| Literature DB >> 31035426 |
Jinyang Huo1, Zhenjun Wang2,3, Huaxin Chen4,5, Rui He6,7.
Abstract
Low atmospheric pressure (LAP) can enormously affect properties of cement concrete in plateau areas. There are fewer studies and attendances on this issue than those of cement concrete in normal atmospheric pressure (AP), because of the limitations of both environmental conditions and instruments. In order to improve properties of cement concrete under LAP, influences of LAP on properties of cement concrete were reviewed in this work. The influence rules and mechanism on properties of cement concrete were summarized. The corresponding mechanism and techniques were put forward for enhancing the properties of cement concrete. The results of researchers show that LAP can significantly reduce the air entraining ability of the air entraining agent (AEA). Air content in concrete linearly decreases with the decrease of AP when other conditions are constant. If the initial air content is high, the decrease rate of air content increases with the decrease of AP. When the initial air content in cement concretes is similar, the greater the slump of cement concrete, the stronger its resistance to the decrease of air content caused by the decrease of AP. In addition, the condition of the bubble characteristics of hardened cement concrete under LAP is worse than that under normal AP. Therefore, the change of concrete properties under LAP is mainly attributed to these bubble characteristics, such as air content, bubble spacing coefficient, bubble radius and bubble specific surface area. In this work, nano-silica (negative charges) with cationic oligomeric surfactants is recommended as a new type of AEA to optimize the bubble characteristics under LAP in plateau areas.Entities:
Keywords: air entraining agent (AEA); bubble characteristics; improvement techniques; low atmospheric pressure (LAP); plateau areas; properties of cement concrete
Year: 2019 PMID: 31035426 PMCID: PMC6539586 DOI: 10.3390/ma12091384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Foaming results in Beijing and Golmud of China.
| Areas | Air Entraining Agent Quantity (g) | Maximum Bubble Volume (mL) | Foam Duration (h) | Bubble Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | 0.2 | 11 | 27 | Small particle size, large quantity |
| Golmud | 0.2 | 10 | 15.2 | Large particle size, small quantity |
Note: 1. The solution concentration is the air entraining agent, in which the above weight is dissolved in 100 mL of water, respectively. 2. The duration of the foam is the time from the end of the shaking to the disappearance of the foam to expose the horizontal liquid level.
Figure 1Schematic diagram of bubble amalgamation.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of bubble crack.
Foaming ability of air entraining agent (AEA) under different atmospheric pressures (AP).
| Sample | AP (kPa) | Surface Tension | Foaming Ability | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Value | Growth Rate (%) | Foaming Capacity (mL) | Foaming Capacity at 3 min (mL) | Foam Stability (%) | Defoaming Time (h) | Bubble Shape | ||
| AEA-A | 101.1 | 29.4 | 100 | Full | Full | 100 | ≥72 h | Small |
| 65.9 | 32.9 | 112 | Full | Full | 100 | ≥48 h | Much big | |
| 57.2 | 34.6 | 118 | 50 | 49 | 98 | ≥48 h | Little, sparse | |
| AEA-B | 101.1 | 31.9 | 100 | 38 | 36 | 95 | ≥36 h | Moderate |
| 65.9 | 34.2 | 107 | 32 | 30 | 94 | ≥24 h | Much big | |
| 57.2 | 36.3 | 114 | 29 | 26 | 90 | ≥24 h | Little, sparse | |
Note: AEA-A, synthetic anionic surfactant air entraining agent; AEA-B, alkyl sulfonate air entraining agent; Full, bubbles fill measuring cylinder.
Figure 3Surface tension histogram of air entraining agent (AEA) under different atmospheric pressure (AP).
Figure 4The relationship between dosage of AEA and air content under different AP.
Relative air content of concrete after normalized treatment.
| AEA | Initial Air Content (%) | AP (kPa) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | 60 | 50 | ||||||||
| 1# | 2# | 3# | 1# | 2# | 3# | 1# | 2# | 3# | ||
| Saponins | 3 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| 5 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.62 | |
| 7 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.53 | |
| JDU | 3 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.73 |
| 5 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.55 | |
| 7 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.51 | |
| Rosin | 3 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.73 |
| 5 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.62 | |
| 7 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.55 | |
| Polyether | 3 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.80 |
| 5 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.61 | |
| 7 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.61 | |
The decrease of air content under low atmospheric pressure (LAP) (%).
| Initial Air Content (%) | Air Entraining Agent Type | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saponins | JDU | Rosin | Polyether | |
| 3 | 6-5 | 12-31 | 9-35 | 10-20 |
| 5 | 13-39 | 13-45 | 18-38 | 18-39 |
| 7 | 14-47 | 17-49 | 21-45 | 23-39 |
Note: The reduced value in the table corresponds to the low atmospheric pressure (LAP) range of 50–80 kPa. The lower the AP, the more the reduced value.
Influence of low atmospheric pressure (LAP) on AEA effect in concrete.
| Researchers | Test | Results | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zhu, et al. [ | Foaming test | The AP affects the air entraining ability of AEA, which ultimately leads to a decrease in the air content of concrete under LAP. | From different researchers and tests, we know that the LAP significantly reduces the foaming capacity and foam stability of AEA. It can affect the air content of concrete, which is not conducive to the properties of concrete. |
| Yan, et al. [ | AEA quality test | ||
| Li, et al. [ | Simulation test of LAP | LAP can significantly reduce the air entraining ability of AEA. No matter what kind of AEA is added, the air content of concrete decreases with the decrease of AP. When other conditions are constant, the air content of concrete decreases linearly with the decrease of AP. When initial air content of concretes is high, the reduction rate of air content increases with the decrease of AP. When the initial air content of concretes is similar, the greater the slump of concrete, the stronger its resistance to the decrease of air content caused by the decrease of AP. | |
| Ke, et al. [ | Pumpability test |
Figure 5The growth and departure behavior of an isolated bubble under LAP.
Bubble characteristics of hardened concrete under different AP (equivalent dosage of air entraining agent).
| AEA | Rosin | JDU | Saponins | Polyether | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAP | AP | LAP | AP | LAP | AP | LAP | AP | |
| Air content of hardened concrete (%) | 2.5 | 4.6 | 2.54 | 4.87 | 3.03 | 4.92 | 2.95 | 4.92 |
| Bubble spacing coefficient (μm) | 337 | 207 | 358 | 175 | 313 | 184 | 316 | 178 |
| Specific surface area of stomata (mm−1) | 20.44 | 25.87 | 19.47 | 29.79 | 20.62 | 31.21 | 20.64 | 29.01 |
| Average bubble diameter (μm) | 196 | 155 | 205 | 134 | 194 | 128 | 194 | 138 |
| Number of bubbles per unit volume | 308 | 718 | 298 | 875 | 377 | 927 | 367 | 862 |
Bubble characteristics of hardened concrete under different AP (similar air content).
| AEA | Rosin | JDU | Saponins | Polyether | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAP | AP | LAP | AP | LAP | AP | LAP | AP | |
| Air content of hardened concrete (%) | 3.86 | 3.62 | 4.47 | 4.46 | 3.87 | 3.9 | 3.81 | 3.72 |
| Bubble spacing coefficient (μm) | 266 | 177 | 212 | 119 | 203 | 157 | 319 | 178 |
| Specific surface area of stomata (mm−1) | 21.8 | 25.96 | 25.59 | 39.66 | 28.25 | 36.55 | 18.26 | 32.95 |
| Average bubble diameter (μm) | 184 | 171 | 156 | 138 | 142 | 109 | 219 | 121 |
| Number of bubbles per unit volume | 508 | 823 | 691 | 929 | 660 | 861 | 420 | 740 |
Effect of different humidity (H) on the pore structure of concrete under different pressure.
| Curing Ages | Curing Condition | Porosity (%) | Total Mercury Intake (mL/g) | Average Pore Size (nm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3d | P50H30 | P50H60 | 14.86 | 13.87 | 0.0838 | 0.0748 | 53.3 | 38.5 |
| 7d | P50H30 | P50H60 | 14.07 | 13.03 | 0.0805 | 0.0733 | 38.7 | 34.1 |
| 28d | P100H98 | 12.79 | 12.79 | 0.0689 | 0.0689 | 20.5 | 20.5 | |
Note: The subscript of the P is the AP value; The subscript of the H is the humidity.
Figure 6Schematic diagram of pore change.
Influence of normal AP / LAP on the mechanical properties of concrete.
| Researchers | Mechanical Properties | Results | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ma [ | Compressive strength | During the curing process, when humidity is constant, the compressive strength of concrete decreases with the decrease of AP. | From different researchers and tests, we know that the LAP affects the mechanical properties of concrete by the bubble characteristics (especially air content). |
| Flexural strength | During the curing process, when the humidity is constant, the flexural strength of concrete decreases with the decrease of AP. | ||
| Liu [ | Compressive strength | Under normal AP, the compressive strength of concrete is related to the air content and pore structure. When the average pore size is small, the reduction rate of compressive strength is also small. On the contrary, the average pore size increases under LAP, which increases the reduction rate of compressive strength. | |
| Flexural strength | Under AP, bubbles can reduce the internal microcracks formed by concrete during hardening. Flexural strength is more sensitive to these micro cracks than compressive strength. On the contrary, under LAP, the air content decreases. There are not enough bubbles to inhibit microcracks. Therefore, LAP greatly affects the flexural strength. | ||
| Zhou, et al. [ | Compressive strength | Under AP, when air content of concrete was less than 5%, the correlation between compressive strength and air content varied greatly at 3d and 7d curing ages. Therefore, under LAP, the air content decreases, which greatly affects compressive strength of concrete. |
Frost resistance of concrete formed under different AP.
| AP | AEA Dosage (%) | Air Content (%) | Frost Resistance at 28-Day Curing Ages | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative Dynamic Elasticity Modulus (%) | Loss of Mass (%) | |||||||
| P50 | P100 | P150 | W50 | W100 | W150 | |||
| Tibet, 65.9 | 0.04 | 3.6 | 90 | 86 | 78 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 2.7 |
| Hubei, 101.1 | 0.04 | 5.1 | 93 | 90 | 84 | 0 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
Influence of normal AP / LAP on the durability of concrete.
| Researchers | Durability | Results | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li, et al. [ | Frost resistance | When the AP decreases to 50 kPa, the air content of concrete decreases about 20%–49% in comparison to that in normal AP. It directly affects the frost resistance of the concrete. | From different researchers and tests, we know that the LAP affects the durability of concrete by the bubble characteristics (especially air content). |
| Yan, et al. [ | Frost resistance | After 150 freeze-thaw cycles, the concrete specimens in the Hubei area have higher relative elastic modulus and smaller mass loss. Its frost resistance is better than that of Tibet. | |
| Liu [ | Frost resistance | Under normal AP, proper air content can improve the frost resistance of concrete. However, LAP can significantly reduce air content, which greatly affects the frost resistance. | |
| Ma [ | Impermeability | The impermeability of concrete decreases with the decrease of AP when the humidity is constant during the curing ages. | |
| Liu [ | Impermeability | Under normal AP, proper air content can improve the impermeability of concrete. However, LAP can significantly reduce air content, which greatly affects the impermeability. |
Figure 7Void images of hardened cement mortar: (a) no AEA, (b) with AEA.
Figure 8Chemical structures of the cationic oligomeric surfactants (compounds 2–4) and the corresponding monomeric analog (compound 1).