| Literature DB >> 31024860 |
Javed Muhammad1,2, Masood Rabbani1, Muhammad Zubair Shabbir1, Khushi Muhammad1, Muhammad Taslim Ghori3, Haroon Rashid Chaudhry3, Zia Ul Hassnain1, Tariq Jamil1, Tariq Abbas4, Muhammad Hamid Chaudhry5, Muhammad Haisem-Ur-Rasool1, Muhammad Asad Ali1, Muhammad Nisar4, Girish S Kirimanjeswara6, Bhushan M Jayarao6.
Abstract
Tularemia is an endemic zoonotic disease in many parts of the world including Asia. A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine genome-based prevalence of Francisella tularensis (Ft) in soil, assess an association between its occurrence in soil and likely predictors i.e., macro and micro-nutrients and several categorical variables, and determine seroconversion in small and large ruminants. The study included a total of 2,280 soil samples representing 456 villages in eight districts of the Punjab Province of Pakistan followed by an analysis of serum antibodies in 707 ruminants. The genome of Ft was detected in 3.25% (n = 74, 95% CI: 2.60-4.06) of soil samples. Soluble salts (OR: 1.276, 95% CI: 1.043-1.562, p = 0.015), Ni (OR: 2.910, 95%CI: 0.795-10.644, p = 0.106), Mn (OR:0.733, 95% CI:0.565-0.951, p = 0.019), Zn (OR: 4.922, 95% CI:0.929-26.064, p = 0.061) and nutrients clustered together as PC-1 (OR: 4.76, 95% CI: 2.37-9.54, p = 0.000) and PC-3 (OR: 0.357, 95% CI: 0.640, p = 0.001) were found to have a positive association for the presence of Ft in soil. The odds of occurrence of Ft DNA in soil were higher at locations close to a water source, including canals, streams or drains, [χ2 = 6.7, OR = 1.19, 95% CI:1.05-3.09, p = 0.004] as well as places where animals were present [χ2 = 4.09, OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.05-4.05, p = 0.02]. The seroconversion was detected in 6.22% (n = 44, 95% CI: 4.67-8.25) of domestic animals. An occurrence of Ft over a wide geographical region indicates its expansion to enzootic range, and demonstrates the need for further investigation among potential disease reservoirs and at-risk populations, such as farmers and veterinarians.Entities:
Keywords: Francisella tularensis; Pakistan; Punjab province; domestic animals; soil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31024860 PMCID: PMC6460113 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Eigenvalues and percentage of intertia explained by each principal component.
| 1 | 2.143 | 30.619 | 30.619 | 2.143 | 30.619 | 30.619 |
| 2 | 1.914 | 27.339 | 57.957 | 1.914 | 27.339 | 57.957 |
| 3 | 1.351 | 19.299 | 77.256 | 1.351 | 19.299 | 77.256 |
| 4 | 0.895 | 12.783 | 90.039 | |||
| 5 | 0.348 | 4.978 | 95.017 | |||
| 6 | 0.285 | 4.076 | 99.093 | |||
| 7 | 0.064 | 0.907 | 100.000 | |||
Figure 2Biplot showing representation of sampling points (called individuals) and physiochemical attributes (variables) in multivariate principal component space.
Outcome of logistic regression analysis showing association between presences of DNA of Francisella tularensis soil samples and its potential risk factors.
| Soluble salts | 0.244 | 0.103 | 5.606 | 1 | 0.018 | 1.276 | 1.043 | 1.562 |
| Ni | 1.068 | 0.662 | 2.606 | 1 | 0.106 | 2.910 | 0.795 | 10.644 |
| Mn | −0.310 | 0.133 | 5.483 | 1 | 0.019 | 0.733 | 0.565 | 0.951 |
| Zn | 1.594 | 0.850 | 3.511 | 1 | 0.061 | 4.922 | 0.929 | 26.064 |
| PC1 | 1.560 | 0.355 | 19.294 | 1 | 0.000 | 4.760 | 2.373 | 9.548 |
| PC3 | −1.030 | 0.298 | 11.934 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.357 | 0.199 | 0.640 |
| Distance from animal market | 0.534 | 0.975 | 9.318 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.57 | 0.30 | 1.07 |
| Water source (canal/stream/drain) | −2.051 | 2.762 | 13.956 | 1 | 0.004 | 1.19 | 1.19 | 3.09 |
| Animal density in a village | 0.927 | 0.175 | 8.59 | 1 | 0.07 | 1.56 | 0.97 | 2.43 |
| Number of households in a village | −1.823 | 0.690 | 3.489 | 1 | 0.002 | 0.38 | 0.20 | 0.71 |
| Domestic animal | 0.121 | 0.378 | 7.321 | 1 | 0.02 | 2.069 | 1.05 | 4.05 |
| Ground cover (vegetation) | −0.781 | 0.782 | 6.812 | 1 | 0.08 | 1.49 | 0.88 | 2.51 |
| Constant | −3.647 | 1.381 | 6.978 | 1 | 0.008 | 0.026 | ||
Figure 1Geographical distribution of Francisella tularensis-positive soil samples in 8 districts.
Factor-loading matrix for the phyio-chemical attributes of soil sampled identified by principal component analysis.
| Silt | −0.524 | −0.467 | 0.572 |
| Clay | 0.593 | −0.567 | |
| Organic Matter | −0.515 | 0.820 | |
| Cd | 0.693 | 0.523 | |
| Cr | |||
| Pb | 0.646 | 0.623 | |
| N | −0.533 | 0.809 | |
Figure 3Representation (squared cosine, cos2) of variables and individuals (sampling sites) along first two principal components.
Figure 4Spatial distribution of anti-Francisella tularensis seropositivity in livestock originating from study districts.