Literature DB >> 31035070

Biomechanical performance of cranial implants with different thicknesses and material properties: A finite element study.

Petr Marcián1, Nathaniel Narra2, Libor Borák3, Jakub Chamrad3, Jan Wolff4.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of implant thickness and material on deformation and stress distribution within different components of cranial implant assemblies. Using the finite element method, two cranial implants, differing in size and shape, and thicknesses (1, 2, 3 and 4 mm, respectively), were simulated under three loading scenarios. The implant assembly model included the detailed geometries of the mini-plates and micro-screws and was simulated using a sub-modeling approach. Statistical assessments based on the Design of Experiment methodology and on multiple regression analysis revealed that peak stresses in the components are influenced primarily by implant thickness, while the effect of implant material is secondary. On the contrary, the implant deflection is influenced predominantly by implant material followed by implant thickness. The highest values of deformation under a 50 N load were observed in the thinnest (1 mm) Polymethyl Methacrylate implant (Small defect: 0.296 mm; Large defect: 0.390 mm). The thinnest Polymethyl Methacrylate and Polyether Ether Ketone implants also generated stresses in the implants that can potentially breach the materials' yield limit. In terms of stress distribution, the change of implant thickness had a more significant impact on the implant performance than the change of Young's modulus of the implant material. The results indicated that the stresses are concentrated in the locations of fixation; therefore, the detailed models of mini-plates and micro-screws implemented in the finite element simulation provided a better insight into the mechanical performance of the implant-skull system.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Cranioplasty; Finite element method; Mechanical properties; Skull implant

Year:  2019        PMID: 31035070     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  5 in total

Review 1.  Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.

Authors:  Kacper Kroczek; Paweł Turek; Damian Mazur; Jacek Szczygielski; Damian Filip; Robert Brodowski; Krzysztof Balawender; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Bogumił Lewandowski; Stanisław Orkisz; Artur Mazur; Grzegorz Budzik; Józef Cebulski; Mariusz Oleksy
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.967

2.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Cranial Implants for Virtual Surgical Planning: An In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  Bilal Msallem; Michaela Maintz; Florian S Halbeisen; Simon Meyer; Guido R Sigron; Neha Sharma; Shuaishuai Cao; Florian M Thieringer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Beneficial osseointegration effect of hydroxyapatite coating on cranial implant - FEM investigation.

Authors:  Jakub Chamrad; Petr Marcián; Jan Cizek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Thickness accuracy of virtually designed patient-specific implants for large neurocranial defects.

Authors:  Claudia Wittner; Markus Borowski; Lukas Pirl; Johann Kastner; Andreas Schrempf; Ute Schäfer; Klemens Trieb; Sascha Senck
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Adaptive Mechanism for Designing a Personalized Cranial Implant and Its 3D Printing Using PEEK.

Authors:  Syed Hammad Mian; Khaja Moiduddin; Sherif Mohammed Elseufy; Hisham Alkhalefah
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.329

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.