Literature DB >> 31035069

Computer aided diagnosis for suspect keratoconus detection.

Ikram Issarti1, Alejandra Consejo2, Marta Jiménez-García3, Sarah Hershko3, Carina Koppen3, Jos J Rozema3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a stable and low-cost computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system for early keratoconus detection for clinical use.
METHODS: The CAD combines a custom-made mathematical model, a feedforward neural network (FFN) and a Grossberg-Runge Kutta architecture to detect clinical and suspect keratoconus. It was applied to retrospective data of 851 subjects for whom corneal elevation and thickness data was available. These data were divided into four groups: a control group (312 eyes) with bilateral normal tomography, keratoconus suspect (77 eyes) with a clinically diagnosed keratoconus in one eye and a normal fellow eye, mild keratoconus (220 eyes), and moderate keratoconus (229 eyes). The proposed framework is validated using 10-cross-validation, holdout validation and ROC curves.
RESULTS: The CAD detects suspect keratoconus with an accuracy of 96.56% (sensitivity 97.78%, specificity 95.56%) versus an accuracy of 89.00% (sensitivity 83.00%, specificity 95.00%) for Belin/Ambrosio Deviation (BADD), and an accuracy of 79.00% (sensitivity 58.00%, specificity 99.70%) for Topographical Keratoconus Classification (TKC). For the detection of mild to moderate keratoconus CAD shows nearly similar accuracies as previously described methods, with an average accuracy of 99.50% for CAD, versus 99.46% for BADD and 96.50% for TKC. The proposed algorithm also provides a 70% reduction in computation time, while increasing stability and convergence with respect to traditional machine learning techniques.
CONCLUSION: The proposed algorithm is highly accurate and provides a stable screening platform to assist ophthalmologists with the early detection of keratoconus. This framework could potentially be set up for any Scheimpflug tomography system.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer aided diagnosis; Cornea; Keratoconus suspect; Machine learning; Mathematical modelling; Unstructured data

Year:  2019        PMID: 31035069     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  12 in total

1.  Machine learning helps improve diagnostic ability of subclinical keratoconus using Scheimpflug and OCT imaging modalities.

Authors:  Ce Shi; Mengyi Wang; Tiantian Zhu; Ying Zhang; Yufeng Ye; Jun Jiang; Sisi Chen; Fan Lu; Meixiao Shen
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-09-10

2.  Keratoconus detection using deep learning of colour-coded maps with anterior segment optical coherence tomography: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Yuji Ayatsuka; Yudai Kato; Fusako Fujimura; Masahide Takahashi; Nobuyuki Shoji; Yosai Mori; Kazunori Miyata
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Classification of Color-Coded Scheimpflug Camera Corneal Tomography Images Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Hazem Abdelmotaal; Magdi M Mostafa; Ali N R Mostafa; Abdelsalam A Mohamed; Khaled Abdelazeem
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 4.  Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Howard Maile; Ji-Peng Olivia Li; Daniel Gore; Marcello Leucci; Padraig Mulholland; Scott Hau; Anita Szabo; Ismail Moghul; Konstantinos Balaskas; Kaoru Fujinami; Pirro Hysi; Alice Davidson; Petra Liskova; Alison Hardcastle; Stephen Tuft; Nikolas Pontikos
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-12-13

5.  Dissecting the Profile of Corneal Thickness With Keratoconus Progression Based on Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Yanling Dong; Dongfang Li; Zhen Guo; Yang Liu; Ping Lin; Bin Lv; Chuanfeng Lv; Guotong Xie; Lixin Xie
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 6.  Accuracy of Machine Learning Assisted Detection of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ke Cao; Karin Verspoor; Srujana Sahebjada; Paul N Baird
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Evaluating the Performance of Various Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus.

Authors:  Ke Cao; Karin Verspoor; Srujana Sahebjada; Paul N Baird
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Keratoconus Detection Based on a Single Scheimpflug Image.

Authors:  Alejandra Consejo; Jędrzej Solarski; Karol Karnowski; Jos J Rozema; Maciej Wojtkowski; D Robert Iskander
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Logistic Regression Model Using Scheimpflug-Placido Cornea Topographer Parameters to Diagnose Keratoconus.

Authors:  Emre Altinkurt; Ozkan Avci; Orkun Muftuoglu; Adem Ugurlu; Zafer Cebeci; Kemal Turgay Ozbilen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Keratoconus detection of changes using deep learning of colour-coded maps.

Authors:  Xu Chen; Jiaxin Zhao; Katja C Iselin; Davide Borroni; Davide Romano; Akilesh Gokul; Charles N J McGhee; Yitian Zhao; Mohammad-Reza Sedaghat; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Mohammed Ziaei; Stephen Kaye; Vito Romano; Yalin Zheng
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.