Literature DB >> 31029020

Cue-related processing accounts for age differences in phasic alerting.

Iris Wiegand1, Myriam C Sander2.   

Abstract

Alertness is fundamental for the efficiency of information processing. A person's level of alertness refers to the system's state of general responsiveness and can be temporarily increased by presenting a neutral warning cue shortly before an event occurs (Posner and Petersen, 1990). However, effects of alerts on subsequent stimulus processing are less consistent in older than in younger individuals. In this study, we investigated the neural underpinnings of age differences in processing of auditory alerting cues. We measured electroencephalographic power and phase locking in response to alerting cues in a visual letter report task, in which younger but not older adults showed a cue-related behavioral advantage. Alerting cues evoked a significant increase in power as well as in inter-trial phase locking, with a maximum effect in the alpha frequency (8-12 Hz) in both age groups. Importantly, these cue-related increases in phase locking and power were stronger in older than in younger adults and were negatively correlated with the behavioral alerting effect in the older sample. Our results are in accordance with the assumption that older adults' neural responses may be more strongly driven by external input and less variable than younger adults'. A stronger neural response of the system to the auditory cue may have hindered older adults' effective use of the warning signal to foster processing of the following visual stimulus.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Alerting; Alpha oscillations; Arousal; EEG; Phase locking

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31029020     DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Aging        ISSN: 0197-4580            Impact factor:   4.673


  6 in total

1.  Linked Sources of Neural Noise Contribute to Age-related Cognitive Decline.

Authors:  Tam T Tran; Camarin E Rolle; Adam Gazzaley; Bradley Voytek
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The effects of age on reward magnitude processing in the monetary incentive delay task.

Authors:  Isha Dhingra; Sheng Zhang; Simon Zhornitsky; Thang M Le; Wuyi Wang; Herta H Chao; Ifat Levy; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Slow fluctuations in ongoing brain activity decrease in amplitude with ageing yet their impact on task-related evoked responses is dissociable from behavior.

Authors:  Maria Ribeiro; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Age-related changes in the functional integrity of the phasic alerting system: a pupillometric investigation.

Authors:  Mingjian He; William C Heindel; Matthew R Nassar; Elizabeth M Siefert; Elena K Festa
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Target value and prevalence influence visual foraging in younger and older age.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Right-lateralized fronto-parietal network and phasic alertness in healthy aging.

Authors:  Marleen Haupt; Adriana L Ruiz-Rizzo; Christian Sorg; Kathrin Finke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.