Jamal J Derakhshan1, Michael D Farwell2. 1. Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 2. Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Determine the prevalence of benign indium-111 (In) pentetreotide uptake in the pancreatic head and determine if a semi-quantitative method can be used to differentiate physiologic from pathologic uptake. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective review of 197 somatostatin receptor scintigraphy studies performed in 136 patients, from December 2012 to November 2013 at a large academic medical center. The pancreatic head uptake was visually graded and for all positive cases, two-dimensional and three-dimensional ratios of the pancreatic head to normal liver uptake were calculated. Statistical analysis using paired and two-sample t-tests was performed. RESULTS: Nineteen of one hundred twenty-nine (14.7%) patients had benign In pentetreotide uptake in the pancreatic head. Seven of seven (100%) patients with neuroendocrine (NE) tumors had definite visual uptake. Uptake was 2.7× more likely benign than malignant. Using a three-dimensional region of interest (ROI) method, the pancreatic head-to-liver ratio was 0.91±0.38 (0.37-1.63) for benign uptake and 8.2±7.3 (1.79-23.6) for pathologic uptake (P<0.001). A threshold of 1.67 provided 100% accuracy for determining the presence or absence of a pancreatic head NE tumor. Using a two-dimensional ROI method, the uptake ratio was 0.88±0.37 (0.28-1.73) for benign and 7.5±6.2 (1.85-19.6) for pathologic uptake (P<0.001); a ratio threshold of 1.62 provided 97% accuracy. There was no difference between the uptake ratios at 4 and 24 h. CONCLUSION: In pentetreotide uptake in the pancreatic head is common and more frequently benign than malignant. Using simple ROI ratiometric methods helps to differentiate benign physiologic from malignant NE tumor uptake.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the prevalence of benign indium-111 (In) pentetreotide uptake in the pancreatic head and determine if a semi-quantitative method can be used to differentiate physiologic from pathologic uptake. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective review of 197 somatostatin receptor scintigraphy studies performed in 136 patients, from December 2012 to November 2013 at a large academic medical center. The pancreatic head uptake was visually graded and for all positive cases, two-dimensional and three-dimensional ratios of the pancreatic head to normal liver uptake were calculated. Statistical analysis using paired and two-sample t-tests was performed. RESULTS: Nineteen of one hundred twenty-nine (14.7%) patients had benign In pentetreotide uptake in the pancreatic head. Seven of seven (100%) patients with neuroendocrine (NE) tumors had definite visual uptake. Uptake was 2.7× more likely benign than malignant. Using a three-dimensional region of interest (ROI) method, the pancreatic head-to-liver ratio was 0.91±0.38 (0.37-1.63) for benign uptake and 8.2±7.3 (1.79-23.6) for pathologic uptake (P<0.001). A threshold of 1.67 provided 100% accuracy for determining the presence or absence of a pancreatic head NE tumor. Using a two-dimensional ROI method, the uptake ratio was 0.88±0.37 (0.28-1.73) for benign and 7.5±6.2 (1.85-19.6) for pathologic uptake (P<0.001); a ratio threshold of 1.62 provided 97% accuracy. There was no difference between the uptake ratios at 4 and 24 h. CONCLUSION: In pentetreotide uptake in the pancreatic head is common and more frequently benign than malignant. Using simple ROI ratiometric methods helps to differentiate benign physiologic from malignant NE tumor uptake.
Authors: Akram Al-Ibraheem; Ralph Alexander Bundschuh; Johannes Notni; Andreas Buck; Anna Winter; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Markus Schwaiger; Klemens Scheidhauer Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: I Buchmann; M Henze; S Engelbrecht; M Eisenhut; A Runz; M Schäfer; T Schilling; S Haufe; T Herrmann; U Haberkorn Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-05-23 Impact factor: 9.236