Literature DB >> 31035264

The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission radiation protection policy and opportunities for the future.

Cynthia G Jones1.   

Abstract

For nearly 50 years, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has been responsible for the development of radiation protection regulations and guidance for protecting workers, the public and the environment. In 1971, although ALARA was not a regulatory requirement, NRC's predecessor, the Atomic Energy Commission, incorporated the concept of 'as low as is practically achievable' into its general provisions for standards against radiation, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 20. In 1975, the NRC codified the phrase 'as low as is reasonably achievable' (ALARA) and the definition of ALARA was broadly consistent with today's definition. Implicit in the ALARA concept is the linear no-threshold (LNT) dose-response relationship. The NRC acknowledges that a bifurcation between the public's concern with radiation exposure and the perspectives of many in the scientific community to eliminate LNT-based regulations exists. NRC understands that the LNT basis for ALARA (i.e. that the stochastic effects of radiation do not have a low dose threshold) is not accepted by all individuals, but the LNT theory continues to serve as the basis of its regulatory approach, which is derived directly from the recommendations of national and international expert bodies. Over the years, NRC and other Federal agencies have been petitioned to revise the basis for their radiation protection policy. This article presents an overview of what NRC has done and explores opportunities for maintaining the right balance between the potential risks and benefits of radiation in establishing radiation protection policy.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31035264     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab1d75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  2 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of radiation protection for medical workers.

Authors:  John Boice; Lawrence T Dauer; Kenneth R Kase; Fred A Mettler; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Assessment of an Emergency Medicine System for Radiation Accidents in Korea: A State Survey of the Workers Involved the Medical Response to Radiation Accidents.

Authors:  You Yeon Choi; Mihyun Yang; Younghyun Lee; Eunil Lee; Young Woo Jin; Ki Moon Seong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.