Literature DB >> 31032676

The role of luteal support during IVF: a qualitative systematic review.

Vlatka Tomic1, Miro Kasum2, Katarina Vucic3.   

Abstract

The aim of this review is to provide qualitative evidence-based synthesis regarding efficacy of luteal-phase support on fertility outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with respect to clinical or live birth rates and pregnancy loss rates. Although the need of luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI cycles is well-known, the optimal start, dosage, route and the duration of the luteal phase support is still subject of debate. Data suggest that the optimal period to start with the luteal phase support would be between 24-72 hours after oocyte-retrieval and should continue at least until a positive pregnancy test is achieved. However, the majority of IVF-centers worldwide provide progesterone support up to 8 weeks of pregnancy. Among the well-established routes of luteal support, oral dydrogesterone and subcutaneous progesterone represent new and interesting routes of progesterone administration. The current studies support these routes of progesterone administration use in terms of comparable pregnancy rates and pregnancy loss rates to vaginal and intramuscular progesterone. Furthermore, the acceptance and tolerability among patients seems to be even better. In the frozen-thawed embryo transfer, dydrogesterone and vaginal progesterone are not effective as monotherapy treatments; however, when combined there is no reason to avoid one or the other in this setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF/ICSI cycles; Progesterone; infertility; luteal phase support; ovarian stimulation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31032676     DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1603288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  4 in total

Review 1.  The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abdulla Almohammadi; Ainharan Raveendran; Mairead Black; Abha Maheshwari
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Can biochemical pregnancy be determined 5 days after frozen-thawed embryo transfer?

Authors:  Isaac M Yadid; Thelma S Criscuolo; Jéssica F Santos; Luiz A Giordano
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2022-01-17

Review 3.  Implantation Failures and Miscarriages in Frozen Embryo Transfers Timed in Hormone Replacement Cycles (HRT): A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Dominique de Ziegler; Paul Pirtea; Jean Marc Ayoubi
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07

Review 4.  Individualized luteal phase support after fresh embryo transfer: unanswered questions, a review.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Jie Hao; Yanping Li
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.