Literature DB >> 31027499

Optimizing ceftolozane-tazobactam dosage in critically ill patients during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration.

Gerardo Aguilar1,2, Rafael Ferriols3,4, Sara Martínez-Castro5,3, Carlos Ezquer3,4, Ernesto Pastor5,3, José A Carbonell5,3, Manuel Alós3,4, David Navarro3,6,7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31027499      PMCID: PMC6485129          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2434-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T), the combination of a new cephalosporin with a classic β-lactamase inhibitor, is currently considered the most active betalactam antibiotic against P. aeruginosa [1]. Despite several case reports on C/T pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) [2-4], the optimal dose in this clinical scenario still remains unclear [5]. A 68-year-old patient was admitted to our ICU with septic shock (nosocomial peritonitis) and anuric acute renal failure. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, including C/T and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHD), was initiated, using a polysulphone hemofilter (Fresenius, Germany) with blood flow, dialysate fluid, and replacement fluid rates of 100 mL/min, 2000 mL/h, and 1000 mL/h. The patient received high C/T doses of C/T 2 g/1 g every 8 h (infused over 1 h) while receiving CVVHD, and became apyrexial 7 days after C/T treatment initiation, remaining fever-free for 14 days without any adverse effects related to this drug. Pre-filter and post-filter blood and ultradiafiltrate samples were obtained during the 8-h dosing interval after the fourth dose. Drug concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Figure 1 and Table 1 show pre- and post-filter plasma concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated (Table 2). Extraction ratios were high for both ceftolozane and tazobactam (49.3% ± 1.8% and 40.5% ± 4.5%). Mean C/T concentrations in the ultrafiltrate were 40 mg/L and 13.5 mg/L, respectively.
Fig. 1

Simulated plasma concentrations versus time curves for ceftolozane and tazobactam. Pre-filter (thick line) and post-filter (fine line) ceftolozane plasma concentrations and pre-filter (thick dotted line) and post-filter (fine dotted line) tazobactam plasma concentrations. (The figure is original for this article)

Table 1

Concentrations of ceftolozane and tazobactam in pre-filter and post-filter plasma samples obtained after the fourth dose of 2 g/1 g ceftolozane-tazobactam administered as intravenous 1-h infusion

Sampling timeCeftolozane (mg/L)Tazobactam (mg/L)
Pre-filterPost-filterPre-filterPost-filter
0 h (pre dose)41.920.710.65.8
1.5 h post dose89.145.228.312.2
2 h post dose80.338.421.610.3
2.5 h post dose77.136.119.09.0
3 h post dose73.834.716.38.2
5 h post dose66.630.614.27.4
7 h post dose60.228.712.76.0
8 h post dose55.825.811.45.1
Table 2

Pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftolozane and tazobactam

ParameterCeftolozaneTazobactam
Pre-filterPost-filterPre-filterPost-filter
Clearance (L/h)2.15.46.417.4
Volume of distribution (L)53.997.5108.9194.2
Half-life (h)17.912.611.97.8
AUC (h mg/L)96037315757.6
Maximum concentration (mg/L)99533714.5
Minimum concentration (mg/L)55.925.811.45.1

AUC area under the concentration-time curve

Simulated plasma concentrations versus time curves for ceftolozane and tazobactam. Pre-filter (thick line) and post-filter (fine line) ceftolozane plasma concentrations and pre-filter (thick dotted line) and post-filter (fine dotted line) tazobactam plasma concentrations. (The figure is original for this article) Concentrations of ceftolozane and tazobactam in pre-filter and post-filter plasma samples obtained after the fourth dose of 2 g/1 g ceftolozane-tazobactam administered as intravenous 1-h infusion Pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftolozane and tazobactam AUC area under the concentration-time curve We decided on a 3 g/iv dose every 8 h, taking into account two previous studies [3, 4] and a recent study which showed CRRT to be an independent predictor of clinical failure (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.18–17.39, p = 0.02) when C/T is administered at 1.5 g every 8 h [5]. Ceftolozane and tazobactam are small molecules with low plasma protein binding rates, causing most to be removed during CRRT. Despite the considerable C/T clearance observed in our patients during CVVHD, however, ceftolozane plasma concentrations remained above the MIC, for MICs of up to 8 μg/mL, throughout the dosing interval, assuming 20% protein binding. Given that C/T exhibits linear, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, a standard C/T dose of 1 g/0.5 g would be expected to maintain ceftolozane levels above the MIC during the entire dosing interval, although tazobactam concentrations could be insufficient, even taking higher pre-filter rather than lower post-filter levels as representative of therapeutic serum levels. In conclusion, our data underscore that a dosage of 3 g every 8 h can be used safely to prevent the potential harm of underdosing ceftolozane/tazobactam during CRRT; larger studies are however needed to confirm our findings.
  5 in total

1.  Treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa with ceftolozane/tazobactam in a critically ill patient receiving continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Joseph L Kuti; Islam M Ghazi; Richard Quintiliani; Eric Shore; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 5.283

2.  Ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of serious Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a multicentre nationwide clinical experience.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Nadia Castaldo; Annamaria Cattelan; Cristina Mussini; Elda Righi; Carlo Tascini; Francesco Menichetti; Claudio Maria Mastroianni; Mario Tumbarello; Paolo Grossi; Stefania Artioli; Novella Carannante; Ludovica Cipriani; Davide Coletto; Alessandro Russo; Margherita Digaetano; Angela Raffaella Losito; Maddalena Peghin; Alessandro Capone; Stefano Nicolè; Antonio Vena
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Pharmacokinetics in a Critically Ill Adult Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Derek N Bremmer; David P Nicolau; Pam Burcham; Anil Chunduri; Ganesh Shidham; Karri A Bauer
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.705

4.  Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Pharmacokinetics in a Critically Ill Patient on Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration.

Authors:  Wesley D Oliver; Emily L Heil; Jeffrey P Gonzales; Shailly Mehrotra; Kathryn Robinett; Paul Saleeb; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  The ideal patient profile for new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors.

Authors:  Philippe Montravers; Matteo Bassetti
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.915

  5 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.

Authors:  Dafna Yahav; Christian G Giske; Alise Grāmatniece; Henrietta Abodakpi; Vincent H Tam; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Drug Regimens of Novel Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients with Varying Renal Functions: A Rapid Review.

Authors:  Julie Gorham; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Maya Hites
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20

3.  Ceftolozane Pharmacokinetics in a Septic Critically Ill Patient under Different Extracorporeal Replacement Therapies.

Authors:  Nieves Carbonell; Gerardo Aguilar; Rafael Ferriols; Rotzel Huerta; José Ferreres; Marisa Calabuig; Mar Juan; Carlos Ezquer; Javier Colomina; M Luisa Blasco
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Real-world use of ceftolozane/tazobactam: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Laura Puzniak; Ryan Dillon; Thomas Palmer; Hannah Collings; Ashley Enstone
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 4.887

5.  Comparison between meropenem and ceftolozane/tazobactam: possible influence of CRRT.

Authors:  Patrick M Honore; Sebastien Redant; Thierry Preseau; Sofie Moorthamers; Keitiane Kaefer; Leonel Barreto Gutierrez; Rachid Attou; Andrea Gallerani; Willem Boer; David De Bels
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Recommendation of Antimicrobial Dosing Optimization During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Lu Li; Xin Li; Yanzhe Xia; Yanqi Chu; Haili Zhong; Jia Li; Pei Liang; Yishan Bu; Rui Zhao; Yun Liao; Ping Yang; Xiaoyang Lu; Saiping Jiang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  A Population Pharmacokinetic Model-Guided Evaluation of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Fekade B Sime; Melissa Lassig-Smith; Therese Starr; Janine Stuart; Saurabh Pandey; Suzanne L Parker; Steven C Wallis; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Antimicrobial Dose Reduction in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Myth or Real Need? A Practical Approach for Guiding Dose Optimization of Novel Antibiotics.

Authors:  Milo Gatti; Federico Pea
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 6.447

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.