Literature DB >> 31027680

Undiagnosing to prevent overprescribing.

Amy Page1, Christopher Etherton-Beer2.   

Abstract

Health care focuses on controlling symptoms and managing risk factors to improve survival by avoiding future complications. Diagnoses describe a group of signs and symptoms, often implying specific aetiologies and underlying pathophysiological disease processes. The diagnosis provides a tool for the health professional to conceptualise and classify a presentation, and thus manage the condition, and can provide the patient with an explanation or validation of their experience. Not every diagnosis holds significant clinical implications. There are diagnosed conditions that do not require treatment and, moreover, where treatment has the potential for harm without the potential for benefit. Promoting investigations and diagnoses can lead to overdiagnosis related to vested interests in increased services, use of devices or therapeutics. Multiple factors drive this issue, including broadening disease definitions and cultural factors that encourage tests and treatments, as well as medicolegal factors. While the traditional medicine review process typically involved cross-referencing medicines used with current diagnoses, a more sophisticated version of this process critically reviews the medicines and associated diagnosis, giving less emphasis to diagnoses that are no longer relevant. Known as undiagnosis, this process facilitates the withdrawal of corresponding medicines used to manage those conditions. Systematically reviewing diagnoses regularly and the associated medicine management strategies could reduce prescribing. The novel ERASE process can help clinicians Evaluate diagnoses to consider Resolved conditions, Ageing normally and Selecting appropriate targets to Eliminate unnecessary diagnoses and their corresponding medicines.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deprescribing; Overdiagnosis; Overprescribing; Polypharmacy; Too much medicine; Undiagnosing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31027680     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  1 in total

1.  Too Much, Too Mild, Too Early: Diagnosing the Excessive Expansion of Diagnoses.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-08-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.