| Literature DB >> 31030239 |
Kimiho Omae1, Yuto Fukuyama1, Hisato Yasuda2, Kenta Mise1, Takashi Yoshida1, Yoshihiko Sako3.
Abstract
In hydrothermal environments, carbon monoxide (CO) utilisation by thermophilic hydrogenogenic carboxydotrophs may play an important role in microbial ecology by reducing toxic levels of CO and providing H2 for fuelling microbial communities. We evaluated thermophilic hydrogenogenic carboxydotrophs by microbial community analysis. First, we analysed the correlation between carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (CODH)-energy-converting hydrogenase (ECH) gene cluster and taxonomic affiliation by surveying an increasing genomic database. We identified 71 genome-encoded CODH-ECH gene clusters, including 46 whose owners were not reported as hydrogenogenic carboxydotrophs. We identified 13 phylotypes showing > 98.7% identity with these taxa as potential hydrogenogenic carboxydotrophs in hot springs. Of these, Firmicutes phylotypes such as Parageobacillus, Carboxydocella, Caldanaerobacter, and Carboxydothermus were found in different environmental conditions and distinct microbial communities. The relative abundance of the potential thermophilic hydrogenogenic carboxydotrophs was low. Most of them did not show any symbiotic networks with other microbes, implying that their metabolic activities might be low.Entities:
Keywords: Carboxydotroph; Hot spring; Hydrogenogen; Microbial community analysis; Next-generation sequencing; Thermophile
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31030239 PMCID: PMC6687684 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-019-01661-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Microbiol ISSN: 0302-8933 Impact factor: 2.552
Prokaryotes possessing CODH–ECH gene clusters
| Organism | Hydrogenogenic carboxydotrophic growth | Isolation source | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | References | ||
|
| |||
| Yes (Sokolova et al. | Water and mud | Sokolova et al. ( | |
|
| |||
| Yes (Kozhevnikova et al. | Deep-sea hydrothermal fields | Kozhevnikova et al. ( | |
| Yes (Kozhevnikova et al. | Deep-sea hydrothermal fields | Kozhevnikova et al. ( | |
| n.r | Hydrothermal vent sediment | Canganella et al. ( | |
| Yes (Bae et al. | Deep-sea hydrothermal fields | Bae et al. ( | |
| n.r | Active hydrothermal vent chimneys | Hensley et al. ( | |
| Yes (Sokolova et al. | Active chimney | Sokolova et al. ( | |
|
| |||
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| Yes (Mohr et al. | n.r | Suzuki et al. ( | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| Yes (Inoue et al. | Marine sediment | Inoue et al. ( | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| Yes (Fukuyama et al. | Open-air stream from a hot spring well | Fukuyama et al. ( | |
| Yes (Fukuyama et al. | Sediment of a maar lake | Fukuyama et al. ( | |
| Yes (Slepova et al. | Hot spring | Slepova et al. ( | |
| Yes (Toshchakov et al. | Thermal field | Toshchakov et al. ( | |
| Yes (Sokolova et al. | Terrestrial hot vent | Sokolova et al. ( | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| Yes (Parshina et al. | Anaerobic bioreactor sludge | Sokolova et al. ( | |
| Yes (Zavarzina et al. | Ferric deposits of a terrestrial hydrothermal spring | Zavarzina et al. ( | |
| Yes (Wrighton et al. | Thermophilic microbial fuel cell | Wrighton et al. ( | |
| Yes (Sokolova et al. | Oilfields | Fardeau et al. ( | |
| n.r | Oilfields | Fardeau et al. ( | |
| n.r | Oilfields | Fardeau et al. ( | |
| Yes (Yoneda et al. | Submerged marine caldera | Yoneda et al. ( | |
| Yes (Svetlichny et al. | Hot swamp | Svetlichny et al. ( | |
| Yes (Novikov et al. | Hot spring | Novikov et al. ( | |
| n.r | Underground gas storage | Slobodkin et al. ( | |
| n.r | Thermophilic anaerobic digestion reactor | Harada et al. ( | |
| Yes (Alves et al. | Anaerobic sludge | Alves et al. ( | |
| Yes (Jiang et al. | Anaerobic bioreactors | Jiang et al. ( | |
| n.r | Geothermal aquifer in mine | Mori et al. ( | |
| n.r | Geothermal hot spring | Peng et al. ( | |
| Yes (Sokolova et al. | Hot spring | Sokolova et al. ( | |
|
| |||
| n.r | River sediment | Oda et al. ( | |
| n.r | Anaerobic sludge | Esquivel-Elizondo et al. ( | |
| n.r | Intertidal marine sponge | Alex and Antunes ( | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| Yes (Kerby et al. | Fresh water | Munk et al. ( | |
| Yes (Singer et al. | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | Marine sediment | Haouari et al. ( | |
| n.r | Wood falls at deep sea | Khelaifia et al. ( | |
| n.r | Subsurface sediments | Nevin et al. ( | |
| n.r | Kaolin clays | Shelobolina et al. ( | |
| n.r | Sediment | Nakagawa et al. ( | |
| | n.r | Alimentary tract of littleneck clams | Nakagawa et al. ( |
| n.r | Coastal sediment | Ji et al. ( | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| Yes (Oh et al. | Anaerobic wastewater sludge digester | Jung et al. ( | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | n.r | n.r | |
| n.r | Sediment | Srinivas et al. ( | |
|
| n.r | n.r | |
| Candidatus Korarchaeota archaeon MDKW | n.r | Hot springs metagenomes | n.r |
| Clostridiales bacterium DRI-13 | n.r | Subglacial ecosystem | n.r |
| Rhizobiales bacterium AFS016371 | n.r | Soil | n.r |
| Rhizobiales bacterium AFS041951 | n.r | Soil | n.r |
| Rhizobiales bacterium AFS049984 | n.r | Soil | n.r |
| Rhizobiales bacterium AFS089140 | n.r | Soil | n.r |
n.r. not reported
aTwo genomes are available for this strain in the database
Summary of samples
| Sampling area and time point | Sampling date | Numbers of samples | Temperature (°C) | pH | ORP (mV) | Salinity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1405_Unagi | May 2014 | 13 | 41.4 ~ 99.0 | 2.2 ~ 4.9 | − 218 ~ + 426 | n.m |
| 1505_Unagi | May 2015 | 15 | 33.8 ~ 95.8 | 4.4 ~ 5.8 | − 174 ~ + 277 | n.m |
| 1511_Unagi | November 2015 | 19 | 41.2 ~ 96.2 | 3.3 ~ 5.6 | − 130 ~ + 449 | n.m |
| 1612_Unagi | December 2016 | 18 | 35.5 ~ 96.9 | 2.6 ~ 5.9 | − 262 ~ + 164 | n.m |
| 1612_Kirishima | December 2016 | 10 | 63.4 ~ 88.7 | 2.4 ~ 4.1 | − 179 ~ + 310 | 0 |
| 1703_Komatsu | March 2017 | 14 | 61.1 ~ 80.9 | 2.2 ~ 5.6 | − 179 ~ + 286 | n.m |
| 1501_Eastern_Izu | January 2015 | 5 | 68.2 ~ 80.1 | 8.4 ~ 8.5 | − 22 ~ + 189 | 0.0 ~ 0.2 |
| 1501_Southern_Izu | January 2015 | 5 | 60.1 ~ 78.5 | 7.7 ~ 8.9 | − 30 ~ + 259 | 0.0 ~ 2.4 |
| 1612_Unagi-ike_lake | December 2016 | 1 | 17.5 | 7.37 | 75 | n.m |
n.m. not measured
Fig. 1Non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. Plot colours illustrate sampling area and period
Fig. 2Phylogenetic reconstruction of potential thermophilic hydrogenogenic carboxydotrophic phylotypes of the Phylum Firmicutes. The 16S rRNA sequences used in this analysis are listed in Online Resource 6. Other but identical sequences to their leaves are shown in parenthesis (only one sequence per genome are shown). The phylotype sequences obtained in this study are expressed by ‘operational taxonomic unit (OTU)’ prefix. Microbes possessing CODH − ECH gene clusters and Carboxydothermus pertinax (cpu_RS09700) are shown in red font. Nodes supported by a bootstrap value greater than 80% are indicated by black circles. The bubble plots which are shown at the right of OTUs display the distribution pattern of each phylotype. Abundance is indicated by the number of amplicon reads in each sample