Literature DB >> 31026460

Shorter vs Longer Immobilization After Surgery for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Jonathan Tsehaie1, Robbert M Wouters2, Reinier Feitz3, Harm P Slijper3, Steven E R Hovius4, Ruud W Selles5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if shorter immobilization is noninferior to longer immobilization after Weilby procedure for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with propensity score matching.
SETTING: Data collection took place in 16 outpatient clinics for hand surgery and hand therapy. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 131 participants with shorter immobilization and 131 participants with longer immobilization (N=262). INTERVENTION: Shorter immobilization (3-5 days plaster cast followed by a thumb spica orthosis including wrist until 4 weeks postoperatively) was compared with longer immobilization (10-14 days plaster cast followed by a thumb spica orthosis including wrist until 6 weeks postoperatively) after Weilby procedure for first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Propensity score matching was used to control for confounders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were pain measured with a visual analog scale and hand function measured with the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire at 3 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were complications, range of motion, grip and pinch strength, satisfaction with treatment, and return to work.
RESULTS: No significant differences were found in visual analog scale pain (effect size, 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.21 to 0.27) or the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (effect size, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.25) between the groups at 3 months or at 12 months. Furthermore, no differences were found in complication rate or in other secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, shorter immobilization of 3-5 days of a plaster cast after Weilby procedure is equal to longer immobilization for outcomes on pain, hand function, and our secondary outcomes. These results indicate that shorter immobilization is safe and can be recommended, since discomfort of longer immobilization may be prevented and patients may be able to recover sooner, which may lead to reduced loss of productivity. Future studies need to investigate effectiveness of early active and more progressive hand therapy following first carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2019 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Carpometacarpal joints; Equivalence trials as topic; Osteoarthritis; Rehabilitation; Thumb

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31026460     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  3 in total

1.  Factors affecting return to work after surgical treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Mark J W van der Oest; Joris S Teunissen; Ralph Poelstra; Reinier Feitz; Alex Burdorf; Ruud W Selles
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2020-12-07

2.  Immobilization and Hand Therapy After Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patrick C Barrett; Darren T Hackley; Linsen T Samuel; Peter J Apel
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 3.  Closing the loop: a 10-year experience with routine outcome measurements to improve treatment in hand surgery.

Authors:  Reinier Feitz; Yara E van Kooij; Marloes H P Ter Stege; Mark J W van der Oest; J Sebastiaan Souer; Robbert M Wouters; Harm P Slijper; Ruud W Selles; Steven E R Hovius
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-06-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.