BACKGROUND: The advantages of a minimally-invasive surgical approach compared to conventional open thoracotomy for lung resection have been previously described. While robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has shown comparable clinical outcomes for lobectomy as compared with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), the cost and inherent value associated with the robotic technology remains a main concern. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature on the cost of RATS lobectomy using studies published prior to December 2017 on MEDLINE and EMBASE. RESULTS: Six observational studies met our inclusion criteria. Median cost of RATS lobectomy ranged from $15,440 to $22,582. Operating room (OR) cost was a major contributing factor to overall cost. The lowest per-procedure cost was reported by the highest volume center. Cost definitions were highly variable among studies. The total cost of RATS was similar or lower to open lobectomy, and higher than that of VATS, with cost difference ranging from $2,901 to $4,708. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of cost for RATS lobectomy varies significantly. High OR costs may be offset by improved outcomes as compared with open lobectomy, but currently the costs exceed that of VATS lobectomy. Further work is needed to define the cost and actual value parameters for RATS lobectomy.
BACKGROUND: The advantages of a minimally-invasive surgical approach compared to conventional open thoracotomy for lung resection have been previously described. While robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has shown comparable clinical outcomes for lobectomy as compared with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), the cost and inherent value associated with the robotic technology remains a main concern. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature on the cost of RATS lobectomy using studies published prior to December 2017 on MEDLINE and EMBASE. RESULTS: Six observational studies met our inclusion criteria. Median cost of RATS lobectomy ranged from $15,440 to $22,582. Operating room (OR) cost was a major contributing factor to overall cost. The lowest per-procedure cost was reported by the highest volume center. Cost definitions were highly variable among studies. The total cost of RATS was similar or lower to open lobectomy, and higher than that of VATS, with cost difference ranging from $2,901 to $4,708. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of cost for RATS lobectomy varies significantly. High OR costs may be offset by improved outcomes as compared with open lobectomy, but currently the costs exceed that of VATS lobectomy. Further work is needed to define the cost and actual value parameters for RATS lobectomy.
Authors: Franca M A Melfi; Gian Franco Menconi; A Massimo Mariani; Carlo Alberto Angeletti Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Shaun A Deen; Jennifer L Wilson; Candice L Wilshire; Eric Vallières; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Robson E Ely; Brian E Louie Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Rachel L Medbery; Sebastian D Perez; Seth D Force; Theresa W Gillespie; Allan Pickens; Daniel L Miller; Felix G Fernandez Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Scott J Swanson; Daniel L Miller; Robert Joseph McKenna; John Howington; M Blair Marshall; Andrew C Yoo; Matthew Moore; Candace L Gunnarsson; Bryan F Meyers Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: DuyKhanh P Ceppa; Andrzej S Kosinski; Mark F Berry; Betty C Tong; David H Harpole; John D Mitchell; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Emily S Singer; Peter J Kneuertz; Jennifer Nishimura; Desmond M D'Souza; Ellen Diefenderfer; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce; Robert E Merritt Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Kate McBride; Daniel Steffens; Christina Stanislaus; Michael Solomon; Teresa Anderson; Ruban Thanigasalam; Scott Leslie; Paul G Bannon Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 2.655