Literature DB >> 31029509

Surgical outcomes of patients with diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumours: an international, retrospective, cohort study.

Monique J L Mastboom1, Emanuela Palmerini2, Floortje G M Verspoor3, Anja J Rueten-Budde4, Silvia Stacchiotti5, Eric L Staals6, Gerard R Schaap7, Paul C Jutte8, Will Aston9, Hans Gelderblom10, Andreas Leithner11, Dietmar Dammerer12, Akihiko Takeuchi13, Quirina Thio14, Xiaohui Niu15, Jay S Wunder16, Michiel A J van de Sande17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour is a rare, locally aggressive, and difficult-to-treat soft tissue tumour. Clinical and surgical outcomes depend on multiple factors, including preoperative diagnostic assessment, the localisation and extent of disease, and possibly the choice of treatment modalities by orthopaedic surgeons. We did a retrospective cohort study to characterise global surgical treatment protocols, and assess surgical outcomes, complications, and functional results in patients with diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumours.
METHODS: In this international, multicentre, retrospective cohort study, we included consecutive patients treated in 31 sarcoma reference centres between Jan 1, 1990, and Dec 31, 2017. Eligible patients were of any age and had histologically proven diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour of large joints. Patient data were retrieved from the local databases of participating centres. Patients with localised-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour were excluded. In the analysis, we only included patients with complete core criteria data regarding admission status, date of treatment, type of treatment at participating centre, and first local recurrence after treatment. We used a non-parametric method to estimate recurrence-free survival at 3, 5, and 10 years after initial surgical resection in a tertiary centre. We used a multivariate Cox regression model to estimate the effect of risk factors. We also present subgroup analyses of disease status at presentation (primary vs recurrent disease) and recurrence-free survival by surgery type (open surgery vs arthroscopic synovectomy), and prespecified risk factors were tested in a univariate and multivariable analyses, with an endpoint of first local recurrence after treatment in a tertiary centre.
FINDINGS: Data collection for these analyses occurred between January, 2016, and May, 2018. We received the records of 1192 patients, of which 966 (81%) were surgically treated and had complete information on core criteria. 445 patients were admitted with therapy-naive disease of the knee and were primarily treated in a tertiary centre. Since patients with wait and see treatment do not have a starting date of treatment, these patients were excluded in the calculation of median follow-up time for all patients. For this calculation we used time of surgery as a starting date. 758 (64%) of 1192 patients had knee involvement and 628 (54%) of 1163 patients with complete data on type of surgery had one-staged open synovectomy. At a median follow-up of 54 months (IQR 27-97), recurrent disease developed in 425 (44%) of all 966 surgically treated cases, and recurrence-free survival was 62% (95% CI 59-65) at 3 years, 55% (51-58) at 5 years, and 40% (35-45) at 10 years. Surgical complications were reported in 105 (12%) of 906 patients who had complete data on surgical complications. Pain improved after surgical treatment in 255 (59%) of 434 patients and swelling improved in 328 (72%) of 453 patients who had complete data.
INTERPRETATION: This study of patients with diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour provides a comprehensive and up-to-date disease overview, assessing the clinical profile and management of the disease in multiple specialised referral centres. Surgical treatment of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumours is not a definitive treatment for every patient because it involves a high risk for local recurrent disease and a relatively high risk for postoperative complications. After surgical treatment in treatment-naive patients, risk factors for recurrent disease in individual patients were not identified in what we believe is the largest cohort to date. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31029509     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30100-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  15 in total

1.  Unusual Uptake of [131I] in a Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumour Relapse in a Patient with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Francisco Manuel Cañete Sánchez; Leonardo Gabriel Romero Robles; Xavier Louis Boulvard Chollet; María Mangas Losada; Puy Garrastachu; Antonio Cabrera Villegas; Rafael Ramírez Lasanta; Roberto Delgado Bolton
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2022-06-27

2.  Neoplastic synovial lining cells that coexpress podoplanin and CD90 overproduce CSF-1, driving tenosynovial giant cell tumor.

Authors:  Andrew C Chandler; Mohamed Yakoub; Tomohiro Fujiwara; Laura T Donlin; Paul Edward Purdue; John H Healey
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.102

3.  Clinical comparison of tenosynovial giant cell tumors, synovial chondromatosis, and synovial sarcoma: analysis and report of 53 cases.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Man-Mei Long; Cheng-Jiang Wei; Xi-Wei Cui; Jie-Yi Ren; Yi-Hui Gu; Qing-Feng Li; Shun-Dong Dai; Bin Gu; Zhi-Chao Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

4.  Pexidartinib Long-Term Hepatic Safety Profile in Patients with Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors.

Authors:  James H Lewis; Hans Gelderblom; Michiel van de Sande; Silvia Stacchiotti; John H Healey; William D Tap; Andrew J Wagner; Antonio Lopez Pousa; Mihaela Druta; Chia-Chi Lin; Hideo A Baba; Youngsook Choi; Qiang Wang; Dale E Shuster; Sebastian Bauer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-12-24

5.  Long term term follow-up of tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatments in inoperable or relapsing diffuse type tenosynovial giant cell tumors (dTGCT).

Authors:  Mehdi Brahmi; Philippe Cassier; Armelle Dufresne; Sylvie Chabaud; Marie Karanian; Alexandra Meurgey; Amine Bouhamama; Francois Gouin; Gualter Vaz; Jerome Garret; Marie-Pierre Sunyach; Aurélien Dupré; Perrine Marec-Berard; Nadège Corradini; David Perol; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Jean-Yves Blay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (dt-TGCT) patient journey: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Nicholas M Bernthal; Geert Spierenburg; John H Healey; Emanuela Palmerini; Sebastian Bauer; Hans Gelderblom; Eric L Staals; Julio Lopez-Bastida; Eva-Maria Fronk; Xin Ye; Petra Laeis; Michiel A J van de Sande
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.123

7.  Treatment, recurrence rates and follow-up of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) of the foot and ankle-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Siegel; L Bode; N Südkamp; J Kühle; J Zwingmann; H Schmal; G W Herget
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Pexidartinib in the Management of Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: Focus on Patient Selection and Special Considerations.

Authors:  Anna Vaynrub; John H Healey; William Tap; Max Vaynrub
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Economic burden and health-related quality of life in tenosynovial giant-cell tumour patients in Europe: an observational disease registry.

Authors:  J Lopez-Bastida; I Aranda-Reneo; B Rodríguez-Sánchez; L M Peña-Longobardo; X Ye; P Laeis; E M Fronk; E Palmerini; A Leithner; M A J Van de Sande
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Management of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: A Neoplastic and Inflammatory Disease.

Authors:  John H Healey; Nicholas M Bernthal; Michiel van de Sande
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.