Literature DB >> 31030578

Fifteen years of patient reporting -what have we learned and where are we heading to?

Florence van Hunsel1, Linda Härmark1, Leàn Rolfes1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In April 2003, the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb successfully implemented patient reporting to their spontaneous reporting system. The number of reports by patients rapidly grew, prompting the need to evaluate the value of the patient reporting scheme and to compare experiences with other countries. The aim of this article is to summarize our 15-year experience of working with direct patient reporting in pharmacovigilance and to discuss necessary steps in order to optimize the use of patient reports in the future. AREAS COVERED: This article is based on Lareb studies on patient reporting from 2004 onwards and covers the evolution of the Dutch patient reporting system, the value of patient participation in pharmacovigilance, the impact of patient reporting on the spontaneous reporting system and future steps to strengthen patient reporting. EXPERT OPINION: After 15 years of experience with patient reporting we conclude that patients can add value to pharmacovigilance. We recognize that there is a big leap between allowing patients to report and actual patient involvement in pharmacovigilance. It is our belief that increased patient involvement in pharmacovigilance is a way to improve pharmacovigilance, enhancing the general public's trust in medicines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient reporting; patient participation; pharmacovigilance; signal detection; spontaneous reporting system

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31030578     DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2019.1613373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf        ISSN: 1474-0338            Impact factor:   4.250


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of Reports on Adverse Drug Reactions Related to Herbal Medicinal Products and Herbal Supplements in the Netherlands Received by the National Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb.

Authors:  Florence P A M van Hunsel; Djurre van der Kooi; Sonja van de Koppel; Burt H Kroes; Herman J Woerdenbag
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  The Importance of Direct Patient Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the Safety Monitoring Process.

Authors:  Kamila Sienkiewicz; Monika Burzyńska; Izabela Rydlewska-Liszkowska; Jacek Sienkiewicz; Ewelina Gaszyńska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  The value of direct patient reporting in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Kruger Paola; Gasperini Claudio
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2020-10-26

4.  Identifying and managing adverse drug reactions: Qualitative analysis of patient reports to the UK yellow card scheme.

Authors:  Bernadine O' Donovan; Ruth M Rodgers; Anthony R Cox; Janet Krska
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.716

Review 5.  Factors Contributing to Best Practices for Patient Involvement in Pharmacovigilance in Europe: A Stakeholder Analysis.

Authors:  Monica van Hoof; Katherine Chinchilla; Linda Härmark; Cristiano Matos; Pedro Inácio; Florence van Hunsel
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.228

6.  Patient Organizations' Barriers in Pharmacovigilance and Strategies to Stimulate Their Participation.

Authors:  Katherine Chinchilla; Cristiano Matos; Victoria Hall; Florence van Hunsel
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 5.606

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.