INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare epileptic seizure control and economic impact in patients with epilepsy between when they were seen by general physicians (GPs) versus epilepsy specialists. METHOD: We began distributing a booklet we named the "Epi Passport" to patients with epilepsy in December 2014 to share information within the regional epilepsy network of GPs, epilepsy specialists, and patients (Gep). We compared seizure control and household income levels before and after the introduction of this booklet. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in seizure control between patients who saw specialists or GPs (P = 0.215). Significant increases in household income were seen among 134 patients (36.6%) in the post-Epi Passport period who were primarily seen by GPs (P < 0.001). However, 35 patients (9.6%) showed a decrease in income between periods, and 197 patients (53.8%) showed no change. Age of 20-39 years old was significantly associated with increases in household income (P = 0.0287). CONCLUSION: After the introduction of the Epi Passport, about one-third of the patients with epilepsy who were mainly seen by GPs in their community showed an increase in household income. There was no difference in seizure control among those who saw a GP or a specialist. Inclusion of GPs in the multidisciplinary treatment team for epilepsy may lead to increased patient income because of the fact that patients can manage their epilepsy in their community using their GP.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare epilepticseizure control and economic impact in patients with epilepsy between when they were seen by general physicians (GPs) versus epilepsy specialists. METHOD: We began distributing a booklet we named the "Epi Passport" to patients with epilepsy in December 2014 to share information within the regional epilepsy network of GPs, epilepsy specialists, and patients (Gep). We compared seizure control and household income levels before and after the introduction of this booklet. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in seizure control between patients who saw specialists or GPs (P = 0.215). Significant increases in household income were seen among 134 patients (36.6%) in the post-Epi Passport period who were primarily seen by GPs (P < 0.001). However, 35 patients (9.6%) showed a decrease in income between periods, and 197 patients (53.8%) showed no change. Age of 20-39 years old was significantly associated with increases in household income (P = 0.0287). CONCLUSION: After the introduction of the Epi Passport, about one-third of the patients with epilepsy who were mainly seen by GPs in their community showed an increase in household income. There was no difference in seizure control among those who saw a GP or a specialist. Inclusion of GPs in the multidisciplinary treatment team for epilepsy may lead to increased patient income because of the fact that patients can manage their epilepsy in their community using their GP.