Literature DB >> 31031156

Midterm Performance of a Guided-Motion Bicruciate-Stabilized Total Knee System: Results From the International Study of Over 2000 Consecutive Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties.

Adam I Harris1, Bernhard Christen2, Jan J Malcorps3, Christopher P O'Grady4, Branko Kopjar5, Paul R Sensiba6, Hilde Vandenneucker7, Bill K Huang8, Harold E Cates9, John Hur10, Dante A Marra11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilizing Total Knee System (BLINDED) is a second-generation guided-motion knee implant that has been used in over 100,000 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) worldwide. However, performance information is limited.
METHODS: Data for 2059 primary TKAs were abstracted at 7 US and 3 European sites. Estimates of cumulative incidence of revision were compared with registry data for cemented posterior-stabilized implants.
RESULTS: Average age was 64.3 years (range, 18-91); 58.5% were females; and 12.3% TKAs were in subjects younger than 55 years. Patellae were resurfaced in 95.9%. Median time since primary TKA was 4.2 years; longest was 6.1 years; and 78.9% were 3 years or more since primary TKA. Of 67 revisions (3.2%), 20 (30%) involved femoral or tibial component removal compared to 42% in the Australian Joint Registry (Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry). All-component revisions accounted for 15 of 67, femoral component only for 2 of 67, tibial component only for 3 of 67, patellar component with/without tibial insert exchange for 17 of 67, and isolated tibial insert exchange for 30 of 67. In addition, there were 18 reoperations without component exchange. Component revision indications were infection (33%), mechanical loosening (21%), fracture of bone around the joint (16%), and instability (15%). Kaplan-Meier revision estimate was 3.1 and 3.6 per 100 TKAs at 3 and 5 years, respectively, compared to Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry estimates of 3.1 and 4.1 per 100 TKAs.
CONCLUSION: The revision rate for the second-generation implant was similar to cemented posterior-stabilized registry controls.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kaplan-Meier; bicruciate; guided motion; posterior stabilized; revision; total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2019        PMID: 31031156     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Fixed Tibial Inserts: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  John Krumme; Roma Kankaria; Madana Vallem; John Cyrus; Peter Sculco; Gregory Golladay; Niraj Kalore
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-06-27

2.  Do obese patients benefit from a kinematic, appropriately designed total knee prosthesis?

Authors:  David A Kolin; Kaitlin M Carroll; Michael P Ast; David J Mayman; Steven B Haas; Fred Cushner
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-03

3.  Maximal flexion and patient outcomes after TKA, using a bicruciate-stabilizing design.

Authors:  Nienke M Kosse; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Koen C Defoort; Ate B Wymenga; Gijs G van Hellemondt
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.067

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.