Literature DB >> 31033035

Biological width establishment around dental implants is influenced by abutment height irrespective of vertical mucosal thickness: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Sergio Spinato1, Claudio Stacchi2, Teresa Lombardi3, Fabio Bernardello4, Marcello Messina5, Davide Zaffe6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prosthetic abutment height and peri-implant mucosal thickness are considered factors that influence marginal bone remodeling during biological width establishment around dental implants. However, no clinical studies have evaluated their simultaneous effect on marginal bone loss (MBL). This study analyzes the influence of abutment height on MBL around implants surrounded by both thin and thick mucosa up to 12 months after prosthetic loading.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy platform-switched implants with internal hex were placed equicrestally in two groups of patients with different vertical mucosal thickness: thin (≤2.0 mm) and thick mucosa (>2.0 mm). After three months of submerged healing, prosthetic abutments with a height of 1 mm (short) or 3 mm (long) were randomly assigned for single crown screwed restoration in both groups. MBL was evaluated on radiographs taken at implant placement (T0 ), restoration delivery (T1 ), and after 6 months (T2 ) and 12 months (T3 ) of loading.
RESULTS: After 12 months of loading, 66 implants were functioning (two dropouts, two failures), resulting in a 97% survival rate. Compared with T0 , mean MBL at T3 ranged between 0.59 and 0.80 mm in short abutment groups and between 0.28 and 0.37 mm in long abutment groups. Differences resulted statistically significant, irrespective of vertical peri-implant mucosal thickness. The MBL pattern over time showed the greatest amount of bone resorption in the first 6 months after loading, particularly around implants with short abutments.
CONCLUSIONS: Platform-switched implants restored with short abutments present greater marginal bone loss than identical implants with long abutments, without significant peri-implant mucosal thickness effects.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abutment height; dental implants; marginal bone loss; platform switching; thick mucosa; thin mucosa

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31033035     DOI: 10.1111/clr.13450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

1.  Variations in vertical mucosal thickness at edentulous ridge according to site and gender measured by cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Motohiro Munakata; Koudai Nagata; Minoru Sanda; Ryota Kawamata; Daisuke Sato; Kikue Yamaguchi
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-05-12

2.  Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments with or without a Titanium Base: An In Vitro Study for Tapered Conical Connection Implants.

Authors:  Shota Watanabe; Tamaki Nakano; Shinji Ono; Yasufumi Yamanishi; Takashi Matsuoka; Shoichi Ishigaki
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Implant Treatment by Guided Surgery Supporting Overdentures in Edentulous Mandible Patients.

Authors:  Eugenio Velasco-Ortega; Alvaro Jiménez-Guerra; Ivan Ortiz-Garcia; Nuno Matos Garrido; Jesús Moreno-Muñoz; Enrique Núñez-Márquez; José Luis Rondón-Romero; Daniel Cabanillas-Balsera; José López-López; Loreto Monsalve-Guil
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Peri-implant marginal bone loss and systemic statin use: A retrospective cohort pilot study.

Authors:  Behzad Bahrami-Hessari; Leif Jansson
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-10-29

5.  Influence of the implant-abutment connection on the ratio between height and thickness of tissues at the buccal zenith: a randomized controlled trial on 188 implants placed in 104 patients.

Authors:  Davide Farronato; Pietro Mario Pasini; Mattia Manfredini; Cristian Scognamiglio; Andrea Alain Orsina; Marco Farronato
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.757

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.