| Literature DB >> 31031619 |
Shan Ran1, Fangfang Sun1, Yan Song1, Xiaoli Wang1, Yan Hong2, Yanquan Han1.
Abstract
Dried ginger is the monarch drug in Linggan Wuwei Jiangxin (LGWWJX) decoction, which is used to treat cold asthma. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of dried ginger and LGWWJX decoction for treatment of cold asthma rats at the metabolomics level using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). OVA and ice water-induced cold asthma were induced in SD rats. The effects of dried ginger and LGWWJX decoction were evaluated by general morphological observation, hematoxylin and eosin staining, inflammatory cell count, IgE, IL-4, IFN-γ quantitation, and visceral index. GC-MS-based metabolomics was performed and analyzed using multivariate statistical analysis. Biomarker identification, pathway analysis, correlations between identified biomarker, and efficacy indices were performed. The results showed that dried ginger and LGWWJX decoction had obvious effects on cold asthma rats. Thirty-seven metabolites (15 in serum and 22 in urine) associated with cold asthma were identified. These metabolites were mainly carbohydrates, fatty acids and their products, organic acids, and others. Seven pathways were identified by MetaboAnalyst 4.0 metabolic pathway analysis. After intervention with dried ginger and LGWWJX decoction, the majority of altered metabolites and metabolic pathways returned to control levels. LGWWJX decoction regulated more metabolites of carbohydrates and fatty acids, which contribute to energy metabolism and oxidative stress in cold asthma, than dried ginger. We concluded that dried ginger and LGWWJX decoction both were effective for treatment of cold asthma. LGWWJX decoction was more effective than dried ginger for treatment of cold asthma. This study evaluated the effects of dried ginger and LGWWJX decoction on cold asthma at the metabolomics level. It provides a reference for the research on the compatibility of Chinese Medicine.Entities:
Keywords: Linggan Wuwei Jiangxin decoction; cold asthma; compatibility; dried ginger; metabolomics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31031619 PMCID: PMC6470627 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1Pathological changes in lung tissue observed by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining (Light microscopy, ×200). 4.86 g/kg Gan Jiang and 21.6 g/kg of Linggan Wuwei Jiangxin (LGWWJX) decoction significantly reduced inflammation and pathological changes compared with the model group. LGWWJX decoction alleviated airway wall thickening and inflammatory cell infiltration to a greater extent than GJ. (A) control; (B) model; (C) Gan Jiang (GJ, 4.86 g/kg); (D) LGWWJX decoction (LGWWJX, 21.6 g/kg); (E) postive control (PC, Guilong Kechuanning, 2.43 g/kg). (a) airway wall; (b) inflammatory cell infiltration; (c) airway luminal narrowing; (d) mucous plug.
Inflammatory cells and cytokines in the four groups.
| Group | Cell count in BALF | Inflammatory cytokines in serum | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cells (× 106) | Eosinophils (%) | Mononuclear (%) | Neutrophil (%) | IgE (μg⋅mL-1) | IL-4 (ng⋅mL-1) | IFN-γ (ng⋅mL-1) | |
| C | 2.23 ± 1.27 | 1.06 ± 0.98 | 12.50 ± 1.70 | 11.25 ± 1.39 | 102.10 ± 3.47 | 248.70 ± 5.02 | 1322.00 ± 12.61 |
| M | 28.41 ± 3.24## | 30.44 ± 3.87## | 62.88 ± 2.13## | 25.31 ± 3.06## | 290.40 ± 5.96## | 927.50 ± 30.63## | 507.10 ± 16.16## |
| GJ | 3.70 ± 1.00∗∗ | 19.81 ± 5.74∗ | 42.73 ± 2.14∗∗ | 18.88 ± 2.12∗∗ | 232.20 ± 12.61∗∗ | 697.20 ± 21.45∗∗ | 1149.0 ± 30.59∗∗ |
| LGWWJX | 3.49 ± 1.13∗∗ | 9.37 ± 1.21∗∗ | 45.81 ± 2.25∗∗ | 13.87 ± 2.55∗∗ | 188.90 ± 3.45∗∗ | 512.60 ± 21.37∗∗ | 834.01 ± 26.37∗∗ |
| PC | 2.82 ± 0.30∗∗ | 5.63 ± 0.43∗∗ | 30.13 ± 0.59∗∗ | 13.13 ± 0.91∗∗ | 159.04 ± 2.60∗∗ | 407.10 ± 19.58∗∗ | 1113.20 ± 37.41∗∗ |
Visceral index results.
| Heart index | Liver index | Spleen index | Lung index | Kidney index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 0.31 ± 0.04 | 2.82 ± 0.32 | 0.23 ± 0.06 | 0.91 ± 0.25 | 0.59 ± 0.05 |
| M | 0.38 ± 0.05## | 3.11 ± 0.24 | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.96 ± 0.13## | 0.63 ± 0.06 |
| GJ | 0.35 ± 0.07∗∗ | 2.99 ± 0.35 | 0.24 ± 0.06 | 0.92 ± 0.24∗∗ | 0.63 ± 0.09 |
| LGWWJX | 0.33 ± 0.05∗∗ | 2.85 ± 1.12 | 0.22 ± 0.07 | 0.83 ± 0.22∗∗ | 0.63 ± 0.07 |
| PC | 0.31 ± 0.05∗∗ | 2.80 ± 0.33∗ | 0.24 ± 0.07 | 0.90 ± 0.26∗∗ | 0.61 ± 0.06 |
FIGURE 2Representative GC–MS TIC chromatograms of control (C), model (M), Gan Jiang (GJ) decoction, and LGWWJX decoction groups in rat serum (A) and urine (B).
FIGURE 3Score plots from the PCA model of the control group (green) vs. the model group (black) for (A) serum and (B) urine. Two hundred permutations of the PLS-DA model for serum (C) and urine (D). R2 (green triangle); Q2 (blue square). Score plots form the OPLS-DA model of the control group (C, green) vs. the model group (M, black) for serum (E) and urine (F). S-Plots from the OPLS-DA model for serum (G) and urine (H).
FIGURE 4OPLS-DA scores 3D plots. (A) Comparison of C (green), M (black), GJ (red), and LGWWJX (yellow) in serum (R2X = 0.855, R2Y = 0.896, Q2 = 0.659). (B) Comparison of C (green), M (black), GJ (red), and LGWWJX (yellow) in urine (R2X = 0.817, R2Y = 0.899, Q2 = 0.639).
Potential biomarkers to distinguish control group rats, cold asthma rats, and rats treated with GJ and LGWWJX decoctions.
| RT/min | Endogenous metabolites | M/Z | VIP | Match | Regulation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-M | M-GJ | M-LGWWJX | |||||||
| Sm1 | 5.333 | Propanoic acid | 28, 45, 73, 88, 117, 147, 191, 219 | 1.23 | 0.000 | 953 | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ |
| Sm2 | 8.449 | Glycerol | 73, 103, 133, 147, 177, 205, 218 | 1.01 | 0.012 | 881 | ↓ | / | / |
| Sm3 | 9.889 | Glycine | 45, 73, 86, 133, 147, 174, 188, 248, 276 | 1.72 | 0.023 | 824 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Sm4 | 11.115 | Phosphate(3:1) | 45, 73, 133, 211, 253, 283, 299, 314 | 1.43 | 0.015 | 776 | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ |
| Sm5 | 19.798 | Heptadecane | 57, 71, 85, 99, 127, 155, 238 | 1.16 | 0.000 | 792 | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ |
| Sm6 | 22.088 | 73, 147, 159, 247, 260, 318, 433 | 1.61 | 0.033 | 867 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| Sm7 | 22.49 | 15, 45, 73, 103, 133, 147, 189, 217, 307, 466 | 1.96 | 0.000 | 874 | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| Sm8 | 22.634 | 73, 103, 147, 205, 217, 319, 345 | 1.18 | 0.000 | 858 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| Sm9 | 22.853 | 45, 59, 73, 103, 129, 147, 160, 205, 217, 229, 291, 319 | 1.26 | 0.000 | 922 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| Sm10 | 23.069 | 73, 103, 147, 205, 268, 319 | 1.40 | 0.015 | 922 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| Sm11 | 24.363 | Glucopyranose | 73, 103, 129, 147, 191, 204, 217, 231 | 1.16 | 0.004 | 834 | ↓ | / | ↑ |
| Sm12 | 25.131 | Myoinositol | 73, 103, 129, 147, 217, 305, 343, 432 | 1.14 | 0.000 | 891 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Sm13 | 27.786 | Hexadecanoic acid | 29, 43, 73, 83, 117, 132, 145, 159, 201, 243, 269, 313, 328 | 1.07 | 0.009 | 899 | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ |
| Sm14 | 32.181 | Octadecanoic acid | 43, 55, 73, 117, 132, 145, 201, 243, 269, 341, 356 | 1.13 | 0.003 | 887 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Sm15 | 38.921 | Lactose | 73, 89, 103, 147, 204, 243, 271, 319 | 1.25 | 0.000 | 895 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Um1 | 10.938 | Phosphate(3:1) | 73, 115, 133, 211, 283, 299, 314 | 1.01 | 0.014 | 938 | ↓ | / | ↑ |
| Um2 | 12.122 27.151 | Benzoic acid | 77, 105, 117, 147, 179, 194 | 1.15 | 0.021 | 923 | ↑ | / | ↓ |
| Um3 | 12.932 | Butanedioic acid | 73, 129, 147, 172, 247 | 1.16 | 0.000 | 935 | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ |
| Um4 | 14.120 | 3, 4-Dihydroxyb-utanoic acid | 73, 147, 189, 233, 246, 300 | 1.13 | 0.021 | 914 | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Um5 | 16.996 | 73, 117, 147, 205, 292, 409 | 1.01 | 0.036 | 920 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| Um6 | 19.630 | 73, 103, 147, 205, 217, 243, 307, 395 | 1.08 | 0.009 | 913 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| Um7 | 20.367, 20.509, 21.292 | 73, 89, 117, 133, 147, 201, 231 | 1. 02 | 0.040 | 867 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| Um8 | 21.160 | Pentanedioic acid | 73, 112, 147, 186198, 229, 260, 288 | 1.06 | 0.009 | 850 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Um9 | 21.292 | Hexanedioic acid | 73, 109, 129, 147, 203, 233, 247, 363 | 1.21 | 0.009 | 774 | ↑ | / | / |
| Um10 | 21.406 | Ribonic acid | 73, 103, 147, 217, 292, 307 | 1.09 | 0.002 | 909 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Um11 | 21.814 | Benzeneacetic acid | 73, 89, 105, 147, 164, 179, 252, 281 | 1.08 | 0.015 | 878 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Um12 | 22.380 | β- | 73, 147, 191, 204, 291, 345, 435 | 1.42 | 0.000 | 928 | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Um13 | 22.853 | 73, 103, 147, 160, 205, 217, 319 | 1.01 | 0.002 | 923 | ↓ | / | ↑ | |
| Um14 | 22.862 | 73, 147, 160, 205, 217, 229, 291, 319 | 1.18 | 0.000 | 930 | ↓ | / | ↑ | |
| Um15 | 23.420 | Citric acid | 73, 147, 183, 211, 231, 273, 285, 363, 465 | 1.01 | 0.006 | 910 | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ |
| Um16 | 23.958 | Glucaric acid | 73, 103, 147, 292, 333, 423 | 1.00 | 0.010 | 708 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Um17 | 25.138 | Myo-inositol | 73, 103, 147, 265, 305, 367, 432 | 1.001 | 0.012 | 879 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Um18 | 25.523 | 73, 133, 147, 205, 243, 274, 361, 391 | 1.08 | 0.042 | 800 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| Um19 | 38.591 | β-Glucuronide | 73, 103, 147, 180, 257, 375 | 1.07 | 0.000 | 923 | ↓ | / | / |
| Um20 | 38.821 | 73, 103, 129, 147, 204, 217, 319, 361, 392 | 1.147 | 0.000 | 928 | ↓ | / | ↑ | |
| Um21 | 39.434 | Maltose | 73, 147, 204, 217, 361, 373, 392 | 1.19 | 0.000 | 824 | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Um22 | 40.406 | 73, 103, 147, 191, 204, 217, 243, 361, 373, 393 | 1.17 | 0.000 | 928 | ↓ | / | / | |
FIGURE 5Expression levels of differentially expressed metabolites in serum. (A) Propanoic acid; (B) Glycerol; (C) Glycine; (D) Phosphate (3:1); (E) Heptadecane; (F) D-Pinitol; (G) D-(–)Tagatose; (H) D-Mannitol; (I) D-Galactose; (J) D-Glucose; (K) Glucopyranose; (L) Myoinositol; (M) Hexadecanoic acid; (N) Octadecanoic acid; (O) Lactose. C, control group; M, model group; GJ, GanJiang decoction group; LGWWJX, LGWWJX decoction group. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared with the control group. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, compared with the model group.
FIGURE 6Levels differentially expressed metabolites in urine. (A) Phosphate(3:1); (B) Benzoic acid; (C) Butanedioic acid; (D) 3, 4-Dihydroxybutanoicacid; (E) L-threonic; (F) D-(+)arabitol; (G) L-(–)Fructose; (H) Pentanedioic acid; (I) Hexanedioic acid; (J) Ribonic acid; (K) Benzeneacetic acid; (L) β-D-Glucopyranose; (M) D-Glucose; (N) D-Galactose; (O) Citric acid; (P) Glucaric acid; (Q) Myoinositol; (R) L-Ascorbic acid; (S) β-Glucuronide; (T) D-Lactose; (U) Maltose; (V) D-(+)Cellobiose. C, control group; M, model group; GJ, Gan Jiang decoction group; LGWWJX, LGWWJX decoction group. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared with the control group. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, compared with the model group.
FIGURE 7Summary of pathway analysis of serum and urine samples from cold asthma rats. (a) Starch and sucrose metabolism; (b) Galactose metabolism; (c) Tricarboxylic acid cycle; (d) Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate; (e) Glycerol phospholipid metabolism; (f) Glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism; (g) Inositol phosphate metabolism.
FIGURE 8Correlation map of rat serum and urine metabolites and pharmacodynamics indices according to Pearson correlation coefficients. Degrees of correlation degrees are shown using a color scale from significantly negatively correlated (blue) to significantly positively correlated (red).