| Literature DB >> 31030601 |
Angel Joel Cadena1, Sara Habib1, Fred Rincon1, Stephanie Dobak2.
Abstract
Malnutrition is frequently seen among patients in the intensive care unit. Evidence shows that optimal nutritional support can lead to better clinical outcomes. Recent clinical trials debate over the efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) over parenteral nutrition (PN). Multiple trials have studied the impact of EN versus PN in terms of health-care cost and clinical outcomes (including functional status, cost, infectious complications, mortality risk, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and mechanical ventilation duration). The aim of this review is to address the question: In critically ill adult patients requiring nutrition support, does EN compared to PN favorably impact clinical outcomes and health-care costs?Entities:
Keywords: critical care; critically ill patients; enteral nutrition; intensive care unit; literature review; nutrition; parenteral nutrition
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31030601 DOI: 10.1177/0885066619843782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Intensive Care Med ISSN: 0885-0666 Impact factor: 3.510