Literature DB >> 31033821

Three-Dimensionally Printed Hyperelastic Bone Scaffolds Accelerate Bone Regeneration in Critical-Size Calvarial Bone Defects.

Yu-Hui Huang1, Adam E Jakus1, Sumanas W Jordan1, Zari Dumanian1, Kelly Parker1, Linping Zhao1, Pravin K Patel1, Ramille N Shah1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autologous bone grafts remain the gold standard for craniofacial reconstruction despite limitations of donor-site availability and morbidity. A myriad of commercial bone substitutes and allografts are available, yet no product has gained widespread use because of inferior clinical outcomes. The ideal bone substitute is both osteoconductive and osteoinductive. Craniofacial reconstruction often involves irregular three-dimensional defects, which may benefit from malleable or customizable substrates. "Hyperelastic Bone" is a three-dimensionally printed synthetic scaffold, composed of 90% by weight hydroxyapatite and 10% by weight poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid), with inherent bioactivity and porosity to allow for tissue integration. This study examines the capacity of Hyperelastic Bone for bone regeneration in a critical-size calvarial defect.
METHODS: Eight-millimeter calvarial defects in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with three-dimensionally printed Hyperelastic Bone, three-dimensionally printed Fluffy-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) without hydroxyapatite, autologous bone (positive control), or left untreated (negative control). Animals were euthanized at 8 or 12 weeks postoperatively and specimens were analyzed for new bone formation by cone beam computed tomography, micro-computed tomography, and histology.
RESULTS: The mineralized bone volume-to-total tissue volume fractions for the Hyperelastic Bone cohort at 8 and 12 weeks were 74.2 percent and 64.5 percent of positive control bone volume/total tissue, respectively (p = 0.04). Fluffy-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) demonstrated little bone formation, similar to the negative control. Histologic analysis of Hyperelastic Bone scaffolds revealed fibrous tissue at 8 weeks, and new bone formation surrounding the scaffold struts by 12 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Findings from our study suggest that Hyperelastic Bone grafts are effective for bone regeneration, with significant potential for clinical translation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31033821     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  12 in total

1.  Enhancement of critical-sized bone defect regeneration using UiO-66 nanomaterial in rabbit femurs.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelrahiem Sadek; Mahmoud Abd-Elkareem; Hani Nasser Abdelhamid; Samia Moustafa; Kamal Hussein
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Biomaterial design strategies to address obstacles in craniomaxillofacial bone repair.

Authors:  Marley J Dewey; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Protein-spatiotemporal partition releasing gradient porous scaffolds and anti-inflammatory and antioxidant regulation remodel tissue engineered anisotropic meniscus.

Authors:  Bingbing Xu; Jing Ye; Bao-Shi Fan; Xinjie Wang; Ji-Ying Zhang; Shitang Song; Yifan Song; Wen-Bo Jiang; Xing Wang; Jia-Kuo Yu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 4.  Building Organs Using Tissue-Specific Microenvironments: Perspectives from a Bioprosthetic Ovary.

Authors:  Nathaniel F C Henning; Adam E Jakus; Monica M Laronda
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 21.942

Review 5.  Clinically relevant preclinical animal models for testing novel cranio-maxillofacial bone 3D-printed biomaterials.

Authors:  Luan P Hatt; Keith Thompson; Jill A Helms; Martin J Stoddart; Angela R Armiento
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2022-02

6.  Inclusion of a 3D-printed Hyperelastic Bone mesh improves mechanical and osteogenic performance of a mineralized collagen scaffold.

Authors:  Marley J Dewey; Andrey V Nosatov; Kiran Subedi; Ramille Shah; Adam Jakus; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Irregular Bone Defect Repair Using Tissue-Engineered Periosteum in a Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Lin Zhao; Junli Zhao; Jia-Jia Yu; Cangyu Zhang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.169

8.  3D Bioprinted Bacteriostatic Hyperelastic Bone Scaffold for Damage-Specific Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Shokouhimehr; Andrea S Theus; Archana Kamalakar; Liqun Ning; Cong Cao; Martin L Tomov; Jarred M Kaiser; Steven Goudy; Nick J Willett; Ho Won Jang; Christopher N LaRock; Philip Hanna; Aron Lechtig; Mohamed Yousef; Janaina Da Silva Martins; Ara Nazarian; Mitchel B Harris; Morteza Mahmoudi; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 9.  Biomaterials for bone regeneration: an orthopedic and dentistry overview.

Authors:  J Girón; E Kerstner; T Medeiros; L Oliveira; G M Machado; C F Malfatti; P Pranke
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.590

Review 10.  3D Bioprinting at the Frontier of Regenerative Medicine, Pharmaceutical, and Food Industries.

Authors:  Qasem Ramadan; Mohammed Zourob
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.