Literature DB >> 31030152

Source and potential risk assessment of suspended atmospheric microplastics in Shanghai.

Kai Liu1, Xiaohui Wang1, Tao Fang2, Pei Xu1, Lixin Zhu1, Daoji Li3.   

Abstract

A growing body of research has recently revealed that airborne microplastics could be an important source of microplastic pollution in marine environments. However, the origins and spatial distributions of suspended atmospheric microplastics (SAMPs) are poorly understood. Further, SAMPs abundances have only been observed using passive sampling devices that could lead to underestimates of abundances. To address these knowledge-gaps, the current study investigated the potential source and spatial distribution of SAMPs in Shanghai during May 2018 using an active suspended particulate sampler. SAMPs abundances from filtered air ranged from 0 to 4.18 n/m3 (items per cubic meter of air). Microfibers comprised 67% of all SAMPs, followed by fragments and granules comprising 30% and 3% of SAMPs, respectively. μ-FT-IR analysis revealed that the SAMPs consisted of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE), polyester (PES), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), poly(N-methyl acrylamide) (PAA), rayon (RY), ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), epoxy resin (EP), and alkyd resin (ALK). Synthetic compounds comprised 54% of the observed particles, of which PET, PE, PES, PAN, PAA, and RY comprised 91% of the microplastics. Our preliminary evaluation indicated that textile clothes are likely major source of the airborne microplastics. Modeling estimated that approximately 120.7 kg of SAMPs are annually transported through Shanghai air. Moreover, an estimation of the ecological risk from SAMPs indicated that a minor ecological consequence was present, necessitating further evaluation of SAMPs pollution. In addition, modeling estimated that approximately 21 particles of microplastics are inhaled daily by people in Shanghai from outdoor environments. Given the prevalence of airborne microfibers, it is critically urgent to reevaluate procedures for sampling, transporting, and processing microplastic field samples. Future investigations should seek to develop more rigorous and conclusive methods to evaluate these types of samples.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atmosphere; Composition; Distribution; Suspended atmospheric microplastics

Year:  2019        PMID: 31030152     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  20 in total

1.  Direct radiative effects of airborne microplastics.

Authors:  Laura E Revell; Peter Kuma; Eric C Le Ru; Walter R C Somerville; Sally Gaw
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Airborne microplastics: a review study on method for analysis, occurrence, movement and risks.

Authors:  Christian Ebere Enyoh; Andrew Wirnkor Verla; Evelyn Ngozi Verla; Francis Chizoruo Ibe; Collins Emeka Amaobi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Environmental fate and impacts of microplastics in aquatic ecosystems: a review.

Authors:  Sen Du; Rongwen Zhu; Yujie Cai; Ning Xu; Pow-Seng Yap; Yunhai Zhang; Yide He; Yongjun Zhang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 4.  An emerging class of air pollutants: Potential effects of microplastics to respiratory human health?

Authors:  Luís Fernando Amato-Lourenço; Luciana Dos Santos Galvão; Letty A de Weger; Pieter S Hiemstra; Martina G Vijver; Thais Mauad
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 5.  Immunotoxicity and intestinal effects of nano- and microplastics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Nell Hirt; Mathilde Body-Malapel
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 9.400

6.  Accumulation of airborne microplastics in lichens from a landfill dumping site (Italy).

Authors:  Stefano Loppi; Brett Roblin; Luca Paoli; Julian Aherne
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Environmental Impacts of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: A Current Overview.

Authors:  Ayodeji Amobonye; Prashant Bhagwat; Sindhu Raveendran; Suren Singh; Santhosh Pillai
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Evidence of free tropospheric and long-range transport of microplastic at Pic du Midi Observatory.

Authors:  S Allen; D Allen; F Baladima; V R Phoenix; J L Thomas; G Le Roux; J E Sonke
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  An easy method for processing and identification of natural and synthetic microfibers and microplastics in indoor and outdoor air.

Authors:  Joana C Prata; Joana L Castro; João P da Costa; Armando C Duarte; Mário Cerqueira; Teresa Rocha-Santos
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2019-12-04

Review 10.  Newly Emerging Airborne Pollutants: Current Knowledge of Health Impact of Micro and Nanoplastics.

Authors:  Alessio Facciolà; Giuseppa Visalli; Marianna Pruiti Ciarello; Angela Di Pietro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.