Literature DB >> 31032196

Neuroanatomical substrates underlying contrast sensitivity.

Ying Yang1, Yajun Wang1, Cun Zhang1, Jiajia Zhu1, Yongqiang Yu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrast sensitivity (CS), a measurement of the ability to discriminate an object from its background, is an essential domain of visual functions. Eye aging or diseases are usually responsible for CS decline or impairment. However, whether neuroanatomical substrates are underlying CS is mostly unknown.
METHODS: High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging data of 100 healthy young subjects from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset were used to calculate gray matter volume (GMV). CS was assessed using the Mars Contrast Sensitivity Test. A multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between CS and GMV in a voxel-wise manner within the whole gray matter.
RESULTS: The range of Mars_Final scores for the 100 participants was from 1.08 to 1.88, and we found significant positive correlations between the CS scores and GMV in the bilateral visual cortex. Precisely, the significant bilateral clusters were mainly located in bilateral V3A, with the superior parts extending to the bilateral posterior parietal cortex.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest the critical role of the dorsal visual stream in CS processing, which may provide insights into the neuroanatomical mechanism of contrast sensitivity and its relation to some brain disorders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast sensitivity (CS); V3A; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); posterior parietal cortex; voxel-based morphometry (VBM)

Year:  2019        PMID: 31032196      PMCID: PMC6462580          DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.03.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  44 in total

Review 1.  Voxel-based morphometry--the methods.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Decreased color discrimination and contrast sensitivity in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  V Pieri; N J Diederich; R Raman; C G Goetz
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 3.181

3.  Defining the cortical visual systems: "what", "where", and "how".

Authors:  S H Creem; D R Proffitt
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2001-04

4.  Visual risk factors for crash involvement in older drivers with cataract.

Authors:  C Owsley; B T Stalvey; J Wells; M E Sloane; G McGwin
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-06

5.  A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains.

Authors:  C D Good; I S Johnsrude; J Ashburner; R N Henson; K J Friston; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Visual contributions to postural stability in older adults.

Authors:  S R Lord; H B Menz
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.140

7.  Perceived visual ability for independent mobility in persons with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  K A Turano; D R Geruschat; J W Stahl; R W Massof
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation.

Authors:  Sheila K West; Gary S Rubin; Aimee T Broman; Beatriz Muñoz; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Kathleen Turano
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

9.  Contrast sensitivity in subgroups of developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Monica J Williams; Geoffrey W Stuart; Anne Castles; Ken I McAnally
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  Contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Ophthalmol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.