Brook Sawyer1, Sally Atkins-Burnett2, Lia Sandilos3, Carol Scheffner Hammer4, Lisa Lopez5, Clancy Blair6. 1. Department of Education and Human Services, Lehigh University. 2. Department of Education and Human Services, Mathematica Policy Institute. 3. Department of Education and Human Services, Temple University. 4. Department of Education and Human Services, Teachers College, Columbia University. 5. Department of Education and Human Services, University of South Florida. 6. Department of Education and Human Services, New York University.
Abstract
RESEARCH FINDINGS: This study aimed to (a) provide an in-depth description of the frequency and type of language interactions that children who are low-income and/or dual language learners (DLL) experience in their classrooms and (b) examine whether differenceFor instance, in a randomized control trial with 461 first grade s exist in children's language experiences based on children's DLL status and level of English proficiency. Using the Language Interaction Snapshot, we observed four focal children in each of 72 early childhood classrooms: one monolingual English-speaking child (i.e., non-DLL), one Spanish-dominant DLL child, and two bilingual Spanish-English DLL children. Findings indicate that both lead and assistant teachers predominantly spoke in English and implemented few evidence-based language practices. Children spoke more often to peers than to teachers. Little variation was noted in the quality of the language environment for children based on their DLL status or language proficiency. PRACTICE: Results suggest clear directions for professional development (PD). PD must include both lead and assistant teachers and should focus on evidence-based language strategies for facilitating children's language development, including how to effectively teach DLLs. Teachers may also benefit from PD that supports use of small group activity and peer strategies.
RESEARCH FINDINGS: This study aimed to (a) provide an in-depth description of the frequency and type of language interactions that children who are low-income and/or dual language learners (DLL) experience in their classrooms and (b) examine whether differenceFor instance, in a randomized control trial with 461 first grade s exist in children's language experiences based on children's DLL status and level of English proficiency. Using the Language Interaction Snapshot, we observed four focal children in each of 72 early childhood classrooms: one monolingual English-speaking child (i.e., non-DLL), one Spanish-dominant DLL child, and two bilingual Spanish-English DLL children. Findings indicate that both lead and assistant teachers predominantly spoke in English and implemented few evidence-based language practices. Children spoke more often to peers than to teachers. Little variation was noted in the quality of the language environment for children based on their DLL status or language proficiency. PRACTICE: Results suggest clear directions for professional development (PD). PD must include both lead and assistant teachers and should focus on evidence-based language strategies for facilitating children's language development, including how to effectively teach DLLs. Teachers may also benefit from PD that supports use of small group activity and peer strategies.
Authors: Carol McDonald Connor; Shayne B Piasta; Barry Fishman; Stephanie Glasney; Christopher Schatschneider; Elizabeth Crowe; Phyllis Underwood; Frederick J Morrison Journal: Child Dev Date: 2009 Jan-Feb