| Literature DB >> 31024933 |
Barbara Elisabeth Ursula Burkhardt1,2, Christian Johannes Kellenberger2,3, Francesca Daniela Franzoso1,2, Julia Geiger2,3, Angela Oxenius1,2, Emanuela Regina Valsangiacomo Buechel1,2.
Abstract
Introduction: Adult survivors of the atrial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries present with a systemic morphologic right ventricle and a subpulmonary morphologic left ventricle. This physiology can be considered a model for the effects of long-term right ventricular pressure overload and of decreased left ventricular afterload. We aimed to determine the impact of these chronically altered loading conditions on myocardial deformation of the ventricles. Materials and methods: Two-dimensional steady state free precession cine images of 29 patients after atrial repair (age 29 ± 7 years) and 19 controls (24 ± 10 years; n.s.) were post-processed with feature tracking software (TomTec 2D CPA). Volumes, ejection fractions, global and free wall longitudinal and circumferential strains of both ventricles were compared between both groups.Entities:
Keywords: atrial switch operation; cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR); strain; systemic right ventricle; transposition of great arteries (TGA)
Year: 2019 PMID: 31024933 PMCID: PMC6465947 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Endocardial tracing of the ventricles in a Senning patient. The green line shows the endocardial border tracing of the systemic right ventricle (RV), horizontal long axis (a); systemic RV, short axis (b); subpulmonary left ventricle (LV), horizontal long axis (c); subpulmonary LV, short axis (d).
Subject characteristics.
| Age [years] | 29 ± 7 | 24 ± 10 | 0.05 |
| Male [number (%)] | 17 (59%) | 10 (53%) | 0.46 |
| Height [cm] | 167.9 ± 10.2 | 172.4 ± 13.9 | 0.20 |
| Weight [kg] | 68 ± 13.5 | 64.6 ± 12.7 | 0.39 |
| Heart rate [bpm] | 64 ± 14 | 70 ± 16 | 0.12 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Ventricular volumes and ejection fractions for the right and the left ventricle in their anatomic positions (upper half) and in their functional positions (lower half).
| RV EDVI [ml/m2] | 114 ± 24 | 84 ± 16 | |
| RV ESVI [ml/m2] | 68 ± 18 | 40 ± 9 | |
| RV EF [%] | 40 ± 5 | 53 ± 6 | |
| LV EDVI [ml/m2] | 75 ± 15 | 88 ± 16 | |
| LV ESVI [ml/m2] | 30 ± 8 | 37 ± 9 | 0.514 |
| LV EF [%] | 60 ± 6 | 58 ± 5 | 0.159 |
| RV/LV EDVR | 1.53 ± 0.21 | 0.96 ± 0.10 | |
| SV EDVI [ml/m2] | 114 ± 24 | 88 ± 16 | |
| SV ESVI [ml/m2] | 68 ± 18 | 37 ± 9 | |
| SV EF [%] | 40 ± 5 | 58 ± 5 | |
| SPV EDVI [ml/m2] | 75 ± 15 | 84 ± 16 | |
| SPV ESVI [ml/m2] | 30 ± 8 | 40 ± 9 | 0.831 |
| SPV EF [%] | 60 ± 6 | 53 ± 6 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. EDVI, end-diastolic volume index; EDVR, end-diastolic volume ratio; EF, ejection fraction; ESVI, end-systolic volume index; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; SPV, subpulmonary ventricle; SV, systemic ventricle. p values in bold type denote statistically significant differences.
Figure 2Maximal global strain for right (RV) and left ventricles (LV) in Senning patients and controls.
Figure 3Maximal global strain for systemic and subpulmonary ventricles in Senning patients and controls.
Comparison of global vs. free wall strains.
| RV longitudinal strain [%] | −12.9 ± 3.3 | −15.3 ± 3.2 | |
| RV circumferential strain [%] | −15.8 ± 3.4 | −17.1 ± 3.3 | |
| LV longitudinal strain [%] | −17 ± 5.6 | −20.4 ± 8.1 | |
| LV circumferential strain [%] | −20.7 ± 4.1 | −24.3 ± 5.1 | |
| RV longitudinal strain [%] | −18.9 ± 4.6 | −24.7 ± 5.4 | |
| RV circumferential strain [%] | −15.1 ± 5 | −15.2 ± 6.7 | 0.92 |
| LV longitudinal strain [%] | −17.5 ± 4.6 | −20.4 ± 4.1 | |
| LV circumferential strain [%] | −27.3 ± 4.5 | −26.7 ± 4.7 | 0.148 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle. p values in bold type denote statistically significant differences
Intraobserver variability.
| RV ε circ | −17.2 | 0.67 | 3.2 | −5.7; 7.0 | 18.8 | 0.892 |
| LV ε circ | −25.1 | −0.94 | 2.7 | −6.3; 4.4 | 10.9 | 0.946 |
| RV ε long | −19.1 | −0.91 | 1.5 | −3.8; 2.0 | 7.7 | 0.983 |
| LV ε long | −16.8 | −3.32 | 3.5 | −10.2; 3.6 | 21.1 | 0.885 |
Limits of agreement encompass the 95% confidence interval of differences between measurements.
CV, coefficient of variation = SD of differences between 2 measurements, divided by mean of 2 measurements. ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; LV ε circ, left ventricular circumferential strain; LV ε long, left ventricular longitudinal strain; RV ε circ, right ventricular circumferential strain; RV ε long, right ventricular longitudinal strain; SD, standard deviation.
Interobserver variability.
| RV ε circ | −16.1 | −1.49 | 2.8 | −7.0; 4.0 | 17.5 | 0.908 |
| LV ε circ | −24.6 | 0.01 | 2.7 | −5.3; 5.3 | 10.9 | 0.947 |
| RV ε long | −17.6 | 2.01 | 3.9 | −5.6; 9.7 | 22.2 | 0.862 |
| LV ε long | −15.9 | −1.60 | 4.2 | −9.8; 6.6 | 26.3 | 0.742 |
Limits of agreement encompass the 95% confidence interval of differences between measurements.
CV, coefficient of variation; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; LV ε circ, left ventricular circumferential strain; LV ε long, left ventricular longitudinal strain; RV ε circ, right ventricular circumferential strain; RV ε long, right ventricular longitudinal strain; SD, standard deviation.