Literature DB >> 3102768

The financial incentive for hospitals to prevent nosocomial infections under the prospective payment system. An empirical determination from a nationally representative sample.

R W Haley, J W White, D H Culver, J M Hughes.   

Abstract

To clarify the financial incentives for hospitals to prevent nosocomial infections, we analyzed 9423 nosocomial infections identified in 169 526 admissions selected randomly from the adult admissions to a random sample of US hospitals. By classifying each admission into a baseline diagnosis related group (DRG) (after first excluding all diagnoses of nosocomial infection) and a final DRG (after including these diagnoses), we found that only 5% to 18% of nosocomial infections would have caused the admission to be reclassified to a higher-paying DRG, depending on the extent to which physicians recorded nosocomial infection diagnoses in patients' medical records. The extra payment from the reclassification, averaged over all nosocomial infections, would have been no more than $93 per infection (in 1985 reimbursement rates), constituting only 5% of the hospitals' costs for treating these infections. Thus, at least 95% of the cost savings obtained from preventing nosocomial infections represents financial gains to the hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3102768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  13 in total

1.  Infection control in acute care facilities: Evidence-based patient safety.

Authors:  L E Nicolle
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2001-05

2.  Towards a global perspective of nosocomial infections.

Authors:  R P Wenzel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Microbial inhibition on hospital garments treated with Dow Corning 5700 antimicrobial agent.

Authors:  P R Murray; A C Niles; R L Heeren
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  T G Emori; R P Gaynes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Handwashing: simple, but effective.

Authors:  I R Daniels; B I Rees
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Clinical impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia based on propensity scores.

Authors:  S Y Park; J S Son; I H Oh; J M Choi; M S Lee
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Wound dressings from a hygienic point of view using the example of sorbion sachet S.

Authors:  Axel Kramer; Alexander Maassen
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2009-12-16

8.  Financial Incentives to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Infections Under Alternative Payment Arrangements.

Authors:  Catherine Crawford Cohen; Jianfang Liu; Bevin Cohen; Elaine L Larson; Sherry Glied
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.254

9.  Noninvasive ventilation for patients near the end of life: what do we know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  William J Ehlenbach; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Serious postoperative infections following resection of common solid tumors: outcomes, costs, and impact of hospital surgical volume.

Authors:  Elenir B C Avritscher; Catherine D Cooksley; Kenneth V Rolston; J Michael Swint; George L Delclos; Luisa Franzini; Stephen G Swisher; Garrett L Walsh; Paul F Mansfield; Linda S Elting
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.