| Literature DB >> 31031914 |
Benoit Diringer1,2, Krizia Pretell2,3, Ricardo Avellan4, Cesar Chanta1, Virna Cedeño1,2,4, Gabriele Gentile5.
Abstract
Wild populations of the pustulose ark, Anadara tuberculosa (Bivalvia), an emblematic species of the East Pacific mangrove ecosystem declined in South American countries (Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru) mainly due to overharvesting and habitat loss or degradation. Understanding the genetic aspects of geographic variations and population structure of A. tuberculosa, currently unknown, appears as a priority to fishery authorities in order to elaborate integrated and collaborative conservation policies for fishery management, aquaculture, and stock enhancement programs. We used mtDNA sequence data to investigate haplotype diversity, genetic structure, and demography of A. tuberculosa. Results indicate genetic homogeneity of populations distributed north and south of the equator, respectively. However, statistically significant differentiation emerged between northern and southern populations with pairwise ф ST values ranging between 0.036 and 0.092. The oceanic current system acting in the area (Panama Current and Humboldt Current) might play a role in limiting the larval dispersal of the species, still poorly understood. Demography reconstruction supported recent population expansion, possibly started after last glacial maximum. Our results would suggest separate and independent management of populations north and south of the equator.Entities:
Keywords: aquaculture; aquatic animal stock; last glacial maximum; mangrove habitat; mollusk; oceanic current
Year: 2019 PMID: 31031914 PMCID: PMC6476791 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Genetic diversity in Anadara tuberculosa
| Sample size | Haplotype diversity ( | Nucleotide diversity ( | No. of haplotypes | No. of private haplotypes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tumaco (Colombia) | 50 | 0.962 ± 0.019 | 0.008 ± 0.0001 | 23 | 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Esmeralda (Ecuador) | 29 | 0.874 ± 0.037 | 0.006 ± 0.0007 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Guayas (Ecuador) | 24 | 0.870 ± 0.055 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 12 | 2 |
| – | – | – | – |
| |
| El Oro (Ecuador) | 28 | 0.987 ± 0.014 | 0.008 ± 0.0007 | 24 | 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Tumbes (Peru) | 111 | 0.898 ± 0.021 | 0.006 ± 0.0005 | 39 | 20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimates obtained after randomly resampling 24 individuals from each sample are in italic.
Figure 1Sampling sites: 1) Tumaco (Colombia), 2) Esmeralda, 3) Guayas, 4) El Oro (Ecuador), 5) Tumbes (Peru). Surface oceanic circulation observed in February 2018 (a) and March 2018 (b). Current convergence (periodic median values) in the equatorial region comprised between latitude 1.8 S and 0.2 N and longitude 82.2 W and 80.2 W, from 1992 to 2015 (c). The red line indicates the equator. The overall pattern of circulation, although with some variation, tends to be stable over time
Population grouping. The first column indicates the number of groups considered. The second column denotes the combination of populations in each group, indicated by continuous black lines. We estimated the probability (p) that observed FST and фST values are lower or equal to random values. We also estimated the probability that observed FSC and фSC values are higher or equal to random values. Random values were obtained from 1000 random permuted samples
Pairwise F ST and ф ST estimates (below and above the diagonal, respectively) with correspondent statistical significance
| Tumaco (Colombia) | Esmeralda (Ecuador) | Guayas (Ecuador) | El Oro (Ecuador) | Tumbes (Peru) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tumaco (Colombia) | – | 0.025 n.s. | 0.039 | 0.040 | 0.036 |
| Esmeralda (Ecuador) | 0.011 n.s. | – | 0.092 | 0.072 | 0.087 |
| Guayas (Ecuador) | 0.024 | 0.034 | – | −0.011 n.s | 0.000 n.s. |
| El Oro (Ecuador) | 0.015 | 0.026 | 0.022 n.s. | – | 0.009 n.s |
| Tumbes (Peru) | 0.024 | 0.033 | −0.004 n.s | 0.012 n.s. | – |
n.s., not statistically significant.
p < 0.001.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.05.
Figure 2Statistical parsimony network illustrating the genealogical relationships among different haplotypes (threshold of statistical significance = 95%). The size of the circle corresponds to the haplotype frequency. Pie charts indicate the proportion at which each haplotype occurs at each location
Figure 3Mismatch distributions (pairwise differences) in Groups 1 and 2. Dotted and dashed lines indicate expected distributions under constant size and expansion models, respectively. Solid line indicates observed distributions
Demographic histories as inferred by different classes of statistics under the assumption of neutrality
| Statistics | Group 1 | Group 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obs |
| Obs |
| |
| Tajima's D | −0.635 | n.s | −1.644 |
|
| Fu and Li's D | −0.974 | n.s | −3.051 |
|
| Fu and Li's F | −0.965 | n.s | −2.862 |
|
| Fu's Fs | −12.033 |
| −46.589 |
|
| Raggedness, | 0.009 |
| 0.007 |
|
Group 1 includes Tumaco and Esmeralda, whereas Group 2 comprises Guayas, El Oro, and Tumbes.
n.s.: not statistically significant
p < 0.001
p < 0.01
p < 0.05
Figure 4Bayesian skyline plots for Groups 1 and 2. X‐axis indicates time expressed in mutation per site units. Y‐axis indicates population size expressed as the product of N e (effective population size) and μ (mutation rate)
Demographic models comparison
| Models 2 | Models 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Exp. growth | Constant size | BSP | |
| Exp. growth | – | −5.79 | −2.87 |
| Constant size | −0.06 | – | 2.92 |
| BSP | −9.47 | −9.41 | – |
Bayes factor for Group 1 (below the diagonal) and Group 2 (above the diagonal). BSP is selected for Group 1 and exponential growth for Group 2. Group 1 includes Tumaco and Esmeralda, whereas Group 2 comprises Guayas, El Oro, and Tumbes