Literature DB >> 31034987

Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Jie Li1, Liang Gao2, Qiubo Li3, Yuanfeng Zhang4, Qing Jiang5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) in supine versus prone position for patients with renal or upper ureteral calculi.
METHODS: A systematic search of Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed to identify all eligible studies. All included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After quality assessment and date extraction, a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULTS: A total of 15 RCTs with 1474 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Pooled data showed that PCNL in supine position could significantly reduce the operative time [weighted mean difference (WMD) -12.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) -20.49 to -3.54, p = 0.005] and rate of fever [risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.97, p = 0.03] compared to prone position. In addition, no significant differences could be found between groups in stone-free rate (p = 0.31), hospital stay (p = 0.59) and rate of overall complications (p = 0.11), mainly including urinary leakage (p = 0.83), pleural effusion (p = 0.74) and blood transfusion (p = 0.58).
CONCLUSIONS: The current study found comparable stone-free rate and significant lower rate of postoperative fever in supine PCNL compared with prone PCNL. PCNL in supine position could be a safe and efficient choice for patients with renal or upper ureteral calculi.
Copyright © 2019 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Prone; Supine

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31034987     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  6 in total

1.  Prone versus Barts “flank-free” modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a match-pair analysis

Authors:  Uygar Miçooğulları; Davut Kamacı; Mehmet Yıldızhan; Furkan Umut Kılıç; Taha Çetin; Özer Ural Çakıcı; Murat Keske; Mehmet Yiğit Yalçın; Arslan Ardıçoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.973

2.  Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Tomas Andri Axelsson; Cecilia Cracco; Mahesh Desai; Mudhar Nazar Hasan; Thomas Knoll; Emanuele Montanari; Daniel Pérez-Fentes; Michael Straub; Kay Thomas; James C Williams; Marianne Brehmer; Palle J S Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Therapeutic effects of flexible ureteroscopy alone and in combination with external physical vibration on upper urinary tract calculi: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Cheng Tan; Yongbao Jiang; Shanshan Song; Xiaoge Li; Chunliang Zhou
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 4.  Current insights on haemorrhagic complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Sujeet Poudyal
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2021-05-29

Review 5.  Complications and outcomes of tubeless versus nephrostomy tube in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Vineet Gauhar; Olivier Traxer; Esther García Rojo; Simone Scarcella; Maria Pia Pavia; Vinson Wai-Shun Chan; Eugenio Pretore; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski; Mariela Corrales; Ho Yee Tiong; Ee Jean Lim; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Chin-Tiong Heng; Jean de la Rosette; Bhaskar Kuman Somani; Daniele Castellani
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.861

6.  Effect of Two Regimens of Fluid Administration on Airway Edema in Prone-Position Surgery.

Authors:  Ravees Jan; Ayman Alahdal; Parmod Kumar Bithal
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2021-03-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.