanxi | 0.89 | −0.77 | −0.27 | 0.35 | 5.93 | 0.89 | −0.83 | 0.11 | 4.40 | 1.87 |
| Inner Mongolia | 0.90 | −0.60 | 0.34 | 7.13 | 0.56 | 0.86 | −0.79 | −0.03 | 3.23 | 4.47 |
| Ningxia | 0.91 | −0.89 | 0.26 | 8.87 | 2.25 | 0.84 | −0.86 | −0.19 | 1.84 | 9.28 |
| Gansu | 0.77 | −0.84 | −0.09 | 2.69 | 6.22 | 0.87 | −0.78 | 0.13 | 6.12 | 2.78 |
| Xinjiang | 0.73 | −0.48 | 0.13 | 0.82 | 0.20 | 0.83 | −0.59 | 0.24 | 0.90 | 0.13 |
| Sichuan | 0.81 | −0.60 | 0.12 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.80 | −0.65 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.09 |
| Qinghai | 0.80 | −0.76 | 0.03 | 8.91 | 6.96 | 0.93 | −0.85 | 0.17 | 11.61 | 4.27 |
| Tibet | 0.87 | −0.91 | −0.18 | 4.46 | 14.09 | 0.90 | −0.89 | 0.00 | 8.70 | 9.85 |
Figure 7Future trend analysis of net primary productivity in the study area.