| Literature DB >> 31035528 |
Yuanzheng Cui1, Lei Jiang2, Weishi Zhang3,4, Haijun Bao5, Bin Geng6, Qingqing He7, Long Zhang8, David G Streets9.
Abstract
China's rapid urbanization and industrialization have affected the spatiotemporal patterns of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) pollution, which has led to greater environmental pressures. In order to mitigate the environmental pressures caused by NO2 pollution, it is of vital importance to investigate the influencing factors. We first obtained data for NO2 pollution at the city level using satellite observation techniques and analyzed its spatial distribution. Next, we introduced a theoretical framework, an extended stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence, and technology (STIRPAT) model, to quantify the relationship between NO2 pollution and its contributing natural and socio-economic factors. The results are as follows. Cities with high NO2 pollution are mainly concentrated in the North China Plain. On the contrary, southwestern cities are characterized by low NO2 pollution. In addition, we find that population, per capita gross domestic product, the share of the secondary industry, ambient air pressures, total nighttime light data, and urban road area have a positive impact on NO2 pollution. In contrast, increases in the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), relative humidity, temperature, and wind speed may reduce NO2 pollution. These empirical results should help the government to effectively and efficiently implement further emission reductions and energy saving policies in Chinese cities in a bid to mitigate the environmental pressures.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese cities; extended STIRPAT model; nitrogen dioxide pollution; satellite observations; urban environmental pressures
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31035528 PMCID: PMC6539091 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16091487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Descriptive statistics for variables.
| Variable | Definitions | Unit | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Tropospheric NO2 VCDs | 1015 molecules cm−2 | 6.76 | 5.54 | 0.80 | 27.86 |
|
| Population per km2 | Capita/sq.m | 438.12 | 323.27 | 15.89 | 2590.95 |
|
| Per capita gross domestic product | Yuan/Capita | 25611.11 | 20089.61 | 1652.48 | 151645.00 |
|
| Ratio of secondary industry to tertiary industry | % | 1.58 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 9.05 |
|
| Urban road area | 10,000 km2 | 1376.74 | 1752.99 | 14.84 | 13322 |
|
| Nighttime light values | DN | 9338853 | 7473880 | 499456 | 48631951 |
|
| Normalized difference vegetation index | Unitless | 0.57 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.78 |
|
| Ambient air pressure near ground | hPa | 969.96 | 54.60 | 751.03 | 1016.86 |
|
| Relative humidity | % | 68 | 8 | 42 | 84 |
|
| Temperature | ︒C | 14.31 | 5.00 | 0.43 | 23.72 |
|
| Wind speed | m/s | 2.12 | 0.52 | 1.09 | 4.80 |
Figure 1Spatial distribution of annual mean tropospheric NO2 over China in 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2012.
Figure 2Global Moran’s I values at the city level from 2005 to 2012.
Figure 3Hot-spot analysis over China in 2012.
Pearson correlation coefficients.
| Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | ||||||||||
|
| 0.6828 | 1 | |||||||||
|
| 0.4523 | 0.1900 | 1 | ||||||||
|
| 0.2308 | 0.0432 | 0.3087 | 1 | |||||||
|
| 0.5474 | 0.5055 | 0.5900 | −0.0776 | 1 | ||||||
|
| 0.5271 | 0.2748 | 0.4453 | −0.0344 | 0.6473 | 1 | |||||
|
| −0.0231 | 0.3119 | −0.2944 | −0.2389 | −0.0732 | −0.0702 | 1 | ||||
|
| −0.0417 | 0.4341 | -0.0841 | −0.1443 | 0.0449 | −0.1092 | 0.7222 | 1 | |||
|
| −0.1070 | 0.4213 | −0.1720 | −0.1487 | −0.0002 | −0.2034 | 0.7325 | 0.8837 | 1 | ||
|
| 0.1649 | 0.5543 | −0.0529 | 0.0818 | 0.0558 | −0.1430 | 0.3881 | 0.6836 | 0.5866 | 1 | |
|
| 0.2446 | 0.0355 | 0.3530 | 0.0063 | 0.2890 | 0.4073 | −0.3701 | −0.2689 | −0.3503 | −0.3162 | 1 |
Note: p-values in brackets.
Pooled least squares results.
| Variable | Coefficient | Std. Err | Probability | VIF | Tolerance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.7449 | 0.0176 | 0.0000 | 2.54 | 0.3946 |
|
| 0.2400 | 0.0195 | 0.0000 | 2.23 | 0.4476 |
|
| 0.1976 | 0.0248 | 0.0000 | 1.43 | 0.7014 |
|
| −0.0442 | 0.0167 | 0.0080 | 3.19 | 0.3130 |
|
| 0.2004 | 0.0174 | 0.0000 | 2.18 | 0.4589 |
|
| 0.5498 | 0.0538 | 0.0000 | 3.08 | 0.3250 |
|
| −0.2134 | 0.0410 | 0.0000 | 7.21 | 0.1386 |
|
| −2.1780 | 0.1679 | 0.0000 | 5.80 | 0.1725 |
|
| 0.0172 | 0.0332 | 0.6050 | 2.97 | 0.3366 |
|
| −0.0273 | 0.0477 | 0.5670 | 1.60 | 0.6252 |
|
| −8.4091 | 0.2605 | 0.0000 | ||
|
| 0.7514 | ||||
|
| 0.7501 | ||||
|
| 584.35 | ||||
|
| 0.0000 |
Results of the fixed effects and random effects models.
| Fixed Effects Model | Random Effects Model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Coefficient | Std. Err | Probability | Coefficient | Std. Err | Probability |
|
| 0.3874 | 0.1032 | 0.0000 | 0.6855 | 0.0346 | 0.0000 |
|
| 0.3783 | 0.0163 | 0.0000 | 0.3456 | 0.0151 | 0.0000 |
|
| 0.1055 | 0.0377 | 0.0050 | 0.1386 | 0.0325 | 0.0000 |
|
| 0.0267 | 0.0135 | 0.0480 | 0.0158 | 0.0131 | 0.2280 |
|
| 0.0897 | 0.0233 | 0.0000 | 0.1245 | 0.0202 | 0.0000 |
|
| −0.2064 | 0.0818 | 0.0120 | −0.1316 | 0.0648 | 0.0420 |
|
| 0.0439 | 0.0239 | 0.0660 | 0.0240 | 0.0231 | 0.2980 |
|
| −0.6783 | 0.1272 | 0.0000 | −0.9016 | 0.1222 | 0.0000 |
|
| −0.1592 | 0.0499 | 0.0010 | −0.2156 | 0.0399 | 0.0000 |
|
| −0.4169 | 0.0667 | 0.0000 | −0.3399 | 0.0581 | 0.0000 |
|
| −5.7434 | 0.6871 | 0.0000 | −7.5706 | 0.3597 | 0.0000 |
|
| 0.5712 | 0.5655 | ||||
|
| 225.24 | 2805.35 | ||||
|
| 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||||