Literature DB >> 31027124

Cumulative sum analysis of learning curve for video-assisted mini-laparotomy partial nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma.

Jee Soo Park1, Hyun Kyu Ahn1, Joonchae Na1, Hyung Ho Lee2, Young Eun Yoon3, Min Gee Yoon1, Woong Kyu Han1,4.   

Abstract

Video-assisted mini-laparotomy surgery (VAMS), a hybrid of open and laparoscopic surgical techniques, is an important surgical approach in the field of partial nephrectomy. The learning curve for VAMS partial nephrectomy has not been studied to date; we therefore, evaluated this learning curve.We prospectively evaluated 20 consecutive patients who underwent VAMS partial nephrectomy performed by a single surgeon (YEY) between March 2015 and December 2016. The learning curve was evaluated using the cumulative sum method. The measure of surgical performance was composed of 3 parameters (total operation time [Op time], warm ischemic time [WIT], and estimated blood loss [EBL]).Among the 20 patients who underwent VAMS partial nephrectomy, the mean age was 54.6 years. The mean Op time and WIT were 172.5 and 28.8 minutes, respectively. The learning curve for the Op time, WIT, and EBL consisted of 3 unique phases: phase 1 (the first 7 cases), phase 2 (the next 5 to 7 cases), and phase 3 (all subsequent cases). Phase 1 represents the initial learning curve, and the phase 2 plateau represents the period of expert competency. Phase 3 represents when one is competent in VAMS partial nephrectomy.The learning curve for VAMS partial nephrectomy is relatively short and after a learning curve of approximately 7 cases, the surgeon became familiar with VAMS partial nephrectomy; after 12 to 14 cases, the surgeon became competent in this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31027124      PMCID: PMC6831345          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


  19 in total

1.  Exploring the learning curve, pathological outcomes and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed for renal mass.

Authors:  Richard E Link; Sam B Bhayani; Mohammed E Allaf; Ioannis Varkarakis; Takeshi Inagaki; Craig Rogers; Li-Ming Su; Thomas W Jarrett; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Cumulative sum curves and their prediction limits.

Authors:  Gary L Grunkemeier; Ruyun Jin; YingXing Wu
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Krish Sairam; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Quality of life comparison between open and retroperitoneal video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery for kidney donors.

Authors:  W K Han; H Y Lee; H G Jeon; D J Joo; K H Rha; S C Yang
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Predictors of renal function after open and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Young Dong Yu; Ngoc Ha Nguyen; Ho Young Ryu; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sangchul Lee
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 3.369

6.  Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Hiten D Patel; Tom Feng; Jithin Yohannan; Elias S Hyams; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: evaluation of long-term oncological outcome.

Authors:  Mohamad E Allaf; Sam B Bhayani; Craig Rogers; Ioannis Varkarakis; Richard E Link; Takeshi Inagaki; Thomas W Jarrett; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth.

Authors:  Alexander Kutikov; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Impact of quality strategies on hospital outputs.

Authors:  R Suñol; P Vallejo; A Thompson; M J M H Lombarts; C D Shaw; N Klazinga
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-02

Review 10.  Emerging urinary markers of renal injury in obstructive nephropathy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lucarelli; Vito Mancini; Vanessa Galleggiante; Monica Rutigliano; Antonio Vavallo; Michele Battaglia; Pasquale Ditonno
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  2 in total

1.  Analyzing the learning curve of vaginal pelvic reconstruction surgery with and without mesh by the cumulative summation test (CUSUM).

Authors:  Chin-Jui Wu; Kuan-Ju Huang; Wen-Chun Chang; Ying-Xuan Li; Lin-Hung Wei; Bor-Ching Sheu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Early experience with the ARTISENTIAL® articulated instruments in laparoscopic low anterior resection with TME.

Authors:  I Darwich; M Abuassi; R Aliyev; M Scheidt; M A Alkadri; A Hees; S Demirel-Darwich; M Chand; F Willeke
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.699

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.