| Literature DB >> 31027373 |
Masahiko Matsuo1, Yasuyuki Taira2, Makiko Orita3, Yumiko Yamada4, Juichi Ide5, Shunichi Yamashita6, Noboru Takamura7.
Abstract
On 1 April 2017, six years have passed since the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (FDNPS) accident, and the Japanese government declared that some residents who lived in Tomioka Town, Fukushima Prefecture could return to their homes. We evaluated environmental contamination and radiation exposure dose rates due to artificial radionuclides in the livelihood zone of residents (living space such as housing sites), including a restricted area located within a 10-km radius from the FDNPS, immediately after residents had returned home in Tomioka town. In areas where the evacuation orders had been lifted, the median air dose rates were 0.20 μSv/h indoors and 0.26 μSv/h outdoors, and the radiation exposure dose rate was 1.6 mSv/y. By contrast, in the "difficult-to-return zone," the median air dose rate was 2.3 μSv/h (20 mSv/y) outdoors. Moreover, the dose-forming artificial radionuclides (radiocesium) in the surface soil were 0.018 μSv/h (0.17 mSv/y) in the evacuation order-lifted areas and 0.73 μSv/h (6.4 mSv/y) in the difficult-to-return zone. These findings indicate that current concentrations of artificial radionuclides in soil samples have been decreasing in the evacuation order-lifted areas of Tomioka town; however, a significant external exposure risk still exists in the difficult-to-return zone. The case of Tomioka town is expected to be the first reconstruction model including the difficult-to-return zone.Entities:
Keywords: Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident; Tomioka town; air dose rate; difficult-to-return zone; effective dose rate; evacuation order-lifted areas; external exposure risk; living space; radiocesium; surface soil
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31027373 PMCID: PMC6539872 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16091481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Location of Tomioka town, Fukushima Prefecture.
Air dose rates around residences and assembly halls in Tomioka town, Fukushima Prefecture, during September to October 2017.
| Points | Air Dose Rate in μSv/h | External Effective Dose Rate in mSv/y | Shielding Factor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Range | Median | ||||
| Evacuation order-lifted areas ( | Indoors | 0.20 ± 0.058 | 0.086–0.37 | 0.20 (0.28) | 1.7 | 0.77 |
| Outdoors | 0.29 ± 0.12 | 0.088–0.68 | 0.26 (0.43) | 2.3 | ||
| Backyard | 0.40 ± 0.19 | 0.14–1.34 | 0.34 (0.63) | 3.0 | ||
| Difficult-to-return zone ( | Outdoors | 2.2 ± 0.65 | 1.1–2.9 | 2.3 (2.7) | 20 | |
| Backyard | 2.1 ± 0.23 | 1.8–2.4 | 2.1 (2.4) | 18 | ||
residences (n = 45) and assembly halls (n = 16). assembly halls (n = 4). mean ± S.D. minimum-maximum. parentheses show 90th percentile. median × 24h × 365d × 0.001. shielding factor of air dose rates ratio (indoors/outdoors).
Distribution of radiocesium in soil samples in Tomioka town, Fukushima Prefecture.
| Points | Radiocesium Concentration in Bq/kg (dry) | External Effective Dose Rate in mSv/y | Radionuclide Ratio in 134Cs/137Cs | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| depth | Average | Range | Median | ||||||
| 134Cs (2.1 y) | 137Cs (30 y) | 134Cs (2.1 y) | 137Cs (30 y) | 134Cs (2.1 y) | 137Cs (30 y) | ||||
| Evacuation-order-lifted areas ( | 0–5 cm | 694.3 ± 1137 | 4996 ± 8421 | 8.0–6063 | 34–45,331 | 238 (1950) | 1784 (12,966) | 0.17 | 0.13 (0.14) |
| 5–10 cm | 750.0 ± 1035 | 5585 ± 8163 | 3.7–5803 | 28–48,911 | 334 (2016) | 2093 (15,209) | 0.13 (0.14) | ||
| Difficult-to-return zone ( | 0–5 cm | 9480 ± 5708 | 72,757 ± 43,211 | 3317–18,552 | 25,559–141,209 | 8025 (15,906) | 62,131 (121,336) | 6.4 | 0.13 (0.13) |
| 5–10 cm | 6739 ± 2067 | 52,343 ± 15,690 | 4654–9034 | 36,317–69,377 | 6633 (8893) | 51,840 (68,551) | 0.13 (0.14) | ||
Residences (n = 45) and assembly halls (n = 16). Assembly halls (n = 4). mean ± S.D. minimum-maximum. parentheses show 90th percentile. calculated by the formula (2). median (90th percentile).
Figure 2Relationship between estimated external effective dose rates from surface soil and air dose rates in Tomioka town. (a) Air dose rates in outdoor (entrance) vs., (b) air dose rates in outdoors (backyard) vs. and (c) air dose rates in indoor (entrance) vs. effective dose rates of soil samples. The external effective dose rates from soil samples were estimated using a high purity germanium detector (only radiocesium). Air dose rates were measured at the sampling points using a NaI (Tl) scintillation survey meter (natural dose rates including radiocesium).
Figure 3External exposure doses immediately after the cancellation of restriction in Tomioka Town. The effective external doses in residents living space within housing sites during September to October in 2017. Yellow, blue and green squares show the natural dose rates including radiocesium. Red square shows the external effective dose rates from soil samples (only radiocesium).